dockerized | Boilerplate to start with Docker setup | Continuous Deployment library
kandi X-RAY | dockerized Summary
kandi X-RAY | dockerized Summary
Boilerplate to start with Docker setup (Next.js included)
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of dockerized
dockerized Key Features
dockerized Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on dockerized
QUESTION
I am trying to proxy requests from my containerized React application to my containerized Flask application.
I was starting the application using npm start (in Docker), and I did not have any issues proxying requests. However, I learned that npm start is not a good way to proceed in production.
Following the advice here: Run a React App in a Docker Container , I am able to start my containerized production React, but now the requests are not proxied.
Within the React app, all requests are handled with axios and are formatted: "/api/v1/endpoint". It seems that others have had issues between "http://localhost:80/api/v1/endpoint" and "/api/v1/endpoint". I do not believe this is my issue, unless it arises only in the production environment.
I have also tried changing my "proxy" address in package.json to the location of the dockerized flask container, and later to the name of the docker container, but I have not been able to make either solution work.
If anyone can provide guidance on launching a containerized, production React app that proxies requests to a backend container, please advise.
I am open to using a different server, if the procedures in "Run a React App in a Docker Container" need to be updated.
I have looked these solutions:
Proxy React requests to Flask app using Docker
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 16:20After digging around and trying a bunch of solutions, here is what worked:
1.) I changed my docker file to run an nginx server:
QUESTION
I'm following similar example as in this blog post:
https://rmoff.net/2019/11/12/running-dockerised-kafka-connect-worker-on-gcp/
Except that I'm not running kafka connect worker on GCP but locally.
Everything is fine I run the docker-compose up and kafka connect starts but when I try to create instance of source connector via CURL I get the following ambiguous message (Note: there is literally no log being outputed in the kafka connect logs):
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-11 at 14:27I managed to get it to work, this is a correct configuration...
The message "Unable to connect to the server" was because I had wrongly deployed mongo instance so it's not related to kafka-connect or confluent cloud.
I'm going to leave this question as an example if somebody struggles with this in the future. It took me a while to figure out how to configure docker-compose for kafka-connect that connects to confluent cloud.
QUESTION
I have a Google VM running my dockerized application and i also have my Firebase front end application.
I want my Firebase application to trigger my microservice. The thing is, i want to be security conscious and i want the Firebase app to be the only actor who can trigger the microservice.
What is the best option for such a task? The only thing i have found are json web tokens (jwts). Is this good enough for the job? Is there something better?
If jwts are what is needed, then what is the logic that the code should have? Should the server create a key and send it to the microservice, then the microservice should decode it and only if it matches a value it should proceed with the job?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-08 at 18:51firebaser here
The new Firebase App Check feature was made for this sort of thing, but how to access such app tokens from your own server-side code isn't decided yet.
So App Check currently allows specific Firebase services to only allow traffic from apps that are registered in the project. You are looking for the other side of that: only allow traffic from those apps to your services, which is not supported yet.
Also see https://groups.google.com/g/firebase-talk/c/rU0fEozdMyc/m/AYUa6PpLCAAJ
QUESTION
I have a dockerized Django project and everything works fine because Celery keeps displaying runserver logs instead of celery logs.
Here's my docker-compose.yml:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-08 at 02:26Remove the ENTRYPOINT ["sh", "./entrypoint.sh"]
from your Dockerfile and rebuild your images again.
I hope that will do the job.
QUESTION
I have a dockerized ASP.NET Core app that I'm trying to run locally under Linux (Fedora 33). I'd like to disable HTTPS so I don't have to deal with constant certificate errors.
To do this I simply disabled the HTTPS redirect feature which is included by default, however the app then wasn't responding to any HTTP requests at all.
I managed to get the dev version of the app to run on HTTP by explicitly configuring Kestrel in Startup.cs:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-06 at 21:181st cheek by other browser or cheek blocking antivirus or firewall of your PC may interrupted it. then change the port number before by cheeking the ip and port number by ip scanner.
as you now when you need change http to https need SSL certificate , so set disable option Tools->option->environment->webbrowsers
QUESTION
I have a strange situation where when I use a local powershell script in my visual studio project that logs in using a service principal and then is able to associate a specific subscription.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-07 at 08:27As far as I know, the output of the command az login --service-principal --username $AZ_APPLICATION_CLIENT_ID --password $AZ_SECRET --tenant $TENANT --allow-no-subscriptions
also includes the subscription ID like "id": ""
instead of "id": ""
in your output. You can show the default subscription with the command az account show
.
I found that there are two variables $APPLICATION_CLIENT_ID
and $APPLICATION_ID
in your questions. Not sure you have a typo or using the wrong variable there. Please make sure you input the correct subscription id value when you run az account set -s
and other parameters values via echo the environment variable value.
You can also get a list of subscriptions for the logged-in account with the command az account list
and check if the subscription Id does exist in the specific tenant.
At last, you may need to re-auth the CLI with az login
. Or, by comparing the Az CLI version with your local workstation, you may need to reinstall or upgrade it.
You can verify if the service principal indeed belongs to the subscription. Search the display name of App registration in the IAM of subscriptions.
QUESTION
If I am wrong at anything below, correct me pls.
Let's say I have simple frontend application (React, Vue, Angular, whatever) and then backend (Node.js or any RestAPI provider).
I am able to run both of them separately (not using docker), or both dockerized using docker-compose.
Approach 1: When not using docker, I need to deploy my application to 2 separate servers.
Approach 2: When using docker-compose, this allows me to deploy everything to a single server (like heroku). Frontend would be under default http port 80, backend would be for example under port 81.
I can already see that a huge benefit of approach 2) is that I don't need to pay for 2 hostings.
My questions are:
- What is the speed comparison for both approaches of requests going from frontend to backend (I mean it for Server side rendering like Nuxt.js or Next.js). Is approach 2 going to be faster because it is on the same server?
- What are the other pros and cons which I am missing?
Thank you
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-06 at 18:01There's no reason why you can't deploy your frontend and backend to the same server whether or not you use Docker and Docker Compose.
Using containers provides a mechanism by which you can package applications and publish these to registries and deploy them to other machines with a high degree of confidence that they will run on the other machines without change, now and in the future.
Without Docker, you need to provide scripts or some other form of deployment that can install the apps on other machines and, unless these other machines are perfect clones of your development host, you'll likely need to install other OS and software dependencies too.
So, Docker facilitates distribution and packaging of apps and it helps ensure multiple apps run on a single host without (unexpected) interactions between applications.
If you use containers but not Docker Compose, you need to provide scripts (or similar) that describes how your app (components: frontend|backend) interact and combine: which ports they use, their env environment (variables) etc. Docker Compose facilitates this and provides a convenient mechanism to describe how to combine the pieces into a coherent whole.
There are fully functional alternatives to Docker and Docker Compose but Docker and Docker Compose are widely used and you can assume that platform providers and prospective users of your app, are willing|able to use both of them.
Neither Docker nor Docker Compose add a performance overhead to your app. Both are primarily programmers of the control plane (so-called east-west) rather than your app's data plane (so-called north-south).
Running your app on a single server will almost always be more performant than running on multiple servers -- regardless of whether or not you use containers -- because you can avoid network latency which is a significant contribution to performance.
QUESTION
I'm building a dockerized spark application, which will be run through an entrypoint.sh
file which in turn runs a spark-submit
:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-02 at 10:36I managed to solve it. Initializing the SparkContext
first, and retrieving all parameters set via spark-submit
did it. The steps would be as follows:
- Initialize
SparkContext
- Retrieve all previously set configuration via
sc.getConf()
- Set all remaining configuration using
SparkConf().setIfMissing()
The last step enables to prioritize the configuration set via spark-submit
. That way, only parameters that have not been previously set are set through this method.
In code, that would be:
QUESTION
I'm trying to build a job in Jenkins which will responsible for launching SAP Hybris in docker environment,
for the 1808.5 version, I can find a recipe for docker as b2c_acc_dockerized where i can generate dockerfiles to build images of SAP Hybris, but for new version like 1905 and new version there is no recipe for docker,
did they not support docker recipe anymore ? Please help
what do you propose for me to do the job
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-01 at 08:30Docker is still supported after 1811. It's all described on the SAP Help
You can either create your own recipe. Or make use of the ant command createPlatformImageStructure
QUESTION
I have a Docker image that uses ubuntu:21.04
. When I SSH onto it I try to install git using the official Git Ubuntu installation instructions but I get an error:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-28 at 15:09Add to your docker file:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install dockerized
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page