awesome-pronunciation | : speech_balloon : How to pronounce Programming words | Dictionary library

by guanpengchn JavaScript Version: Current License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(10)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | awesome-pronunciation Summary

awesome-pronunciation is a JavaScript library typically used in Utilities, Dictionary applications. awesome-pronunciation has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

awesome-pronunciation is a repository which clarifies programming word pronunciation and promotes developers communication. You can preview it here.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

awesome-pronunciation has a low active ecosystem.

It has 91 star(s) with 26 fork(s). There are 5 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 1 open issues and 1 have been closed. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of awesome-pronunciation is current.

Quality

awesome-pronunciation has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

awesome-pronunciation has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

awesome-pronunciation code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

awesome-pronunciation is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

awesome-pronunciation releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of awesome-pronunciation

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

awesome-pronunciation Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for awesome-pronunciation.

awesome-pronunciation Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for awesome-pronunciation.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on Dictionary

Why I can't get dictionary keys by index?

Filter a dictionary of lists

Convert dict to a dataframe with keys repeating for each value?

how Julia determines index of dictionary keys?

Java map function throws non-static method compiler error

In Typescript, how can I convert an Array to a Map and infer K and V if T is a tuple [K, V] while having compile time protection if it isn't

Check if key exists in map storing large values

Add minimum available key to dictionary MongoDB

why could macros not understand a Dict parameter?

Julia convert NamedTuple to Dict

QUESTION

Why I can't get dictionary keys by index?

Asked 2022-Mar-26 at 22:52

Since Python 3.7, dictionaries are ordered. So why I can't get keys by index?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Mar-26 at 21:57

Building in such an API would be an "attractive nuisance": the implementation can't support it efficiently, so better not to tempt people into using an inappropriate data structure.

It's for much the same reason that, e.g., a linked list rarely offers an indexing API. That's totally ordered too, but there's no efficient way to find the i'th element for an arbitrary i. You have to start at the beginning, and follow i links in turn to find the i'th.

Same end result for a CPython dict. It doesn't use a linked list, but same thing in the end: it uses a flat vector under the covers, but basically any number of the vector's entries can be "holes". There's no way to jump over holes short of looking at each entry, one at a time. People expect a[i] to take O(1) (constant) time, not O(i) time.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71632064

QUESTION

Filter a dictionary of lists

Asked 2022-Mar-24 at 07:56

I have a dictionary of the form:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Feb-21 at 05:50

I believe this will work: For each list, we will filter the values where conf is negative, and after that we will filter conf itself.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71184699

QUESTION

Convert dict to a dataframe with keys repeating for each value?

Asked 2022-Feb-21 at 21:29

Given a dict:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Feb-21 at 15:47

You could use a Series and explode:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71209171

QUESTION

how Julia determines index of dictionary keys?

Asked 2022-Jan-29 at 20:05

I confronted strange behavior in Dictionary collection in Julia. a Dictionary can be defined in Julia like this:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Jan-29 at 19:41

The key order in Dict is currently undefined (this might change in the future).

If you want order to be preserved use OrderedDict from DataStructures.jl:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70909065

QUESTION

Java map function throws non-static method compiler error

Asked 2022-Jan-27 at 04:17

I have an odd problem, where I am struggling to understand the nature of "static context" in Java, despite the numerous SO questions regarding the topic.

TL;DR:

I have a design flaw, where ...

This works:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Jan-26 at 17:11

One way to solve the issue is by parameterizing the ParentDTO Class with its own children.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70860253

QUESTION

In Typescript, how can I convert an Array to a Map and infer K and V if T is a tuple [K, V] while having compile time protection if it isn't

Asked 2022-Jan-05 at 18:55

The question in the title pretty much says it all. The catch is that T cannot be restricted.

Here is what I have tried:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Jan-05 at 18:55

If you want the compiler to make calling toMap() an error if T isn't assignable to [K, V] for some K and V, then in some sense it doesn't matter what the output type is in such a case. It could be Map or Map or anything, as long as the toMap() call is a compiler error. I think you'll end up with a runtime error (you can wade through the spec if you really care) so the function won't return... the "actual" return type is never which can be safely widened to Map or anything you want without causing a type safety issue.

Anyway, to make the compiler error happen, you can give toMap() a this parameter which requires this be of ArrayWrapper<[any, any]> or something equivalent. You could use conditional type inference to manually infer K and V from T:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70586968

QUESTION

Check if key exists in map storing large values

Asked 2022-Jan-02 at 18:22

To know a key k exist in a map M1[k]v is very straightforward in Go.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Jan-02 at 18:04

Use if _, ok := M1[k]; ok { }. If you use the blank identifier, the value will not be "loaded".

Let's write benchmarks to test it:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70557883

QUESTION

Add minimum available key to dictionary MongoDB

Asked 2021-Dec-05 at 08:43

I have documents in collection which have structure:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Dec-05 at 08:43

Here is a possibility (requires Mongo 4.2 or better):

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70077265

QUESTION

why could macros not understand a Dict parameter?

Asked 2021-Nov-06 at 05:49

macro test1(name,arg)
    println(arg.args[2])
    typeof(arg.args[2])
end 

@test1 test1 (
  (arg1, (:max=>10))
)

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Nov-06 at 05:49

This is because macros work on code before the code is compiled. Source code is first parsed to Symbols, literals (integers, floats, strings, etc), or Expr (expressions). At this point, all expressions contain only these three things.** After the macro is done and returns an expression, that expression is compiled into runtime code where more complicated objects like Dicts can exist.

The code below illustrates the difference before and after compiling. Note how 1+5 and Dict() were expressions in the macro body, but is afterward evaluated to an Int64 and a Dict.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69632506

QUESTION

Julia convert NamedTuple to Dict

Asked 2021-Oct-30 at 13:52

I would like to convert a NamedTuple to a Dict in Julia. Say I have the following NamedTuple:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Oct-30 at 13:52

The simplest way to get an iterator of keys and values for any key-value collection is pairs:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69755763

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install awesome-pronunciation

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: