lectric | A touch-enabled , hardware-accelerated , slider | Mobile library

by brettbuddin JavaScript Version: Current License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(3)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | lectric Summary

lectric is a JavaScript library typically used in Mobile applications. lectric has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Lectric is a JavaScript slider that is touch-enabled and takes advantage of hardware acceleration. It looks awesome on Apple touch devices. You can see an early version of this software implemented on mckinney.com.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

lectric has a low active ecosystem.

It has 117 star(s) with 19 fork(s). There are 3 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 3 open issues and 7 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 36 days. There are 2 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of lectric is current.

Quality

lectric has no bugs reported.

Security

lectric has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

lectric is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

lectric releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of lectric

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

lectric Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for lectric.

lectric Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for lectric.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on lectric

How can I get my page to display scaled without scrolling?

Azure Search: How do I ensure all combinations of gender and plurality are included in my results?

Syntax Error Insert into statement visual C# and ms access

QUESTION

How can I get my page to display scaled without scrolling?

Asked 2018-Nov-11 at 08:07

So a buddy of mine encountered an issue, the website displays properly when on a screen that's 1440px by 1024px, however on a smaller screen you have to scroll to see further down. We've both been searching and can't figure it out, now it could be the fact that it's made primarily from pngs that the scaling doesn't work properly or it could also be that we're both idiots and it's actually very simple, whichever the case we can't figure it out So hopefully someone can. Overflow-y:hidden will not fix the problem as that would only prevent scrolling and the content of the page stays as is. We've also tried getting JS to detect the window size and it also doesn't seem to work.

Here it is at 100% zoom on a 1366px by 768px screen https://imgur.com/LN6YJUJ

This is what he wants it to look like without the scrolling of course (This is at 65% zoom same screen) https://imgur.com/97vjDs0

Here's the CSS and HTML (it won't run due to missing files but I assume the issue would be in these)

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Nov-11 at 08:07

SO, i'm 100% certain that it has a scroll on my screen because of the odd sizing HOW ever the issue was resolved, it turns out the person who was receiving the website didn't have their zoom set to 100% so it looked weird for them..... sigh... some people....

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53137915

QUESTION

Azure Search: How do I ensure all combinations of gender and plurality are included in my results?

Asked 2018-Jul-14 at 13:32

I am facing a business requirement for a French website that requires matching masculine/feminine/singular and plural versions of a word. The easiest way to describe this is to show the requirement itself in this question.

Req 1 - search for chien (masculine/singular)

The following words should be included in the search results:

chien (masculine/singular)
chiens (masculine/plural)
chienne (feminine/singular)
chiennes (feminine/plural)

When I researched this requirement, I used the Analyze API with "fr.microsoft" analyzer to quickly test the various scenarios.

Request #1

{ "analyzer": "fr.microsoft", "text": "chien" }

Response #1

chien

Request #2

{ "analyzer": "fr.microsoft", "text": "chiens" }

Response #2

chien
chiens

Request #3

{ "analyzer": "fr.microsoft", "text": "chienne" }

Response #3

chien
chienner
chienne

Request #4

{ "analyzer": "fr.microsoft", "text": "chiennes" }

Response #4

chien
chienner
chiennes

Req 2 - search for lecteur (masculine/singular)

The following words should be included in the search results:

lecteur (masculine/singular)
lecteurs (masculine/plural)
lectrice (feminine/singular)
lectrices (feminine/plural)

I again used the Analyze API with "fr.microsoft" analyzer to quickly test the various scenarios.

Request #1

{ "analyzer": "fr.microsoft", "text": "lecteur" }

Response #1

lecteur

Request #2

{ "analyzer": "fr.microsoft", "text": "chiens" }

Response #2

lecteur
lecteurs

Request #3

{ "analyzer": "fr.microsoft", "text": "lectrice" }

Response #3

lecteur
lectrice

Request #4

{ "analyzer": "fr.microsoft", "text": "lectrices" }

Response #4

lecteur
lectrices

My Impressions and Questions

My initial impression is that searching "chiennes" would not match a document containing "chienne" because "chiennes" is only broken down to the following: chien, chienner, chiennes.
Is that impression correct? Or will searching "chiennes" still return a document containing "chienne" because the search term "chiennes" gets tokenized to chien,chienner,chiennes while the document itself would have "chienne" tokenized to chien,chienner,chienne, so there would ultimately be a match. Note that I italicized the search and index tokens that I think would match.
Note that the 2 example requirements above may actually end up being a duplicate of my femme vs femmes S.O. question I posted earlier today: Azure Search: Searching for singular version of a word, but still include plural version in results

Requirement Example 3 - search MELEE

The following words should be included in the search results:

MELEE
MÊLEE
Mêlée
mêlant
melee
mêlé
mELer

Request #1

{ "analyzer": "fr.microsoft", "text": "MELEE" }

Response #1

melee

Request #2

{ "analyzer": "fr.microsoft", "text": "MÊLEE" }

Response #2

melee
mêlee

Request #3

{ "analyzer": "fr.microsoft", "text": "Mêlée" }

Response #3

meler
mêler
mele
mêle
melee
mêlee

Request #3

{ "analyzer": "fr.microsoft", "text": "mêlant" }

Response #3

meler
mêler
melant
mêlant

In this example, I could continue on with analyze API calls, but here I can compare against the existing website (whose functionality we need to reproduce) and the new website. The existing website allows me to search for "melee" and it will find documents with "mêlant". Screenshot of existing website

But based on the results from Analyze API, I can see that searching "melee" would not find "mêlant" because "melee" only gets tokenized to "melee" while "mêlant" only gets tokenized to meler, mêler, melant and mêlant. There is no match here.

My Impressions and Questions

I used Google Translate and can see that "melee" means "scrimmage" or "brawl".
I used Google Translate and can see that "mêlant" means "mixing".
Is this why a search for "melee" would not match "mêlant"?
What are my options if the business demands they match? Would I have to use synonyms? If not, what are my options here?
Please note that the existing website uses SOLR and we are not given access to any of the existing code or how SOLR is used. We have had to reverse engineer everything.
I did manage to get my hands on the SOLR configuration and it looks like this is how their current SOLR configuration is setup for the french language. It looks like they use a dictionary of some sort.

Please advise.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Feb-09 at 00:15

I think I answered the first and second requirement in your other post: Azure Search: Searching for singular version of a word, but still include plural version in results, let me know if I missed something.

With regard to the third requirement, I suspect what happens is that the website you're referring to is using an aggressive stemming strategy. It means that both of the words melee or mêlant are reduced to the same root. On top of stemming they might be using fuzzy search or other query expansions methods, like synonym expansion. The question is whether you want documents with mêlant match the word melee, provided they mean different things.

Both fuzzy search and synonym expansion are possible in Azure Search. You can also experiment with custom analyzers to take control over how stemming is done. We use Lucene components that are the same as the ones used in SOLR so you should be able to replicate the same analyzer configuration in most cases.

Hope that helps.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42097010

QUESTION

Syntax Error Insert into statement visual C# and ms access

Asked 2017-Feb-18 at 10:28

Every time I try to run, error pop ups saying

Syntax Error Insert Into

I've tried changing the statement by putting [] braces as there are no reserved keyword.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Feb-18 at 10:28

The error is in this part of query:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42313662

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install lectric

Put this in your <head>:.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: