kandi X-RAY | echo-chamber-js Summary
kandi X-RAY | echo-chamber-js Summary
Commenting without the comments
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Base - encode a string .
- Convert a string to word array
- Adds two 64 - bit numbers .
- Returns a function that invokes fn after wait milliseconds .
- Convert a number to a word
- Rotate an Array
- Creates a HH .
- Creates an IIIF .
- Goes up a G .
- Rotates the given value .
echo-chamber-js Key Features
echo-chamber-js Examples and Code Snippets
Trending Discussions on Blog
I am learning react js. I am a very beginner at this topic. But when I am doing setup to create a react environment I got an error. I have tried to solve the problem by Charles Stover blog in medium. But I got an error
Command "up" not found.
Here's my index.js file:...
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Sep-06 at 09:40
I got two different solution.
If i search the same question on the internet, then i'll get only links to vscode website ans some blogs which implements it.
I want to know that is
jsconfig.json is specific to
What will happen if we deploy the application on AWS / Heroku, etc. Do we have to make change?...
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Aug-06 at 04:10
This is definitely specific to VSCode.
Check more details here: https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/languages/jsconfig
You don't need this file when deploy it on AWS/Heroku, basically, you can exclude this from your commit if you are using git repo, i.e., add
jsconfig.json in your
.gitignore, this will make your project IDE independent.
I have been using github actions for quite sometime but today my deployments started failing. Below is the error from github action logs...
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Mar-16 at 07:01
First, this error message is indeed expected on Jan. 11th, 2022.
See "Improving Git protocol security on GitHub".
January 11, 2022 Final brownout.
This is the full brownout period where we’ll temporarily stop accepting the deprecated key and signature types, ciphers, and MACs, and the unencrypted Git protocol.
This will help clients discover any lingering use of older keys or old URLs.
For GitHub Actions:
There was a 4-month warning.
The entire Internet has been moving away from unauthenticated, unencrypted protocols for a decade, it's not like this is a huge surprise.
Personally, I consider it less an "issue" and more "detecting unmaintained dependencies".
Plus, this is still only the brownout period, so the protocol will only be disabled for a short period of time, allowing developers to discover the problem.
The permanent shutdown is not until March 15th.
As in actions/checkout issue 14, you can add as a first step:
I am getting this warning from github on my npm project build process... I tried searching on the internet and also read the blog link posted by github - but I could not find the solution to it anywhere. Am I missing something ?
npm notice Beginning October 4, 2021, all connections to the npm registry - including for package installation - must use TLS 1.2 or higher. You are currently using plaintext http to connect. Please visit the GitHub blog for more information: https://github.blog/2021-08-23-npm-registry-deprecating-tls-1-0-tls-1-1/
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Sep-10 at 15:18
Besides updating your version of node to an active or current LTS you want to ensure your NPM registry is set to an HTTPS endpoint:
The arithmetic mean of two unsigned integers is defined as:...
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Mar-08 at 10:54
The following method avoids overflow and should result in fairly efficient assembly (example) without depending on non-standard features:
Currently I'm using
"react": "17.0.2" and I have installed
"react-markdown": "^7.0.1" via
npm i react-markdown I'm using this package to display my rich text that I'm fetching from my Strapi CMS. I have used the following code to display the content:
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Sep-01 at 10:23
Node is currently treating your
.js file as CommonJS. You need to tell Node to treat it as an ES module.
"type": "module" in your
You can place it anywhere at the top level. E.g.:
I have Android Studio BumbleBee 2021.1.1 downloaded, running on a MacBook Pro M1. When downloading Android Studio, I chose the Apple Chip option (opposed to Intel)
I've created a Virtual Device - Android 12.0 arm64-v8a Pixel 4.
When I attempt to run the emulator it gets stuck here
Then, it times out:
I have searched SO and other blogs and can only find outdated material based on a time in 2020/2021 when Android did not support ARM64. However, it's my understanding that this has now changed so https://github.com/google/android-emulator-m1-preview is no longer needed.
What is the correct way to run the Android Emulator on a Mac with an M1 Chip?...
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Jan-28 at 19:17
I have found the issue so marking this as solved, however, if anyone knows why this solves the problem, please share!
I found an issue opened on Google's anroid-emulator-m1-preview repo with this answer https://github.com/google/android-emulator-m1-preview/issues/76#issuecomment-1023563846
Turns out, I just needed to uncheck 'Launch in a tool window' but again, not sure why that fixed the issue.
With regard to the Log4j JNDI remote code execution vulnerability that has been identified CVE-2021-44228 - (also see references) - I wondered if Log4j-v1.2 is also impacted, but the closest I got from source code review is the JMS-Appender.
The question is, while the posts on the Internet indicate that Log4j 1.2 is also vulnerable, I am not able to find the relevant source code for it.
Am I missing something that others have identified?
Log4j 1.2 appears to have a vulnerability in the socket-server class, but my understanding is that it needs to be enabled in the first place for it to be applicable and hence is not a passive threat unlike the JNDI-lookup vulnerability which the one identified appears to be.
Is my understanding - that Log4j v1.2 - is not vulnerable to the jndi-remote-code execution bug correct?References
Update #1 - A fork of the (now-retired) apache-log4j-1.2.x with patch fixes for few vulnerabilities identified in the older library is now available (from the original log4j author). The site is https://reload4j.qos.ch/. As of 21-Jan-2022 version 188.8.131.52 has been released. Vulnerabilities addressed to date include those pertaining to JMSAppender, SocketServer and Chainsaw vulnerabilities. Note that I am simply relaying this information. Have not verified the fixes from my end. Please refer the link for additional details....
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Jan-01 at 18:43
The JNDI feature was added into Log4j 2.0-beta9.
Log4j 1.x thus does not have the vulnerable code.
Recently, I was reading about the Ancient Babylonian Civilization that used a number system with base 60 instead of base 10. Even with this number system at base 60, they were still able to approximate the square root of 2 — and that too, thousands of years ago!
I was curious about this, and wanted to see how numbers from our decimal system (base 10) can be converted into the sexagesimal system (base 60). Using the R programming language, I found this link in which an answer is provided on converting numbers from some base to a different base.
However, it seems here that the base can only be between 2 and 36 (I want base 60):...
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Jan-30 at 20:41
The code as given almost works. The limitation to bases < 36 is only there because the original author wanted to express the values with the symbols [0-9A-Z]. Removing that limitation and extending the algorithm to allow extra digits 'after the decimal point' (or 'after the sexagesimal point' in the case of base 60 :-) ) we get something that almost works (function definition below):
I know Python
// rounds towards negative infinity and in C++
/ is truncating, rounding towards 0.
And here's what I know so far:...
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Jan-18 at 21:46
Although I can't provide a formal definition of why/how the rounding modes were chosen as they were, the citation about compatibility with the
% operator, which you have included, does make sense when you consider that
% is not quite the same thing in C++ and Python.
In C++, it is the remainder operator, whereas, in Python, it is the modulus operator – and, when the two operands have different signs, these aren't necessarily the same thing. There are some fine explanations of the difference between these operators in the answers to: What's the difference between “mod” and “remainder”?
Now, considering this difference, the rounding (truncation) modes for integer division have to be as they are in the two languages, to ensure that the relationship you quoted,
(m/n)*n + m%n == m, remains valid.
Here are two short programs that demonstrate this in action (please forgive my somewhat naïve Python code – I'm a beginner in that language):
No vulnerabilities reported
Reuse Trending Solutions
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page