vertx-web | HTTP web applications for Vert.x | HTTP library

I am using LoggerHandler in a vertx web project. I am a bit confused about the output of the logger:

I have a Quarkus project that expose some REST Endpoints. When working on dev mode or running from the local build docker container all work fine, those endpoints annotated with @RolesAllowed and @PermitAll work as supposed to be. But when I deploy to a AWS service with the following steps:

1. Commit to Gitlab
2. Run Gitlab CICD
3. Send result with the config to an AWS S3 Bucket
4. Trigger AWS codepipeline
5. Deploy to Elastic Bean using docker image

After that the container is deployed all endpoints with @PermitAll work fine but those with @RolesAllowed responds with 401 Unauthorized, the token sent to those endpoints is valid, it is correctly formed and has not expired.

I'm trying to learn Vert.x by creating a small ReST API. Everything went smooth until I added the database backend. I chose Postgres as a database. My issue comes when a java.time LocalDate is being parsed into JSON. As far as I understand I need the jackson backend to parse it. I added it into my classpath through maven dependencies. The dependcy is there but the framework spits an Exception as it can't find the jackson plugin called jackson-datatype-jsr310. Well it IS there so i'm a bit stuck...

I am using Vert.x 4 and java 16, I develop on Windows 10 with IntelliJ IDEA.

navigating async, non blocking, and reactiveness is a handfull... given 2 non blocking, reactive, vert.x/quarkus based, micro services A and B, where the constraint is that A MUST communicate with B via http. in case I want to keep service A reactive (non blocking):

1. should I use vertx-web-client? the docs state its an async client, but I assume that being vert.x based its non blocking as well? (i am distinguishing between async and non blocking here)
2. in Quarkus, I see that a clone/sibling of the vertx-web-client, which is Mutiny specific, is used. Is this so that we can use Mutiny higher level APIs (like Uni/Multi). will I still get the same non blocking 'reactivity'?
3. Java 11 has a new web client which is stated as async and reactive (I think reactive in the sense of supporting reactive streams. not sure if its the ame meaning). If I try to use this in my service A to communicate with B, will I still get the non blocking nature? or will it break it because its not vert.x based and not using netty for example? like I said I have my handsfull and my mind exploding :)

Any help would be great. thanks

I created a new Quarkus app using the following command:

Warning message

WARN [io.qua.hib.orm.dep.HibernateOrmProcessor] Could not find a suitable persistence unit for model classes:
- io.quarkus.hibernate.orm.panache.kotlin.PanacheEntity
- io.quarkus.hibernate.orm.panache.kotlin.PanacheEntityBase

The same issue with both io.quarkus:quarkus-hibernate-orm-panache and io.quarkus:quarkus-hibernate-orm-panache-kotlin (PanacheCompanion).

My project has multiple named persistent units and datasources (no default). I'm also using multitenant feature.

INFO [io.quarkus] Installed features: [agroal, cache, cdi, config-yaml, hibernate-orm, hibernate-orm-panache-kotlin, jdbc-mysql, kotlin, mutiny, narayana-jta, resteasy, resteasy-jackson, security, smallrye-context-propagation, smallrye-jwt, smallrye-openapi, swagger-ui, vertx, vertx-web]

In my quarkus project, I have added the following dependencies to create a non-blocking asynchronous project

This is the complete error message:

"static interface method invocations are not supported in -source 7 (use -source 8 or higher to enable static interface method invocations)"

Here is the class:

´´´