web-client | Parsec client that runs in the browser | Browser Plugin library
kandi X-RAY | web-client Summary
kandi X-RAY | web-client Summary
Parsec client that runs in the browser
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of web-client
web-client Key Features
web-client Examples and Code Snippets
public String callBakeWithWebClient() {
WebClient webClient = WebClient.create();
try {
return webClient.get()
.uri("/api/bake/cookie?bakeTime=1000")
.retrieve()
.bodyToFlux(Strin
@Bean
public WebClient webClient(WebClient.Builder webClientBuilder) {
HttpClient httpClient = HttpClient.create()
.option(ChannelOption.CONNECT_TIMEOUT_MILLIS, 4_000)
.doOnConnected(connection ->
connection.addHandlerLas
@Bean
@Primary
WebClient webClientForAuthorized(ReactiveClientRegistrationRepository clientRegistrations, ServerOAuth2AuthorizedClientRepository authorizedClients) {
ServerOAuth2AuthorizedClientExchangeFilterFunction oauth = new Serve
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on web-client
QUESTION
I have created my authorization server using org.springframework.security:spring-security-oauth2-authorization-server:0.2.2
and my client using org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-oauth2-client
. The users are able to sign in and out successfully, however, while testing I noticed that if I log in successfully then restart the client (but not the server) without signing out and try to login in again the server throws the following error in an endless loop of redirects
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-05 at 14:37After trying out different solutions this was how I was able to solve it.
I changed my OAuth2AuthorizationService
bean to look like this.
QUESTION
I want to click on button using partial css path:
Full xpath:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-14 at 05:54The problem is that you've specified an XPath but used By.cssSelector()
.
Your second line should be
QUESTION
I'm very new and trying to set Firebase Google authentication in Expo RN app,
Expo docs code snippet below:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-07 at 08:24Replace the following code:
QUESTION
I was trying to simulate /protocol/openid-connect/token Keycloak end point using JMeter. Even though I have correlated code parameter and passing that properly. There is something called code_verifier and it is not found any of the previous requests. Providing the sample request and response for your reference. Can someone help me here if I have to take any additional steps to overcome this issue in the response attached.
Request:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-30 at 04:56This code_verifier
parameter needs to be generated, not correlated.
See the algorithm description in the RFC 7636
QUESTION
Imagine there is a Firestore database that is used by both 1 - a static front-end client and 2 - a node.js server.
Essentially, only a domain
and an ip address
are allowed to use that database, which works pretty well.
- we want to have the node.js server read/write on the entire database
- but the web-client should only be allowed to to read/write on the same database if a user is authenticated.
The issue is that with rules
it is not possible to whitelist our ip address
.
So we tried using this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-07 at 11:11May be I can explain this in two parts,
First, there is no need for someone to spoof some header and pretend to be your domain. The reason is if someone can login as an anonymous from your domain directly they can access all the information which you have allowed them to access
Second, and the most important one is, I think you have got the NodeJS server side access of firebase wrong. If you want to access the whole database from the node service use Firebase admin SDK and you don't have to do any kind of authentication to read to write when you connect from firebase admin SDK since you have admin access.
FYI Also you can whitelist your auth ip from the Authentication settings where you can allow whitelisted domains
QUESTION
I am trying a new Spring Authorization server 0.2.0. I have managed to successfully run a sample application located at https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-authorization-server/tree/main/samples/boot/oauth2-integration.
Now, I am trying to add custom UserDetailsService to the authorization server. I have created a custom UserDetailsService with users saved in the Mysql database.
I have replaced this
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-27 at 07:30First, cross-check that you've made relatable changes in the security config file.
QUESTION
I am writing a parser bot that checks a site for a domain name through the whois service. In the terminal the parsing goes fine and the information is displayed, but when need to send this text in the chat, an error is generated (send_message() missing 1 required positional argument: 'text')
this is just a link check:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-18 at 17:48I suppose you missed the chat_id parameter in the send_message function
Try adding a parameter:
QUESTION
I am trying to connect to Dynatrace through its API in Power BI. There is a lot of documentation within Dynatrace and Power BI sites, but it isn't clear which is better suited to handle Live data. This post seemed on the same topic but also didn't address the subject of live data. Is the Power BI application you use arbitrary in this case?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-16 at 13:29In short, PBI Desktop.
Power BI Web Client is primarily for sharing, accessing, and editing previous Charts, Dashboards, Etc. There are ways to connect using the Online version, but the tool is a little less clunky on the Desktop even though the Online version seems streamlined.
Power BI Desktop can push Dash's, Reports, and other visualized Data to the Web Client. Power BI Desktop is the best for in-house access to Dynatrace's API for a live feed of data.
QUESTION
navigating async, non blocking, and reactiveness is a handfull... given 2 non blocking, reactive, vert.x/quarkus based, micro services A and B, where the constraint is that A MUST communicate with B via http. in case I want to keep service A reactive (non blocking):
- should I use vertx-web-client? the docs state its an async client, but I assume that being vert.x based its non blocking as well? (i am distinguishing between async and non blocking here)
- in Quarkus, I see that a clone/sibling of the vertx-web-client, which is Mutiny specific, is used. Is this so that we can use Mutiny higher level APIs (like Uni/Multi). will I still get the same non blocking 'reactivity'?
- Java 11 has a new web client which is stated as async and reactive (I think reactive in the sense of supporting reactive streams. not sure if its the ame meaning). If I try to use this in my service A to communicate with B, will I still get the non blocking nature? or will it break it because its not vert.x based and not using netty for example? like I said I have my handsfull and my mind exploding :)
Any help would be great. thanks
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-31 at 10:21You can use the Vert.x Web Client which has an asynchronous and non-blocking API.
The Mutiny API for the Vert.x Web Client works with both Quarkus and Vert.x.
It works the same as the bare Vert.x Web Client, except the API is based on Uni
and Multi
.
I'm not very knowledgeable with the JDK11 HTTP Client. If your microservice A does nothing but sending HTTP requests to microservice B then perhaps using the JDK HTTP Client is just fine. But usually, a microservice also receives messages (HTTP, Kafka, ...etc) and interacts with a database. In this case it makes sense to leverage the integration of toolkit/framework.
QUESTION
I have met with a rather strange observation.
HTTP is a protocol used the most in this world. Don't know the stats, but surely it takes up at least 90% of the whole traffic on the internet.
Every major language has a library for creating a web-server and consuming traffic with a web-client. And practically every major language is a decendant of C and/or has C bindings.
But it seems like even though the both ends meet to naturally form the basis of the internet, there is no unified, widely used implementation of the HTTP parser in C.
There is http_parser by Ryan Dahl, there is its decendant llhttp by Fedor Indutny (both used in Node.js), and, I suppose, every framework implements its own parser for its needs.
Why, though?
I'm mostly worried about compatibility issues, about library support. For example, HTTP/3 rolls out and the library I used in my project doesn't support it, or Node.js is deprecated and no support again. Of course, the arguments sound silly, but look at it this way: why does everyone implement their own parser, if the HTTP protocol specification is clear AND at the end of the day practically every language out there has C bindings? Wouldn't it be better for everyone to agree on one code base and use it in every language? There is just nothing to compete about. It's a protocol, it is to be the same for everyone.
The question is that: Is there a cross-language solution, used by most of the servers, http clients? If there isn't, why?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-22 at 16:16Several reasons:
C is a product of the early 1970s, when systems tended to be monolithic and network-centric architectures were somewhat rare. It was created primarily to implement the Unix operating system. And it has precious little language-level support for much of anything - no native networking, graphics, sound, or much else. That’s why it’s as portable as it is - the language definition makes relatively few demands of the underlying platform. The group that maintains the C standard tends to be conservative about adding features.
HTTP is one protocol of many - telnet, SMTP, NNTP, FTP, SSH, etc., all of which are or have been as widely used as HTTP at some point. 30 years ago a good case could have been made for making telnet or FTP support native (which would have required a native TCP/IP stack as well). Now it’s HTTP and HTTPS, which would require a native SSL implementation.
Paradigms (and protocols) come and go, but legacy code is forever. Making protocols part of the language makes the language bigger and harder to maintain. New protocols get created, old protocols fall out of favor or are deprecated, leading to more maintenance issues. Each time a protocol is updated you’d need a compiler update (or at least a standard library update).
Life is just easier if all of that is kept separate from the language itself.
As for why there are so many different implementations...
Different platforms have different APIs - at some point you have to have a system-specific implementation;
Different people have different requirements for usability, capability, scalability, and security. A lightweight implementation that may work just fine for individual use may fall down under load;
Somebody may just not be aware of an existing implementation and rolls their own;
And, finally, there’s no referee; standards exist, and groups that maintain and enforce those standards exist, but there’s no one who officially blesses a particular implementation.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install web-client
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page