samples-server | MDN samples server ; used for samples that ca n't be | Learning library

by mdn JavaScript Version: Current License: CC0-1.0

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(4)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | samples-server Summary

samples-server is a JavaScript library typically used in Tutorial, Learning applications. samples-server has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. However samples-server has 9 bugs. You can download it from GitHub.

MDN samples server; used for samples that can't be hosted in-place on MDN, plus back-end server-side code for samples that need it.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

samples-server has a low active ecosystem.

It has 743 star(s) with 762 fork(s). There are 44 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 26 open issues and 10 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 98 days. There are 18 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of samples-server is current.

Quality

samples-server has 9 bugs (0 blocker, 0 critical, 7 major, 2 minor) and 10 code smells.

Security

samples-server has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

samples-server code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

samples-server is licensed under the CC0-1.0 License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

samples-server releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

samples-server saves you 186 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.

It has 458 lines of code, 3 functions and 23 files.

It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of samples-server

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

samples-server Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for samples-server.

samples-server Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for samples-server.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on samples-server

Modify MDN tutorial to make WebRTC one-to-many calls

Webrtc why is ontrack never called for the caller?

How to use .toJSON() on an ice candidate in webrtc is javascript?

"common name invalid" for a self-signed certificate for websocket server

QUESTION

Modify MDN tutorial to make WebRTC one-to-many calls

Asked 2020-Sep-03 at 19:32

It is August 2020 and I am new to WebRTC. I have followed the instructions found here and have successfully made both video and audio only calls with some additions to the code.

What I am having trouble about is modifying this code to make one-to-many or even many-to-many calls - video and audio only.

What I have started with so far is to replace [0] with [i]:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Sep-03 at 19:32

my solution to this problem was solved by scrapping the raw webRTC and using https://jitsi.org This software is private, customizable and reliable on my own server.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63252426

QUESTION

Webrtc why is ontrack never called for the caller?

Asked 2020-May-04 at 20:14

I'm using a modified version of this webrtc example.

UPDATE: This appears to actually be a bug in the code sample I'm using. If I set that up exactly, I still only get local video on the caller side. Any help to fix that would be much appreciated.

The only difference is the offer to the remote client is sent out a bit later. ie: "Let the person know I'm ready to meet, then send it"

The remote peer (the callee?) can see both streams perfect.

The local caller can only see themselves and ontrack is never called.

Both local and remote peer show stable connections and like I said, the remote peer works perfect.

Should sending ice candidates happen in both directions? because I feel like is. I'm new to webrtc, so that surprised me.

"$ ('#ReadyModalButton').click " is what sends the call offer.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-May-04 at 03:50

(I can't give the correct answer because I don't know the specs correctly) I also had this problem. The cause seems to be addTransceiver(). It is safe for OfferUser to addTransceiver(), but if AnswerUser adds track to peerConnection using addTransceiver() before setRemoteDescription(), it seems to be a transceiver unrelated to setRemoteDescription().

There are two possible solutions I can think of. 1. If AnswerUser uses peerConnection.addTrack() instead of addTransceiver() then it works. 2. After completing the negotiation once, get the transceiver with getTransceivers(), add the track and change the direction, and then perform the negotiation again.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61583959

QUESTION

How to use .toJSON() on an ice candidate in webrtc is javascript?

Asked 2020-May-03 at 17:08

In Javascript, I'm trying to send ice candidates via websockets (json).

I started out with this sample.

Before I use candidate.toJSON() and/or JSON.stringify() the candidate looks something like this:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-May-03 at 17:08

That is intentional, see the spec. The additional properties are encoded in the candidate string already, so if you do this on the remote end:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61577412

QUESTION

"common name invalid" for a self-signed certificate for websocket server

Asked 2019-Jan-11 at 08:53

I'm trying to run this webrtc client/signaling server code, but after running the server with a new self-signed certificate I created by following the instructions of this tutorial, my chatclient.js couldn't connect to socket server:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Jan-11 at 08:53

Set it to localhost which is the same host you're trying to connect to. You do not need to include the port. Note that you will need a certificate in production.

You might also want to check the highly useful Chrome flag which ignores certificate errors on localhost: chrome://flags/#allow-insecure-localhost

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54142899

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install samples-server

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: