GuzzleHttpMock | mock library for verifying requests | Mock library

 by   eschwartz PHP Version: v1.0.0 License: No License

kandi X-RAY | GuzzleHttpMock Summary

kandi X-RAY | GuzzleHttpMock Summary

GuzzleHttpMock is a PHP library typically used in Testing, Mock applications. GuzzleHttpMock has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

GuzzleHttpMock allows you to setup Http request expectations, and mock responses.

            kandi-support Support

              GuzzleHttpMock has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 10 star(s) with 5 fork(s). There are 1 watchers for this library.
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 0 open issues and 1 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 1 days. There are 1 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of GuzzleHttpMock is v1.0.0

            kandi-Quality Quality

              GuzzleHttpMock has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              GuzzleHttpMock has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              GuzzleHttpMock code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              GuzzleHttpMock does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              GuzzleHttpMock releases are available to install and integrate.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.
              It has 733 lines of code, 72 functions and 12 files.
              It has medium code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed GuzzleHttpMock and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into GuzzleHttpMock implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • Make a request against the expectations set .
            • Check the request body fields
            • Check array equality
            • Respond with content .
            • Throws an exception
            • Pretty print a value
            • Validate that a request can be made .
            • Encode array to json
            • Generate HTTP query .
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            GuzzleHttpMock Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for GuzzleHttpMock.

            GuzzleHttpMock Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for GuzzleHttpMock.

            Community Discussions


            Change behaviour of AutoFixture with AutoMoq to return false for methods
            Asked 2022-Mar-31 at 09:22

            Say that I have the following interface:



            Answered 2022-Mar-26 at 16:40

            First of all, you may want to use AutoMoqDataAttribute to create a mock of the ITeam interface:



            The unauthenticated git protocol on port 9418 is no longer supported
            Asked 2022-Mar-27 at 13:23

            I have been using github actions for quite sometime but today my deployments started failing. Below is the error from github action logs



            Answered 2022-Mar-16 at 07:01

            First, this error message is indeed expected on Jan. 11th, 2022.
            See "Improving Git protocol security on GitHub".

            January 11, 2022 Final brownout.

            This is the full brownout period where we’ll temporarily stop accepting the deprecated key and signature types, ciphers, and MACs, and the unencrypted Git protocol.
            This will help clients discover any lingering use of older keys or old URLs.

            Second, check your package.json dependencies for any git:// URL, as in this example, fixed in this PR.

            As noted by Jörg W Mittag:

            There was a 4-month warning.
            The entire Internet has been moving away from unauthenticated, unencrypted protocols for a decade, it's not like this is a huge surprise.

            Personally, I consider it less an "issue" and more "detecting unmaintained dependencies".

            Plus, this is still only the brownout period, so the protocol will only be disabled for a short period of time, allowing developers to discover the problem.

            The permanent shutdown is not until March 15th.

            For GitHub Actions:

            As in actions/checkout issue 14, you can add as a first step:



            Making a JSX syntax for a MockComponent and have it typed with typescript
            Asked 2022-Mar-20 at 22:37

            Wondering if anybody has some good suggestions on how to crack this. Got this test helper utils I have added some types to:



            Answered 2022-Mar-20 at 22:37

            If you look at React without JSX, you'll see that the XML-inspired syntax () is just short for React.createElement('MockComponent').

            Right now, if you renamed mockComponent to MockComponent and tried using the angle bracket syntax, the first issue is that your function receives two arguments. React components are either class components that take one constructor argument (props) or functional components that take one argument (again, props). The second issue is that your function returns a React functional component, when it needs to return a rendered React element.

            One way to fix this issue is to convert mockComponent into a React functional component and make module and propOverride props of the FC.



            Can not instantiate proxy of class: System.Net.HttpWebRequest. Could not find a parameterless constructor
            Asked 2022-Feb-23 at 12:05

            I am upgrading my C# function app from .net 3.1 to 6.0`.

            When I run my test cases, I found that, 1 of my test case failed with the below error.

            Castle.DynamicProxy.InvalidProxyConstructorArgumentsException : Can not instantiate proxy of class: System.Net.HttpWebRequest. Could not find a parameterless constructor.

            Basically, I am trying to mock HttpWebRequest and below is my piece of code for that.



            Answered 2022-Feb-23 at 10:53

            Both HttpWebRequest constructors are obsolete and should not be used. You have to use the static function "Create" to create a new instance of the HttpWebRequest class:

            HttpWebRequest myReq = (HttpWebRequest)WebRequest.Create("");

            To solve your issue, use the HttpClient class instead. This class has a parameterless constructor.



            Apache Beam Cloud Dataflow Streaming Stuck Side Input
            Asked 2022-Jan-12 at 13:12

            I'm currently building PoC Apache Beam pipeline in GCP Dataflow. In this case, I want to create streaming pipeline with main input from PubSub and side input from BigQuery and store processed data back to BigQuery.

            Side pipeline code



            Answered 2022-Jan-12 at 13:12

            Here you have a working example:



            How to compare file paths from JsonConfigurationSources and Directory.GetFiles properly?
            Asked 2021-Dec-20 at 04:22

            I created an extension method to add all JSON configuration files to the IConfigurationBuilder



            Answered 2021-Dec-19 at 09:24

            The logic of comparing files seems alright, I don't find any outstanding problem with it, it is ok to prepend the "/" to match what you need. Could be even better if you could use the System.IO.Path.DirectorySeparatorChar for the directory root path as well, so if you run on windows or Linux you will have no issues.

            But there may be a conceptual problem with what you are doing. To my understanding you aim to verify existence of specific configuration files required for your program to work right, if those files are missing than the program should fail. But that kind of failure due to missing configuration files, is an expected and valid result of your code. Yet, you unit-test this as if missing files should fail the test, as if missing files are an indication that something wrong with your code, this is wrong.

            Missing files are not indication of your code not working correct and Unit-test should not be used as a validator to make sure the files exist prior executing the program, you will likely agree that unit-test is not part of the actual process and it should only aim to test your code and not preconditions, the test should compare an expected result (mock result of your code) vs. actual result and certainly not meant to become part of the code. That unit test looks like a validator that should be in the code.

            So unless those files are produced by your specific code (and not the deployment) there is no sense testing that. In such case you need to create a configuration validator code - and your unit test could test that instead. So it will test that the validator expected result with a mock input you provide. But the thing here is that you would know that you only testing the validation logic and not the actual existence of the files.



            How to get preview in composable functions that depend on a view model?
            Asked 2021-Dec-16 at 21:53
            Problem description

            I would like to have the preview of my HomeScreen composable function in my HomeScreenPrevieiw preview function. However this is not being possible to do because I am getting the following error:



            Answered 2021-Sep-07 at 16:48

            This is exactly one of the reasons why the view model is passed with a default value. In the preview, you can pass a test object:



            v0.8 AggregatorV3Interface.sol , its available in @chainlink/contracts?
            Asked 2021-Nov-05 at 21:48

            I get a error when i change the version to 0.8 , but works fine with 0.6, how i see the most recent version? , i tried downloaded from npm install @chainlink/contracts --save, but only works with mock mode.

            This is my repo:

            Compiling contracts... Solc version: 0.8.9 Optimizer: Enabled Runs: 200 EVM Version: Istanbul CompilerError: solc returned the following errors:

            ParserError: Source "C:/Users/irwin/.brownie/packages/smartcontractkit/chainlink-brownie-contracts@1.1.1/contracts/src/v0.8/interfaces/AggregatorV3Interface.sol" not found: File not found. --> contracts/Lottery.sol:4:1: | 4 | import "@chainlink/contracts/src/v0.8/interfaces/AggregatorV3Interface.sol"; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

            ERROR: Unable to load project



            Answered 2021-Nov-05 at 21:48

            "As of 1.2.0 and onward all the releases of this package are going to match the @chainlink/contracts NPM tags So it will look backwards, but we are starting with 0.2.1"

            Change: @chainlink=smartcontractkit/chainlink-brownie-contracts@1.1.1 To: @chainlink=smartcontractkit/chainlink-brownie-contracts@0.2.1




            Not able to mock a function inside useEffect
            Asked 2021-Oct-13 at 08:26

            I have a custom hook as below



            Answered 2021-Oct-13 at 05:27

            Because it's a named export you should return an object in the mock



            pytest/unittest: mock.patch function from module?
            Asked 2021-Sep-22 at 07:06

            Given a folder structure like such:



            Answered 2021-Sep-22 at 07:06

            Yeah. I also fought with this initially when I learned patching and mocking and know how frustrating it is as you seem to be doing everything right, but it does not work. I sympathise with you!

            This is actually how mocking of imported stuff works, and once you realise it, it actually makes sense.

            The problem is that import works in the way that it makes the imported module available in the context of where your import is.

            Lets' assume your module is in 'my_package' folder. Your code is available then as my_package.code. And once you use from dag_common.connections import get_conn in code module - the imported get_conn becomes available as .... my_package.code.get_conn

            And in this case you need to patch my_package.code.get_conn not the original package you imported get_conn from.

            Once you realise this, patching becomes much easier.


            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network


            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install GuzzleHttpMock

            You can download it from GitHub.
            PHP requires the Visual C runtime (CRT). The Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable for Visual Studio 2019 is suitable for all these PHP versions, see You MUST download the x86 CRT for PHP x86 builds and the x64 CRT for PHP x64 builds. The CRT installer supports the /quiet and /norestart command-line switches, so you can also script it.


            For that warm fuzzy open-sourcey feeling, contribute to GuzzleHttpMock today!. We only ask that you include PHPUnit tests, and update documentation as needed. Also, if it's not an open issue or on our wish list, you might want to open an issue first, to make sure you're headed in the right direction. Take a look at the "Gotchyas" section for some things that could be fixed. Have another idea? Open an issue, and we'll talk.
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
          • HTTPS


          • CLI

            gh repo clone eschwartz/GuzzleHttpMock

          • sshUrl


          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link