NQueens | N-Queens Counting Algorithms in Javascript | Learning library
kandi X-RAY | NQueens Summary
kandi X-RAY | NQueens Summary
N-Queens Counting Algorithms in Javascript
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Initialize the puzzle .
NQueens Key Features
NQueens Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on NQueens
QUESTION
I'm studying the google OR-Tools library and I came across this problem that I can't understand. First of all, I get the same error if I copy and paste the code from the nqueens example in the official guide.
I propose as an example the classic n-queens problem:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-16 at 17:00This requires a recent version of the library. Which one are you using ?
QUESTION
I'm trying to do this nQueens problem and my code looks like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-04 at 08:53vector board(n);
QUESTION
I am new to Optaplanner. I thought I had understood what planning entities are, as well as planning variables, genuine or some inverse-kind shadow ones. I have started studying the documentation, the examples and old StackOverflow's questions, but some doubts remain.
When trying to make incremental my score calculator, I have found some unexpected methods in the IncrementalScoreCalculator interface. Together with beforeVariableChanged and afterVariableChanged, I find *EntityAdded and *EntityRemoved, which make me suspect that entity objects may be added and removed. Moreover, these methods are implemented in the NQueens documented example, but in the kind of examples I looking at, examples of distributing shifts, resources, time slots, etc., I find that the domain is designed in such a way that planning entities are expected to be modified, but not added or removed.
I don't know if the addition/removal of entity objects is something used somewhere, as in route planning problems which I haven't dove into, and if these additions and removals are explicit or implicit. So, might planning entities be added or removed by Optaplanner without being asked to?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-06 at 08:45No, OptaPlanner out-of-the-box will not add or remove planning entity instances, because the default move selectors only modify planning entities, they don't create or destroy them.
OptaPlanner doesn't have any generic move selectors yet that can do that (and once we do, they won't be on by default).
If you write a custom move (see MoveListFactory and MoveIteratorFactory in docs), then you could choose to add/remove entities in moves, which is why those methods exists, but very few users do that.
QUESTION
So I am solving the N queens problem, where you have to find the number of possible solutions to have a number N queens on an NxN chess board without them being able to attack each other. I am doing it using recursive backtracking. I have implemented my solution in code already, but for some reason I am not getting the correct number of solutions, and I can't figure out why.
Here is my code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-15 at 22:20Your problem is with the isSafe
function where you are not checking fully the diagonals:
QUESTION
I am quite new to tkinter(8.6) and have some experience in python(3.7.9).
I am making a program to solve the NQueens problem, the base code works and changes the values in the matrix, however when I try to configure the label when calling the method from the solver.py file, I get the error in the title. But if I call the method when testing the error does not appear.
Any ideas for a solution?
eightQueens.py
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-12 at 00:55Turns out the self.mainloop()
was in the incorrect place causing the GUI to create the board before any changes could be made, then calling the place
method after the GUI was destroyed, hence causing the error.
It was fixed by moving the self.mainloop()
to the solver.py file under calling
QUESTION
I have this error when executing my code. I looked around on other posts about this, but all these posts mention the use of ()
or []
where they should not be used. However, in my case I do not see that being the issue as the only thing I am trying to do is overwrite the value of an index of one list with another item of another list. This is the code I am trying to call it in:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-21 at 17:39childx = population[j].copy
childy = population[k].copy
QUESTION
I think I understand the point of the NQueens algorithm - you check each row for available spaces and if they exist, put a queen there, and recursively call the algorithm to the next row. Here is my algorithm (with N size 3)
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-13 at 23:00The problem is that when you remove a queen, you mark the corresponding squares as "free", i.e. setting their "threat count" to zero, regardless of whether another queen also threatens that square. Considering your example the following happens:
QUESTION
There are so many questions regarding Nqueens problem here. However, my implementation is different. My code checks with the board if queen placement is possible, instead of checking with the position of the previous queen.
It goes like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-08 at 05:50In your disable upper diagonal
loops, you have the condition wrong. Using an ||
operation, the looping continues when either condition is true, which will lead to out-of-bounds access to the array.
Change the conditions in both for loops to be &&
(and).
QUESTION
I am trying to implement a nqueens solver with OpenMP, my serial code works fine but when I try to do task parallelism on that, I get segmentation fault or empty rows/cols.
Here is my implementation:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-04 at 00:16There is a segmentation fault because you use private(col)
. Thus, col
is not copied from your function and not even initialized. Use firstprivate(col)
to make a proper copy of col
.
omp taskgroup
will make your code run in sequential since there is an implicit barrier at the end of the scope. It is probably better to avoid it (eg. by using an omp taskwait
at the end of the loop and changing a bit the rest of the code).
If you want to change that, please note that i
must be copied using a firstprivate
rather than shared
.
Moreover, avoid using global variables like SOLUTION_EXISTS
in a parallel code. This generally cause a lot of issues from vicious bugs to slow codes. And if you still need/want to do it, the variables used in multiple threads must be protected using for example omp atomic
or omp critical
directives.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install NQueens
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page