stackcopy | browser extension to copy code | Browser Plugin library
kandi X-RAY | stackcopy Summary
kandi X-RAY | stackcopy Summary
A browser extension to copy code-snippets from Stack Exchange sites . Copy code-snippets to your clipboard with ease from any Stack Exchange site. Chrome Extension and Firefox Add-on available.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of stackcopy
stackcopy Key Features
stackcopy Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on stackcopy
QUESTION
I'm watching lectures about Go. One about stack growing with this example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-25 at 06:23The difference is on using the builtin println()
function and the fmt.Println()
function from the standard lib.
println()
is a builtin function and the compiler knows println()
does not retain any arguments passed to it, so arguments passed to it does not escape to heap.
fmt.Prinln()
is from the standard lib and it is handled as any of your custom functions: the compiler makes no assumptions that it does not retain passed arguments, so arguments you pass to it may escape to heap, and so they are allocated on the heap and not on the stack.
This is an important difference. Next what causes the deviation is that Go has dynamic stack: it starts small, and if needed, it can grow. For details, see Does Go have an "infinite call stack" equivalent? Since you pass a considerably large argument to the recursive function stackCopy()
(array of size 1024, element type of int
which is 4 or 8 bytes), the initial small stack will be insufficient, and a larger stack will be allocated, causing stack-allocated variables to be moved, hence their address changing. This won't happen when fmt.Println()
is used, because the compiler deduces s
might escape, so it's allocated on the heap, and growing the stack does not results in moving s
.
You may use the -gcflags '-m'
flags to print the compiler's escape analysis.
In the first case:
QUESTION
I am struggling hard to understand and solve the "Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)" error valgrind points, so far with no success.
I tried initializing almost everything in my code (except for data element of the structure), even when it is obvious that it is not necessary. I tried debugging and checking that all members of every stack_t-object is initialized and has a value. All for no avail - valgrind keeps concluding that there is a memory error due to uninitialised value(s).
Funny thing is that all tests are flawless, except for the valgrind issue. I kept shrinking the scope of the code until I found the specific pieces of code that valgrind does not like.
Here it is below. This is from file stack.c:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-01 at 14:17Although reading uninitialized memory through char*
handle is not undefined behavior (and isn't via memcpy
and memcmp
functions), still it is considered good practice to always initialize memory before reading.
Valgrind properly diagnoses the "issue", you new_st = malloc(GET_STACK_SIZE(capacity, element_size));
allocate the memory and do not initialize the memory in the range ( offsetof(stack_t, _data), offsetof(stack_t, _data) + x * y ]
. Then the code reads from it in memcpy(new_st, other, GET_STACK_SIZE(other->_capacity, other->_element_size));
and compares it in memcmp(st1, st2,
- so valgrind shows uninitialized bytes errors.
The solve would be easy - initialize the memory. Either use calloc
or call memset
like memset(new_st.data, 0, x * y)
.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install stackcopy
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page