calabash-location-mocking | Example app used to show gps location mocking | Mock library

 by   testmunk Java Version: Current License: No License

kandi X-RAY | calabash-location-mocking Summary

kandi X-RAY | calabash-location-mocking Summary

calabash-location-mocking is a Java library typically used in Testing, Mock applications. calabash-location-mocking has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has build file available and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Example app used to show gps location mocking in Calabash-Android tests.

            kandi-support Support

              calabash-location-mocking has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 3 star(s) with 0 fork(s). There are 4 watchers for this library.
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              calabash-location-mocking has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of calabash-location-mocking is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              calabash-location-mocking has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              calabash-location-mocking has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              calabash-location-mocking does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              calabash-location-mocking releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Build file is available. You can build the component from source.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of calabash-location-mocking
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            calabash-location-mocking Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for calabash-location-mocking.

            calabash-location-mocking Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for calabash-location-mocking.

            Community Discussions


            Change behaviour of AutoFixture with AutoMoq to return false for methods
            Asked 2022-Mar-31 at 09:22

            Say that I have the following interface:



            Answered 2022-Mar-26 at 16:40

            First of all, you may want to use AutoMoqDataAttribute to create a mock of the ITeam interface:



            The unauthenticated git protocol on port 9418 is no longer supported
            Asked 2022-Mar-27 at 13:23

            I have been using github actions for quite sometime but today my deployments started failing. Below is the error from github action logs



            Answered 2022-Mar-16 at 07:01

            First, this error message is indeed expected on Jan. 11th, 2022.
            See "Improving Git protocol security on GitHub".

            January 11, 2022 Final brownout.

            This is the full brownout period where we’ll temporarily stop accepting the deprecated key and signature types, ciphers, and MACs, and the unencrypted Git protocol.
            This will help clients discover any lingering use of older keys or old URLs.

            Second, check your package.json dependencies for any git:// URL, as in this example, fixed in this PR.

            As noted by Jörg W Mittag:

            There was a 4-month warning.
            The entire Internet has been moving away from unauthenticated, unencrypted protocols for a decade, it's not like this is a huge surprise.

            Personally, I consider it less an "issue" and more "detecting unmaintained dependencies".

            Plus, this is still only the brownout period, so the protocol will only be disabled for a short period of time, allowing developers to discover the problem.

            The permanent shutdown is not until March 15th.

            For GitHub Actions:

            As in actions/checkout issue 14, you can add as a first step:



            Making a JSX syntax for a MockComponent and have it typed with typescript
            Asked 2022-Mar-20 at 22:37

            Wondering if anybody has some good suggestions on how to crack this. Got this test helper utils I have added some types to:



            Answered 2022-Mar-20 at 22:37

            If you look at React without JSX, you'll see that the XML-inspired syntax () is just short for React.createElement('MockComponent').

            Right now, if you renamed mockComponent to MockComponent and tried using the angle bracket syntax, the first issue is that your function receives two arguments. React components are either class components that take one constructor argument (props) or functional components that take one argument (again, props). The second issue is that your function returns a React functional component, when it needs to return a rendered React element.

            One way to fix this issue is to convert mockComponent into a React functional component and make module and propOverride props of the FC.



            Can not instantiate proxy of class: System.Net.HttpWebRequest. Could not find a parameterless constructor
            Asked 2022-Feb-23 at 12:05

            I am upgrading my C# function app from .net 3.1 to 6.0`.

            When I run my test cases, I found that, 1 of my test case failed with the below error.

            Castle.DynamicProxy.InvalidProxyConstructorArgumentsException : Can not instantiate proxy of class: System.Net.HttpWebRequest. Could not find a parameterless constructor.

            Basically, I am trying to mock HttpWebRequest and below is my piece of code for that.



            Answered 2022-Feb-23 at 10:53

            Both HttpWebRequest constructors are obsolete and should not be used. You have to use the static function "Create" to create a new instance of the HttpWebRequest class:

            HttpWebRequest myReq = (HttpWebRequest)WebRequest.Create("");

            To solve your issue, use the HttpClient class instead. This class has a parameterless constructor.



            Apache Beam Cloud Dataflow Streaming Stuck Side Input
            Asked 2022-Jan-12 at 13:12

            I'm currently building PoC Apache Beam pipeline in GCP Dataflow. In this case, I want to create streaming pipeline with main input from PubSub and side input from BigQuery and store processed data back to BigQuery.

            Side pipeline code



            Answered 2022-Jan-12 at 13:12

            Here you have a working example:



            How to compare file paths from JsonConfigurationSources and Directory.GetFiles properly?
            Asked 2021-Dec-20 at 04:22

            I created an extension method to add all JSON configuration files to the IConfigurationBuilder



            Answered 2021-Dec-19 at 09:24

            The logic of comparing files seems alright, I don't find any outstanding problem with it, it is ok to prepend the "/" to match what you need. Could be even better if you could use the System.IO.Path.DirectorySeparatorChar for the directory root path as well, so if you run on windows or Linux you will have no issues.

            But there may be a conceptual problem with what you are doing. To my understanding you aim to verify existence of specific configuration files required for your program to work right, if those files are missing than the program should fail. But that kind of failure due to missing configuration files, is an expected and valid result of your code. Yet, you unit-test this as if missing files should fail the test, as if missing files are an indication that something wrong with your code, this is wrong.

            Missing files are not indication of your code not working correct and Unit-test should not be used as a validator to make sure the files exist prior executing the program, you will likely agree that unit-test is not part of the actual process and it should only aim to test your code and not preconditions, the test should compare an expected result (mock result of your code) vs. actual result and certainly not meant to become part of the code. That unit test looks like a validator that should be in the code.

            So unless those files are produced by your specific code (and not the deployment) there is no sense testing that. In such case you need to create a configuration validator code - and your unit test could test that instead. So it will test that the validator expected result with a mock input you provide. But the thing here is that you would know that you only testing the validation logic and not the actual existence of the files.



            How to get preview in composable functions that depend on a view model?
            Asked 2021-Dec-16 at 21:53
            Problem description

            I would like to have the preview of my HomeScreen composable function in my HomeScreenPrevieiw preview function. However this is not being possible to do because I am getting the following error:



            Answered 2021-Sep-07 at 16:48

            This is exactly one of the reasons why the view model is passed with a default value. In the preview, you can pass a test object:



            v0.8 AggregatorV3Interface.sol , its available in @chainlink/contracts?
            Asked 2021-Nov-05 at 21:48

            I get a error when i change the version to 0.8 , but works fine with 0.6, how i see the most recent version? , i tried downloaded from npm install @chainlink/contracts --save, but only works with mock mode.

            This is my repo:

            Compiling contracts... Solc version: 0.8.9 Optimizer: Enabled Runs: 200 EVM Version: Istanbul CompilerError: solc returned the following errors:

            ParserError: Source "C:/Users/irwin/.brownie/packages/smartcontractkit/chainlink-brownie-contracts@1.1.1/contracts/src/v0.8/interfaces/AggregatorV3Interface.sol" not found: File not found. --> contracts/Lottery.sol:4:1: | 4 | import "@chainlink/contracts/src/v0.8/interfaces/AggregatorV3Interface.sol"; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

            ERROR: Unable to load project



            Answered 2021-Nov-05 at 21:48

            "As of 1.2.0 and onward all the releases of this package are going to match the @chainlink/contracts NPM tags So it will look backwards, but we are starting with 0.2.1"

            Change: @chainlink=smartcontractkit/chainlink-brownie-contracts@1.1.1 To: @chainlink=smartcontractkit/chainlink-brownie-contracts@0.2.1




            Not able to mock a function inside useEffect
            Asked 2021-Oct-13 at 08:26

            I have a custom hook as below



            Answered 2021-Oct-13 at 05:27

            Because it's a named export you should return an object in the mock



            pytest/unittest: mock.patch function from module?
            Asked 2021-Sep-22 at 07:06

            Given a folder structure like such:



            Answered 2021-Sep-22 at 07:06

            Yeah. I also fought with this initially when I learned patching and mocking and know how frustrating it is as you seem to be doing everything right, but it does not work. I sympathise with you!

            This is actually how mocking of imported stuff works, and once you realise it, it actually makes sense.

            The problem is that import works in the way that it makes the imported module available in the context of where your import is.

            Lets' assume your module is in 'my_package' folder. Your code is available then as my_package.code. And once you use from dag_common.connections import get_conn in code module - the imported get_conn becomes available as .... my_package.code.get_conn

            And in this case you need to patch my_package.code.get_conn not the original package you imported get_conn from.

            Once you realise this, patching becomes much easier.


            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network


            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install calabash-location-mocking

            You can download it from GitHub.
            You can use calabash-location-mocking like any standard Java library. Please include the the jar files in your classpath. You can also use any IDE and you can run and debug the calabash-location-mocking component as you would do with any other Java program. Best practice is to use a build tool that supports dependency management such as Maven or Gradle. For Maven installation, please refer For Gradle installation, please refer .


            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
          • HTTPS


          • CLI

            gh repo clone testmunk/calabash-location-mocking

          • sshUrl


          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link