re-consent | Consent-management browser extension | Browser Plugin library

by cliqz-oss JavaScript Version: 1.0.9 License: MPL-2.0

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(4)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | re-consent Summary

re-consent is a JavaScript library typically used in Plugin, Browser Plugin applications. re-consent has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Weak Copyleft License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Consent-management browser extension

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

re-consent has a low active ecosystem.

It has 106 star(s) with 15 fork(s). There are 10 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 3 open issues and 1 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 2 days. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of re-consent is 1.0.9

Quality

re-consent has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

re-consent has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

re-consent code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

re-consent is licensed under the MPL-2.0 License. This license is Weak Copyleft.

Weak Copyleft licenses have some restrictions, but you can use them in commercial projects.

Reuse

re-consent releases are available to install and integrate.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

re-consent saves you 139 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.

It has 349 lines of code, 0 functions and 44 files.

It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of re-consent

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

re-consent Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for re-consent.

re-consent Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for re-consent.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on re-consent

How will adding permissions to Microsoft Graph App effect existing users?

Azure Active directory API permissions

Microsoft Graph API - new delegated permission removing application permissions

MS Graph API access client tenant with partner credentials

QUESTION

How will adding permissions to Microsoft Graph App effect existing users?

Asked 2020-Jun-21 at 15:43

I have a registered App which requires several application permissions (getting them through Admin Consent flow).

The app is multi-tenant and is already serving a lot of users.

Now I would like to add some more permissions to what the App is requesting and I just want to make sure that adding these permissions won't effect my current users that are using the app.

I understand that in order for the new permissions to apply on existing users, their corresponding organizations admins will have to re-consent, but other than that, I would like to make sure (cant find it in docs) that current users will still be able to use the app the same way as they did before (without the features that requires the new permissions).

Is that really the case? nothing won't 'stop working' because of the permissions change?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Jun-21 at 15:43

When you add permissions to an app registration, previous consents do not get revoked. however depending on the scopes that your app requests, it may force a new consent window to appear. since you are using application permissions, regular users cannot consent to the permissions. for example if your client is requesting a .default scope, then it will try to get all the permissions specified in the api permissions, which would include the new permission (that needs consent). if your token requests only include the old permissions in the scope, then nothing should change. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/develop/v2-permissions-and-consent#example-3-the-user-has-consented-and-the-client-requests-additional-scopes

But, I don't believe that the application will fail even if consent hasn't been given to the new application permissions, but it will fail to receive the new scopes if requested. and any resulting function that uses those additional permissions will fail, until an admin consents to those new permissions.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62495721

QUESTION

Azure Active directory API permissions

Asked 2020-Mar-05 at 02:08

I have got a scenario where I would like to retrieve calendar bookings/meetings from Exchange using Graph APIs. These meetings should only be available in the application running on control/touch panel located in that room. In order to do that, I have registered an App in Azure AD and using MSAL's .NET PublicClientApplication with necessary API permission i.e. Calendars.Read which requires Admin consent and I am using Device code flow in the application which generates a code whenever I try to run the app.

I see that it's also possible to configure a ConfidentialClient which acts on behalf of application and not the user. Also, this requires a pre-consent from Admin.

Question :

Not sure which type of authentication mechanism is best suitable in this Scenario ?
Is it possible to make API permissions for e.g. "Calendars.Read" to work for a specific account? Like in this case just for that room

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Mar-05 at 02:08

Not sure which type of authentication mechanism is best suitable in this Scenario ?

I think both of them could meet your requirement, for the security, I recommend you to use the option one. Something you should note, if you are using the delegated permission Calendars.Read with auth code flow, the user need to log in the App, then the app do operations on behalf of the user, essentially the permission comes from the user.

If you use the application permission Calendars.Read, it uses the client credential flow, the permission comes from the application, it means everyone in the room can use the application to retrieve calendar bookings/meetings.

Is it possible to make API permissions for e.g. "Calendars.Read" to work for a specific account? Like in this case just for that room

No, you could not make the API permission to work just for a specific account.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60532414

QUESTION

Microsoft Graph API - new delegated permission removing application permissions

Asked 2018-Jun-21 at 18:03

I'm using the v1 Azure AD auth URLs (/common/oauth2/authorize) for a multi-tenant app that requires admin_consent.

I've attempted to add a new scope Directory.AccessAsUser.All. It is the first 'delegated' permission I'm requesting when all my other scopes are 'application' level permissions.

When I added that new delegated scope and prompted the admin to re-consent, the other scopes disappeared from the returned AccessToken and the responses scope parameter. Only Directory.AccessAsUser.All is present in the access_token scp field.

Is there any reason this behavior would occur? I'm positive that we are promoting for admin_consent and that an admin is the one consenting.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Jun-21 at 18:03

The scopes specified in the scp will depend on which OAUTH flow you used to obtain the token. You cannot have a single access_token with both Delegated and Application scopes.

Application scopes are applied when using the Client Credentials flow (client_credentials).
Delegated scopes are applied when using either Authorization Code or Implicit flows (authorization_code or implicit).

Update: I've written a more in-depth post about this topic that might help folks facing similar issues: Application vs Delegated Scopes.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48565741

QUESTION

MS Graph API access client tenant with partner credentials

Asked 2017-Nov-24 at 20:34

I use the following PowerShell code to access MS Graph API.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Nov-24 at 20:34

Per the documentation (see the important note at the beginning of the topic), for CSP pre-consent, only Directory and Intune resources in Microsoft Graph supports the partner model. Over time, more resources will support the partner/CSP model. Please create a request for this on UserVoice if this is important to you.

Hope this helps,

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47425687

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install re-consent

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

The extension works by looking for third-party consent management platforms in visited pages. Currently the extension supports the following platforms:.

Find more information at: