box-model | An interactive box model demo | Learning library

you can just remove "position: absolute" and "bottom: 0" from inner-bottom class and that way is working for me.

but if you never heard for flex this maybe is the moment you been waiting for :) here is the solution which is maybe better:

Is this because if we were to use ball, there's a chance we might move the cursor so fast the cursor might leave the box-model of the ball before mousemove would have a chance to execute again?

Yes.

This will happen if you drag an object upwards when your drag-point is also the top row of pixels of the object.

This is less likely to happen if you drag a larger object from its centre and your computer has a mouse with a high poll-rate and a high display refresh rate and the browser is capable of processing OS-provided input events rapidly - so if you're a front-end dev using a high-end gaming machine (with a 1000Hz USB mouse and a 120Hz+ display) may not notice the problem compared to someone using a 100Hz mouse on a 30Hz display (which is a thing: many people run 4K displays over HDMI 1.x which can only run 4K at 30Hz).

Another scenario is when the user is using an absolute pointing device, such as a touch-screen or graphics tablet in absolute-mode (aka "pen mode" for Wacom) rather than relative-mode (aka "mouse mode" for Wacom) - if the user "drags" an object to somewhere else on the screen by only tapping the destination location with their finger (or by moving the stylus vertically outside the detection zone) then there will only be 1 mousemove event which will not be captured by ball at all.

Currently, the ObjectBox code generator doesn't delete entities because it works with partial input information (a single file at a time) and therefore it doesn't know whether you have removed an entity or it will be in the next file the generator is called for.

I've created a follow-up issue/feature request on GH: https://github.com/objectbox/objectbox-generator/issues/22

If you really needed to remove the entity NOW, until the removal feature is added to the generator: the current workaround, would be to manually update the objectbox-model.json, removing the entity JSON code block defining it and adding its uid to the retiredEntityUids list to avoid reuse of the same UID (which would break things). Additionally, the same has to be done for the removed properties, indexes, and relations (each has its retired*Uids list). After the generator is re-run, the entity would be removed from the objectbox-model.go.

I don't recommend doing this as it's easy to make an error when manually editing the model JSON file, potentially causing a loss of data. If you can, wait for the generator to support the removal.

You have wrapped the children of the most outer Div in a list twice, both inside the Build_home_page and in the layout definition, you should remove one of them. Removing the latter, the layout definition would be

Update: the observed behavior could not reproduced with the current version of ObjectBox (e.g. 2.5.1), but with an old version (2.0.0).

Summary:

• You intend to "merge" the properties of two entity types into one
• CardEntity is dropped
• DeckCard gets two additional properties and drops the ToOne to CardEntity

Try using CSS display:contents on the outer element. This display property basically makes the element "invisible" to the browser.

However, I think you'd be better off by refactoring your Vue template to remove the outer element. For example, you could process the objects array to combine its children before doing the loop.

CSS Grid is much better for what you need

for example :

You need to remove the property:

The best way I can see would be wrapping the nav and content in a flexbox:

HTML: