dockerized | Boilerplate to start with Docker setup | Continuous Deployment library

 by   KumarAbhirup JavaScript Version: Current License: MIT

kandi X-RAY | dockerized Summary

kandi X-RAY | dockerized Summary

dockerized is a JavaScript library typically used in Devops, Continuous Deployment, Webpack, Boilerplate, Docker applications. dockerized has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Boilerplate to start with Docker setup (Next.js included)
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              dockerized has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 78 star(s) with 26 fork(s). There are 1 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 0 open issues and 1 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 8 days. There are 10 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of dockerized is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              dockerized has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              dockerized has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              dockerized code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              dockerized is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              dockerized releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of dockerized
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            dockerized Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for dockerized.

            dockerized Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for dockerized.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            proxying from containerized production react to containerized flask
            Asked 2021-Jun-15 at 16:20

            I am trying to proxy requests from my containerized React application to my containerized Flask application.

            I was starting the application using npm start (in Docker), and I did not have any issues proxying requests. However, I learned that npm start is not a good way to proceed in production.

            Following the advice here: Run a React App in a Docker Container , I am able to start my containerized production React, but now the requests are not proxied.

            Within the React app, all requests are handled with axios and are formatted: "/api/v1/endpoint". It seems that others have had issues between "http://localhost:80/api/v1/endpoint" and "/api/v1/endpoint". I do not believe this is my issue, unless it arises only in the production environment.

            I have also tried changing my "proxy" address in package.json to the location of the dockerized flask container, and later to the name of the docker container, but I have not been able to make either solution work.

            If anyone can provide guidance on launching a containerized, production React app that proxies requests to a backend container, please advise.

            I am open to using a different server, if the procedures in "Run a React App in a Docker Container" need to be updated.

            I have looked these solutions:

            Proxy React requests to Flask app using Docker

            Flask, React in a Docker: How to Proxy

            Posting from React to Flask

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 16:20

            After digging around and trying a bunch of solutions, here is what worked:

            1.) I changed my docker file to run an nginx server:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67829521

            QUESTION

            Kafka connector "Unable to connect to the server" - dockerized kafka-connect worker that connects to confluent cloud
            Asked 2021-Jun-11 at 14:28

            I'm following similar example as in this blog post:

            https://rmoff.net/2019/11/12/running-dockerised-kafka-connect-worker-on-gcp/

            Except that I'm not running kafka connect worker on GCP but locally.

            Everything is fine I run the docker-compose up and kafka connect starts but when I try to create instance of source connector via CURL I get the following ambiguous message (Note: there is literally no log being outputed in the kafka connect logs):

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-11 at 14:27

            I managed to get it to work, this is a correct configuration...

            The message "Unable to connect to the server" was because I had wrongly deployed mongo instance so it's not related to kafka-connect or confluent cloud.

            I'm going to leave this question as an example if somebody struggles with this in the future. It took me a while to figure out how to configure docker-compose for kafka-connect that connects to confluent cloud.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67938139

            QUESTION

            Let my Firebase application trigger microservice exclusively
            Asked 2021-Jun-09 at 22:04

            I have a Google VM running my dockerized application and i also have my Firebase front end application.

            I want my Firebase application to trigger my microservice. The thing is, i want to be security conscious and i want the Firebase app to be the only actor who can trigger the microservice.

            What is the best option for such a task? The only thing i have found are json web tokens (jwts). Is this good enough for the job? Is there something better?

            If jwts are what is needed, then what is the logic that the code should have? Should the server create a key and send it to the microservice, then the microservice should decode it and only if it matches a value it should proceed with the job?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-08 at 18:51

            firebaser here

            The new Firebase App Check feature was made for this sort of thing, but how to access such app tokens from your own server-side code isn't decided yet.

            So App Check currently allows specific Firebase services to only allow traffic from apps that are registered in the project. You are looking for the other side of that: only allow traffic from those apps to your services, which is not supported yet.

            Also see https://groups.google.com/g/firebase-talk/c/rU0fEozdMyc/m/AYUa6PpLCAAJ

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67889249

            QUESTION

            Celery showing django's runserver logs instead of celery logs
            Asked 2021-Jun-08 at 02:26

            I have a dockerized Django project and everything works fine because Celery keeps displaying runserver logs instead of celery logs.

            Here's my docker-compose.yml:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-08 at 02:26

            Remove the ENTRYPOINT ["sh", "./entrypoint.sh"] from your Dockerfile and rebuild your images again.

            I hope that will do the job.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67880500

            QUESTION

            ASP.NET Core disable HTTPS
            Asked 2021-Jun-07 at 18:07

            I have a dockerized ASP.NET Core app that I'm trying to run locally under Linux (Fedora 33). I'd like to disable HTTPS so I don't have to deal with constant certificate errors.

            To do this I simply disabled the HTTPS redirect feature which is included by default, however the app then wasn't responding to any HTTP requests at all.

            I managed to get the dev version of the app to run on HTTP by explicitly configuring Kestrel in Startup.cs:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-06 at 21:18

            1st cheek by other browser or cheek blocking antivirus or firewall of your PC may interrupted it. then change the port number before by cheeking the ip and port number by ip scanner.

            as you now when you need change http to https need SSL certificate , so set disable option Tools->option->environment->webbrowsers

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67863600

            QUESTION

            Azure Subscription can't be found when I sign into Azure via Dockerized env
            Asked 2021-Jun-07 at 08:27

            I have a strange situation where when I use a local powershell script in my visual studio project that logs in using a service principal and then is able to associate a specific subscription.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-07 at 08:27

            As far as I know, the output of the command az login --service-principal --username $AZ_APPLICATION_CLIENT_ID --password $AZ_SECRET --tenant $TENANT --allow-no-subscriptions also includes the subscription ID like "id": "" instead of "id": "" in your output. You can show the default subscription with the command az account show.

            I found that there are two variables $APPLICATION_CLIENT_ID and $APPLICATION_ID in your questions. Not sure you have a typo or using the wrong variable there. Please make sure you input the correct subscription id value when you run az account set -s and other parameters values via echo the environment variable value.

            You can also get a list of subscriptions for the logged-in account with the command az account list and check if the subscription Id does exist in the specific tenant.

            At last, you may need to re-auth the CLI with az login. Or, by comparing the Az CLI version with your local workstation, you may need to reinstall or upgrade it.

            Edit

            You can verify if the service principal indeed belongs to the subscription. Search the display name of App registration in the IAM of subscriptions.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67828274

            QUESTION

            Benefits of deploying using docker-compose
            Asked 2021-Jun-06 at 18:01

            If I am wrong at anything below, correct me pls.

            Let's say I have simple frontend application (React, Vue, Angular, whatever) and then backend (Node.js or any RestAPI provider).

            I am able to run both of them separately (not using docker), or both dockerized using docker-compose.

            Approach 1: When not using docker, I need to deploy my application to 2 separate servers.

            Approach 2: When using docker-compose, this allows me to deploy everything to a single server (like heroku). Frontend would be under default http port 80, backend would be for example under port 81.

            I can already see that a huge benefit of approach 2) is that I don't need to pay for 2 hostings.

            My questions are:

            1. What is the speed comparison for both approaches of requests going from frontend to backend (I mean it for Server side rendering like Nuxt.js or Next.js). Is approach 2 going to be faster because it is on the same server?
            2. What are the other pros and cons which I am missing?

            Thank you

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-06 at 18:01

            There's no reason why you can't deploy your frontend and backend to the same server whether or not you use Docker and Docker Compose.

            Using containers provides a mechanism by which you can package applications and publish these to registries and deploy them to other machines with a high degree of confidence that they will run on the other machines without change, now and in the future.

            Without Docker, you need to provide scripts or some other form of deployment that can install the apps on other machines and, unless these other machines are perfect clones of your development host, you'll likely need to install other OS and software dependencies too.

            So, Docker facilitates distribution and packaging of apps and it helps ensure multiple apps run on a single host without (unexpected) interactions between applications.

            If you use containers but not Docker Compose, you need to provide scripts (or similar) that describes how your app (components: frontend|backend) interact and combine: which ports they use, their env environment (variables) etc. Docker Compose facilitates this and provides a convenient mechanism to describe how to combine the pieces into a coherent whole.

            There are fully functional alternatives to Docker and Docker Compose but Docker and Docker Compose are widely used and you can assume that platform providers and prospective users of your app, are willing|able to use both of them.

            Neither Docker nor Docker Compose add a performance overhead to your app. Both are primarily programmers of the control plane (so-called east-west) rather than your app's data plane (so-called north-south).

            Running your app on a single server will almost always be more performant than running on multiple servers -- regardless of whether or not you use containers -- because you can avoid network latency which is a significant contribution to performance.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67861665

            QUESTION

            Set spark context configuration prioritizing spark-submit
            Asked 2021-Jun-02 at 10:36

            I'm building a dockerized spark application, which will be run through an entrypoint.sh file which in turn runs a spark-submit:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-02 at 10:36

            I managed to solve it. Initializing the SparkContext first, and retrieving all parameters set via spark-submit did it. The steps would be as follows:

            • Initialize SparkContext
            • Retrieve all previously set configuration via sc.getConf()
            • Set all remaining configuration using SparkConf().setIfMissing()

            The last step enables to prioritize the configuration set via spark-submit. That way, only parameters that have not been previously set are set through this method. In code, that would be:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67792257

            QUESTION

            support of Dockerization in new version of SAP Hybris
            Asked 2021-Jun-01 at 08:30

            I'm trying to build a job in Jenkins which will responsible for launching SAP Hybris in docker environment,

            for the 1808.5 version, I can find a recipe for docker as b2c_acc_dockerized where i can generate dockerfiles to build images of SAP Hybris, but for new version like 1905 and new version there is no recipe for docker,

            did they not support docker recipe anymore ? Please help

            what do you propose for me to do the job

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-01 at 08:30

            Docker is still supported after 1811. It's all described on the SAP Help

            You can either create your own recipe. Or make use of the ant command createPlatformImageStructure

            Recipe

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67776635

            QUESTION

            Docker not able to install git on Ubuntu container
            Asked 2021-May-28 at 15:09

            I have a Docker image that uses ubuntu:21.04. When I SSH onto it I try to install git using the official Git Ubuntu installation instructions but I get an error:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-28 at 15:09

            Add to your docker file:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67740269

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install dockerized

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/KumarAbhirup/dockerized.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone KumarAbhirup/dockerized

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:KumarAbhirup/dockerized.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link