cringe | Orchestrate rolling deployments of Docker containers | Continuous Deployment library

Assume you have downloaded ml-100k.zip and store it somewhere.

For me the problem in your code is that your variable guild is not defined, so you have to use ctx.guild to get the good guild. Besides that, discord.Guild.me is not a function (callable with ()) but an attribute, you just have to use guild.me.

So you can try to make :

EDIT2: okay, so here is the github repo of the whole project. It is hosted (static so) on Netlify here: https://use-nuxt-fetch-hook-on-api.netlify.app/
It's totally SEO friendly since it's Nuxt doing it's SSR job upfront. Even tho, it is using fetch() hook, you can totally find, let's say "Clementina DuBuque" in the source code (ctrl + u) since it's generated at the buld time. You can also double-check this by disabling your Javascript on this specific page.

So, to sum up on your latest comment:

1. Because you are wrong about inferiority of asyncData since it is much better SEO oriented

The SEO is exactly the same here. No benefit on one or the other on the SSR part, while it's built.

1. It works and is not inferior and should not be claimed as inferior just because you think so or not comfortable with it.

I can repeat myself by pasting my own comment up here if you wish. Here, everything is explained properly:
"asyncdata is just inferior to fetch because it blocks the page and the user needs to wait in the middle of the process without any visual feedback nor a super great experience. you could use a skeleton (buefy.org/documentation/skeleton) and fetch, that way it will load the page, continue loading the data and display it like facebook, youtube and alike. you also do not have access to the handy helpers and you rely on your own logic: more code, more bugs possible. you also cannot use this in asyncData nor benefit from caching (timestamp helper)"

I recommended this since it does have those benefits, on top of how you do handle the data overall. I am comfortable with both of them. Just saying that in my opinion, fetch is better. Still, I provided an example with both implementations if you do not like mine. :D

1. Well my mistake was not it asyncData vs Fetch.

Your issue was with v-for and v-if too indeed. That's why I wrote you an example without this mistake. Sorry if I should have emphased it more.

That said, I don't know why you're so aggressive with the free help I do provide you. I do only try to help you. If you don't want to upvote, accept or whatever, you do you. No hard feelings here. Just sad that you do have that kind of attitude when somebody gives it's time to solve on of your issues.

That said, not even trying some of my solutions nor providing code relevant to the issue is not constructive. So yeah, I may avoid spending more time if you have those reactions, unfortunately.

EDIT: not the recommended way IMO but still, here is the asyncData variant for the same code: https://codesandbox.io/s/use-nuxt-async-data-hook-on-api-nisfj?file=/pages/index.vue

I've written an example for you here: https://codesandbox.io/s/use-nuxt-fetch-hook-on-api-5ymdz?file=/pages/index.vue

It shows you how to:

• use the fetch hook, not confuse with the fetch("https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/users") one !
• how to use the $fetchState.pending helper
• I've added a delay function just that you can see a bit better how it works
• properly set the props on the children

index.vue

Django admin is a basic CRUD system, it is not recommended to use in that way. Django views (your custom views) give you more power to control the process.

First of all, Django Permissions might be a good start point. Create Groups for user types and assign desired permissions for each group. Do not give permission for non-superusers to change group or permissions.

Second thing is using Django Signals to check data before saving it. For example, a pre_save signal for User creation can be used to check if is_superuser, is_staff values of the user are set by non-superuser. You can add added_by value to the user model and verify your checks using this value.

Also, using custom forms for Django admin is also possible and might be the simplest solution for it. Just make a custom form for creating and editing users and verify changes in the form directly before allowing the view to save anything. It is also possible to inform user that they don't have access for changes they made and also notify the management about the attempt.

• How can the bounds check be eliminated?

Arrays, via their deref-coercion to a slice, have an unchecked form of mutable get too.

Unless you declared guild as a global variable outside of the scope of client.on(...), it is indeed not defined. Probably what you want is member.guild.name and member.guild.memberCount

I am not 100% sure if I understood what you wanted to implement. However, The cause of the problem here might be from the complexity of how everything is in one place which leaves large room for mistakes. Please try to

1. Place all your CSS should be placed in the head section if you won't use an external file.
2. Place your JavaScript properly in the head/before end of the body tag based on what it does. if you won't use an external file.
3. You don't need to duplicate CSS more than once if the group of elements will share the same style. just use the same class across those elements.
4. The modal should be pushed down to the bottom of the page to make it easier for your to modify your HTML file.
5. In cases like this one you should use loops and arrays to minimize the repition of actions (I do understand that you are completely new to it, this is why I am trying to tell you what you can look up.)

I modified your code and applied some changes now all you need to do if you will add a new modal is add a new line to the Array with both the modal's id and its container's id.

Your full page code be found at the bottom of my answer, the following is a snippet for you to preview the code. if this not what you needed can you please explain further maybe I can help?

To prove that your solution is optimal if it is found, you merely have to prove that it finds the lexicographically last optimal solution.

And you do that by induction on the size of the lexicographically last optimal solution. The case of a zero length floor and no monitor is trivial. Otherwise you demonstrate that you found the first element of the lexicographically last solution. And covering the rest of the line with the remaining elements is your induction step.

Technical note, for this to work you have to be allowed to place monitoring stations outside of the line.

You can use Collection.has(), Collection.some(), or Collections.every()