Guava | 420 Signer - The most powerful signing utility | iOS library

The log shows that the ResourcesPlugin is being found but its plug-in activator is getting a null pointer exception when it tries to get the IContentTypeManager.

The content type manager is provided using OSGi declarative services but you have not included org.apache.felix.scr which deals with this.

So at a minimum you need to include org.apache.felix.scr and start it in the section:

why does in Java the call coll.contains(null) fail for ImmutableCollections?

Because the design team (the ones who have created guava) decided that, for their collections, null is unwanted, and therefore any interaction between their collections and a null check, even in this case, should just throw to highlight to the programmer, at the earliest possible opportunity, that there is a mismatch. Even where the established behaviour (as per the existing implementations in the core runtime itself, such as ArrayList and friends, as well as the javadoc), rather explicitly go the other way and say that a non-sequitur check (is this pear part of this list of apples?) strongly suggests that the right move is to just return false and not throw.

In other words, guava messed up. But now that they have done so, going back is potentially backwards compatibility breaking. It really isn't very - you are replacing an exception thrown with a false return value; presumably code could be out there that relies on the NPE (catching it and doing something different from what the code would do had contains(null) returned false instead of throwing) - but that's a rare case, and guava breaks backwards compatibility all the time.

And how can I properly check for nulls in a Collection in general?

By calling .contains(null), just as you are. The fact that guava doesn't do it right doesn't change the answer. You might as well ask 'how do I add elements to a list', and counter the answer of "well, you call list.add(item) to do that" with: Well, I have this implementation of the List interface that plays Rick Astley over the speaker instead of adding to the list, so, I reject your answer.

That's.. how java and interfaces work: You can have implementations of them, and the only guardianship that they do what the interface dictates they must, is that the author understands there is a contract that needs to be followed.

Now, normally a library so badly written they break contract for no good reason*, isn't popular. But guava IS popular. Very popular. That gets at a simple truth: No library is perfect. Guava's API design is generally quite good (in my opinion, vastly superior to e.g. Apache commons libraries), and the team actively spends a lot of time debating proper API design, in the sense that the code that one would write using guava is nice (as defined by: Easy to understand, has few surprises, easy to maintain, easy to test, and probably easy to mutate to deal with changing requirements - the only useful definition for nebulous terms like 'nice' or 'elegant' code - it's code that does those things, anything else is pointless aesthetic drivel). In other words, they are actively trying, and they usually get it right.

Just, not in this case. Work around it: return item != null && coll.contains(item); will get the job done.

There is one major argument in favour of guava's choice: They 'contract break' is an implicit break - one would expect that .contains(null) works, and always returns false, but it's not explicitly stated in the javadoc that one must do this. Contrast to e.g. IdentityHashMap, which uses identity equivalence (a==b) and not value equality (a.equals(b)) in its .containsKey etc implementations, which explicitly goes against the javadoc contract as stated in the j.u.Map interface. IHM has an excellent reason for it, and highlights the discrepancy, plus explains the reason, in the javadoc. Guava isn't nearly as clear about their bizarre null behaviour, but, here's a crucial thing about null in java:

Its meaning is nebulous. Sometimes it means 'empty', which is bad design: You should never write if (x == null || x.isEmpty()) - that implies some API is badly coded. If null is semantically equivalent to some value (such as "" or List.of()), then you should just return "" or List.of(), and not null. However, in such a design, list.contains(null) == false) would make sense.

But sometimes null means not found, irrelevant, not applicable, or unknown (for example, if map.get(k) returns null, that's what it means: Not found. Not 'I found an empty value for you'). This matches with what NULL means in e.g. SQL. In all those cases, .contains(null) should be returning neither true nor false. If I hand you a bag of marbles and ask you if there is a marble in there that is grue, and you have no idea what grue means, you shouldn't answer either yes or no to my query: Either answer is a meaningless guess. You should tell me that the question cannot be answered. Which is best represented in java by throwing, which is precisely what guava does. This also matches with what NULL does in SQL. In SQL, v IN (x) returns one of 3 values, not 2 values: It can resolve to true, false, or null. v IN (NULL) would resolve to NULL and not false. It is answering a question that can't be answered with the NULL value, which is to be read as: Don't know.

In other words, guava made a call on what null implies which evidently does not match with your definitions, as you expect .contains(null) to return false. I think your viewpoint is more idiomatic, but the point is, guava's viewpoint is different but also consistent, and the javadoc merely insinuates, but does not explicitly demand, that .contains(null) returns false.

That's not useful whatsoever in fixing your code, but hopefully it gives you a mental model, and answers your question of "why does it work like this?".

You either need to disable the dependencyConvergence check in the POM, or you need to add an entry to the section of your POM which contains the version of error_prone_annotations that you want to use.

Using print statements, I noticed that IDs were being checked against themselves i.e., id1 == id2 when two different cells had the same value. The solution was to catch this case and return 0 (when two Integer objects have the same value).

The comparator used is then:

Credit: https://stackoverflow.com/a/44686333/6660373 You need to add background before updating your fruits and basket. add these two lines:

I openned two JIRA to understand this problem. See the links below:

1. https://datastax-oss.atlassian.net/browse/SPARKC-652
2. https://datastax-oss.atlassian.net/browse/JAVA-2945

Ok, the issue seems to be with having the members of Bar already declared in the constructor. I.e., replacing this

You did not provide the type of publication, so you use just a basic Publication. from() is a function of MavenPublication, so you need to explicitly specify that you need a MavenPublication:

Some simple steps and you are done with this task:

1. put the guava.jar file in a directory inside the project (e.g. lib)
2. if you have just one dependency go in the project explorer and right-click on guava-30...jar and choose "Add as library"
3. if you know there are more dependencies right-click on the "lib" folder and choose "Add as library..."
4. File - Project Structure - Artifacts - press "+" - JAR - from Modules...
5. choose the Main class of your project and "OK"
6. generate the jar: Build - Build Artifacts - Build
7. you now have a folder in your project "out" - artifacts with the generated project jar

Just a note (not valid for Guava): if you are using signed jars like Bouncy Castle you will notice that this doesn't work like describes because the "including" of the external dependency file in the project jar will destroy the signature.