dominators | Various dominator tree algorithms | Learning library
kandi X-RAY | dominators Summary
kandi X-RAY | dominators Summary
Various dominator tree generators. It implements two different methods for finding the immediate dominators of a graph.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Generate a water tree .
- link an array of nodes to its predecessor
- This function is used to iterate the DAG tree
- perform a iteration decision
- Convert text to graph format .
- Traverses the id of a finger s starting at the end of the fingers .
- Recursively visit a tree .
- Creates all the edges of the given node tree
- Create nodes .
- Takes an array of id and returns the result .
dominators Key Features
dominators Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on dominators
QUESTION
I am trying to perform some analysis on llvm IR. For this I try to get the result of the MemorySSAAnalysis pass in each function of a IR module.
However when analyzing the second function, a crash occurs:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-31 at 12:37It seems it was not an issue with the code but with the input data which had debug info (see EDIT2 in the question)
QUESTION
In SAT solving by conflict-driven clause learning, each time a solver detects that a candidate set of variable assignments leads to a conflict, it must look at the causes of the conflict, derive a clause from this (i.e. a lemma in terms of the overall problem) and add it to the set of known clauses. This entails choosing a cut in the implication graph, from which to derive the lemma.
A common way to do this is to pick the first unique implication point.
Per https://users.aalto.fi/~tjunttil/2020-DP-AUT/notes-sat/cdcl.html
A vertex l in the implication graph is a unique implication point (UIP) if all the paths from the latest decision literal vertex to the conflict vertex go through l.
The first UIP by the standard terminology is the first one encountered when backtracking from the conflict.
In alternative terminology, a UIP is a dominator on the implication graph, relative to the latest decision point and the conflict. As such, it could be found by building the implication graph and using a standard algorithm for finding dominators.
But finding dominators can take a nontrivial amount of CPU time, and I get the impression practical CDCL solvers use a faster algorithm specific to this context. However, I have not been able to find anything more specific than 'take the first UIP'.
What is the best known algorithm for finding the first UIP?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-04 at 13:23Without getting into data structural details, we have the implication graph and the trail, which is a prefix of a topological order of the implication graph. We want to pop vertices from the trail until we arrive at a unique implication point – this will be the first.
We recognize the unique implication point by tracking the set of vertices v in the trail such that there exists a path from the last decision literal through v to the conflict literal where the vertex following v in the path does not belong to the trail. Whenever this set consists of a single vertex, that vertex is a unique implication point.
Initially, this set is the two conflicting literals, since the conflict vertex does not belong to the trail. Until the set has one vertex, we pop the vertex v most recently added to the trail. If v belongs to the set, we remove it and add its predecessors (discarding duplicates, natch).
In the example from the linked site, the evolution of the set is
QUESTION
Changing state from other components in this case (Dominator
) is working but when I put those components inside an array and do the same thing the updateCounter
function is getting called but it's not updating the counter
state.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-21 at 04:30The issue is stale state enclosures in the updateCounter
callback. Each mapped element is receiving a callback with the same value of counter
to update from.
Storing instantiated React components in state is also anti-pattern and doesn't help the stale state enclosures. You should store the data only and render the derived JSX from the data.
SolutionUse a functional state update to correctly update from the previous state instead of the state the callback/state update was enclosed in.
Store only the data in the dominators
state and map it to the Dominator
component.
QUESTION
I was given a problem where I need to find the number of dominators in a list. Here is a description of the problem. And here is what I came up with: my solution.
From what I can tell, the code works but when it gets to very large numbers, like the final test, it takes way to long to return anything. I'm pretty sure there's a way to reduce this into a single loop but I have no idea how to do this.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-12 at 17:31there is a linear solution I hope u can use it.
in this way, the pointer move from end to start and if find a new maximum, the counter(n) plus one.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install dominators
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page