web-frameworks | Which is the fastest web framework | HTTP library

by the-benchmarker PHP Version: 2018.9.26 License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(6)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | web-frameworks Summary

web-frameworks is a PHP library typically used in Networking, HTTP, Framework applications. web-frameworks has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub.

Which is the fastest web framework?

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

web-frameworks has a medium active ecosystem.

It has 6676 star(s) with 603 fork(s). There are 152 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 183 open issues and 905 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 152 days. There are 9 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of web-frameworks is 2018.9.26

Quality

web-frameworks has 0 bugs and 9 code smells.

Security

web-frameworks has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

web-frameworks code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 2 security hotspots that need review.

License

web-frameworks is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

web-frameworks releases are available to install and integrate.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

web-frameworks saves you 669 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.

It has 1551 lines of code, 97 functions and 115 files.

It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed web-frameworks and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into web-frameworks implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

Decrypts a message
Parse url patterns
Parse database configuration .
Handle the request
Guess the extension from a media type .
Get path to template file .
Parse parameters .
Handle exception .
Start a new logger .
Finds a resource .

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

web-frameworks Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for web-frameworks.

web-frameworks Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for web-frameworks.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on web-frameworks

How do you configure a Google Domain with Digital Ocean?

Failed to start nanoexpress server

I'm lost. What happened to ASP.NET MVC 5?

Refactoring a Controller in symfony to adapt to hexagonal architecture

Create method like System.Web.Helpers.Crypto.HashPassword (ASP.NET) in nodejs?

Which Material Design framework can I use for supporting Nested Tabs in my website?

QUESTION

How do you configure a Google Domain with Digital Ocean?

Asked 2020-Nov-26 at 20:57

For context, I'm working through the Obey the Testing Goat book for Test-Driven Development with Python/Django and am on chapter 9. I purchased a domain from Google, specified the three customer name servers for Digital Ocean on Google Domains, created a Digital Ocean droplet, set up DNS A-records that point to my subdomains on my site, and uploaded my repository server-side. However, when I try to curl the website address development server via Git Bash from my local machine, I get the error:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Nov-26 at 20:57

It seems like your local DNS server (maybe the one of your internet providers) has cached the (no)-reply for your domain/subdomain. Try to wait some time (normally up to 24h) and try again.

If you would like to test this you could try on Linux (I don't know how it's working on Windows):

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65028679

QUESTION

Failed to start nanoexpress server

Asked 2020-Mar-16 at 22:28

I want to rewrite my AWS Lambda functions to a standalone machine. While I was reading about NodeJS Express I found new library called nanoexpress which excels in performance. I downloaded an example code and saved it locally.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Mar-16 at 22:28

You can try use CommonJS variant like this

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60697934

QUESTION

I'm lost. What happened to ASP.NET MVC 5?

Asked 2020-Jan-31 at 14:40

I've been keeping my head down working on various projects and apparently Microsoft has been busy making some big changes and it's confusing the hell out of me. ASP.NET Core first came onto my radar when I installed Visual Studio 2017 last year and went to create a new project and suddenly had choices of .NET Framework, .NET Standard, and .NET Core. So I looked into them a little and saw that the latter two are, in some way, abbreviated versions of the full framework. I read this post by Scott Hanselman ASP.NET 5 is dead - Introducing ASP.NET Core 1.0 and .NET Core 1.0 I also found this, which steered me away from ASP.NET Core: Choose between ASP.NET and ASP.NET Core. My takeaway was "Core is new, you're fine to keep using the full framework." So I created a new ASP.NET MVC site using .NET Framework 4.6.2 and Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc 5.2.3.

Since creating that project, I found what seemed like some bugs in both MVC and Entity Framework only to find that the only mention of them on the web seems to be in Core and that's the only place they're being considered being fixed.

Now, today, I'm trying to look up the documentation on System.Web.Mvc.Controller and System.Web.Mvc.JsonResult and it's gone except under Core documentation. I did finally dig it up here where it says it's no longer being maintained?

I understood this much about Core and said, "ok, why should I care? I'm going to keep doing what I'm doing and check back on that when it's done." But now it seems that 4.6.2 is not even supported anymore. Can someone explain what's going on? Is my NET 4.6.2/MVC 5.2.3 project now obsolete before I'm even finished writing it? If not, why has the documentation been retired and hidden away? I'm worried some of my dependencies might not even be available for or compatible with Core.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Jan-31 at 14:40

(This answer is regularly updated whenever a new .NET announcement is made, and it has been updated with details of ASP.NET Core 3.0, .NET 3, and .NET 5)

Microsoft needs a good slapping for the amount of confusion over the past 3 years over .NET Core / DNX, ASP.NET Core, .NET Standard, .NET 5 and the rest.

(and I'm saying that as a former FTE SE in DevDiv... _{("hi from building 16!")})

ASP.NET aka "System.Web" is now dead. WebForms is dead (hurrah!)
ASP.NET MVC launched in 2008 was built on-top of ASP.NET, but bypassed most of the WebForms infrastructure.
- ASP.NET MVC has its own versioning separate from ASP.NET and ASP.NET Web API (and ASP.NET Core). You linked to ASP.NET MVC 5's documentation - this is not the same thing as ASP.NET 5.
ASP.NET Web API launched in 2012 is a sibling of ASP.NET MVC, in that it built on-top of ASP.NET too, but had its own class library (System.Web.Http) that didn't share much with ASP.NET MVC (System.Web.Mvc). Attempting to combine an ASP.NET Web API service with an ASP.NET MVC web-application in the same project is an exercise in pain.
ASP.NET MVC 5 was launched in 2014 as an update to ASP.NET MVC 4. It is unrelated to ASP.NET 5.
ASP.NET MVC 6 was never released. It was rolled-into ASP.NET 5 which then became ASP.NET Core. Its goal was to combine ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Web API into a single platform.
ASP.NET Core was launched in 2016 as an improved design of ASP.NET MVC 5 but without the dependencies on System.Web.dll or any (now-legacy) IIS dependencies (e.g. the old request pipeline, IHttpHandler and IHttpModule no longer exist).
- Note that ASP.NET Core's class library's root namespace is now Microsoft.AspNet and not System.Web. This was a source of confusion for me. This means that upgrading projects from ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET WebAPI to ASP.NET Core are non-trivial, despite their fundamental architecture of Controllers and Middleware being the same.
.NET Core is a new version of the CLR and BCL which is explicitly portable and runs on Windows, Linux and macOS.
- .NET Core 1.0 and .NET Core 2.0's base class libraries were considered anemic compared to the full-fat .NET Framework which is a Windows-exclusive.
- With .NET Core 3.0 and the open-sourcing of WinForms, WPF and other components of .NET Framework, .NET Core is now primed as a replacement for .NET Framework in Windows for new application development.
.NET 5 will be the new name of .NET Core after .NET Core 3 is released (.NET 5 is expected around late 2020).
- .NET 5 has absolutely nothing to do with ASP.NET 5.0 nor ASP.NET MVC 5.
- There is no .NET Core 4 nor .NET Framework 5.0.

I note that "Core" is Microsoft's hot branding for the current generation of .NET platforms which work with .NET Core (i.e. they have no Windows dependencies and so are portable). (Just like how Microsoft stuck "Active" onto things in the 1990s if they used COM or ActiveX, e.g. Active Desktop, Active Channels, ActiMates, Active Directory, ActiveSync, etc). - _{Additionally Entity Framework Core is still lacking a lot of functionality from Entity Framework 6, this is because it's a rewrite, basically - but it will reach parity eventually.}

Because there are many .NET runtimes and BCLs currently available (.NET Framework, .NET Core, UWP, Xamarin (which uses Mono), Unity and others) Microsoft introduced .NET Standard which is basically a reboot of the Portable Class Library concept: where Visual Studio projects target a known subset of common functionality instead of a specific implementation. _{(I just wish they'd start the version numbering from 4 to match .NET Framework instead of starting at 1.0 because that got me thinking about 2001 all over again.)} - but the important part is that ASP.NET Core 1 and ASP.NET Core 2 target .NET Standard instead of .NET Core - which means that ASP.NET Core runs on top of the .NET Framework on Windows in addition to running on top of .NET Core as well.

_{I note that all previous .NET cross-platform compatibility techniques are now obsolete (including targeting Compact Framework subsets, Portable Class Libraries, and even "Shared Projects" in Visual Studio), as they were meant for other editions of .NET which no-longer exist, such as .NET Compact Framework, XNA, Silverlight, and Windows Phone 7's subset.}

In May 2019, Microsoft announced ".NET 5". In short, the .NET Framework is being replaced with .NET Core (specifically: the next version of .NET Core after .NET Core 3.0 will be named .NET 5). This announcement does not concern ASP.NET Core at all, other than the fact that .NET 5 will fully support ASP.NET Core 3.0 applications running on it. _{(ASP.NET Core 4 will probably be released by then anyway)}

In summary:

ASP.NET MVC 5 was a short-lived successor to ASP.NET MVC 4, released alongside ASP.NET Web API 2. It actually ran on top of ASP.NET 4 (i.e. .NET 4.x version of System.Web.dll). The platform ASP.NET MVC is now obsolete.
ASP.NET 5 was EOL'd and rebranded as ASP.NET Core and it includes the functionality of "ASP.NET MVC 5" built-in.
ASP.NET Core 1 and ASP.NET Core 2 can run on either .NET Core (cross-platform) or .NET Framework (Windows) because it targets .NET Standard.
ASP.NET Core 3 now only runs on .NET Core 3.0.

All of them (in chronological order):

ASP.NET 1 - 2001. Included WebForms. Ran on .NET Framework 1.0 and 1.1. System.Web.dll.
ASP.NET 2.0 - 2005. Included WebForms. Ran on .NET Framework 2.0. System.Web.dll.
ASP.NET MVC 1 and ASP.NET MVC 2 - 2008-2009. Ran on top of ASP.NET 2.0. System.Web.Mvc.dll.
ASP.NET 4.0 - 2010. Included WebForms. Ran on .NET Framework 4.0. There was no ASP.NET 3.0. System.Web.dll.
ASP.NET MVC 3 and ASP.NET MVC 4 - 2010-2013. Ran on top of ASP.NET 4.0. System.Web.Mvc.dll.
ASP.NET Web Api 1 - 2012. Ran on top of ASP.NET 4.0. System.Web.Http.dll.
ASP.NET MVC 5 - 2013. Just another update to ASP.NET MVC. Ran on top of ASP.NET 4.0 but could also run independently without System.Web.dll under OWIN.
ASP.NET Web API 2 - 2013. Sibling to ASP.NET MVC 5. Could also run without ASP.NET 4.0 under OWIN.
ASP.NET MVC 6 - 2014-2015. Aborted after reaching Release Candidate status and rebooted as ASP.NET Core MVC 1.0 in 2016 which is the MVC and Web API component of ASP.NET Core 1.
ASP.NET 5 - 2014. Major reboot of ASP.NET described here. The main changes included merging MVC, Web Pages and Web API - and the removal of WebForms. ASP.NET 5 reached Release Candidate status but was then rebranded as ASP.NET Core. There has never been an ASP.NET 6.
ASP.NET Core 1 - 2016. Runs on either .NET Framework 4.5 or .NET Core 1.0.
.NET Core - 2016. Portable and minimal .NET runtime and class library.
.NET Standard - 2017. A way for programs to target a common set of functionality that will be present in all .NET implementations (.NET Framework 4.5 and later, .NET Core 2.0 and later, Xamarin, etc).
ASP.NET Core 2 - 2017-2018: where we are today. Runs on either .NET Framework 4.6.1 or .NET Core 2.0. (As of late 2018 there is now ASP.NET Core 2.1).
ASP.NET Core 3 - In late October 2018 Microsoft announced ASP.NET Core 3.0 will now only run on the upcoming .NET Core 3.0 (so it will no-longer run on the .NET Framework 4.7.x). This is a controversial move because it means there is now no upgrade path from ASP.NET Core 2.x to ASP.NET Core 3.x for applications that run on the .NET Framework 4.7.x because of dependencies that don't support .NET Core yet, which means there likely won't be a .NET Standard 3.0.
ASP.NET Core 3.0 on .NET 5 - In the May 2019 announcement of .NET 5, Microsoft stated that ASP.NET Core 3.0 applications will run on .NET 5. It is currently unclear if ASP.NET Core 2.x applications will be able to run unmodified on .NET 5.

Timeline and block diagram

(I got carried away making this...)

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51390971

QUESTION

Refactoring a Controller in symfony to adapt to hexagonal architecture

Asked 2018-Sep-09 at 17:07

I have create a controller that creates a Owner record into database. Everything was done on the CreateOwnerController like this and working properly:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Sep-09 at 17:07

This answer is for Symfony 3.3+/4+.

You need to register your repository as a service. Instead of extending it 3rd party code, you should use composition over inheritance.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42608600

QUESTION

Create method like System.Web.Helpers.Crypto.HashPassword (ASP.NET) in nodejs?

Asked 2018-Jul-15 at 14:45

How can I make password hash using RFC 2898 like https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/aspnet/web-frameworks/gg538287(v=vs.111) in nodejs?

My nodejs app are using a table of SQL server which have password field hashed by Crypto.HashPassword of ASP.NET, so I need create same function in nodejs to compare it.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Jul-15 at 14:45

const crypto = require('crypto');
const hexChar = ['0', '1', '2', '3', '4', '5', '6', '7', '8', '9', 'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F'];
const verifyHashedPassword = (password, hashedPwd) => {
  let saltString = '';
  let storedSubKeyString = '';
  const hashedPasswordBytes = new Buffer(hashedPwd, 'base64');
  for (var i = 1; i < hashedPasswordBytes.length; i++) {
    if (i > 0 && i <= 16) {
      saltString += hexChar[(hashedPasswordBytes[i] >> 4) & 0x0f] + hexChar[hashedPasswordBytes[i] & 0x0f];
    }
    if (i > 0 && i > 16) {
      storedSubKeyString += hexChar[(hashedPasswordBytes[i] >> 4) & 0x0f] + hexChar[hashedPasswordBytes[i] & 0x0f];
    }
  }
  const nodeCrypto = crypto.pbkdf2Sync(new Buffer(password), new Buffer(saltString, 'hex'), 1000, 256, 'sha1');
  const derivedKeyOctets = nodeCrypto.toString('hex').toUpperCase();
  return derivedKeyOctets.indexOf(storedSubKeyString) === 0;
};

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51338305

QUESTION

Which Material Design framework can I use for supporting Nested Tabs in my website?

Asked 2017-Apr-07 at 01:29

I am building a web page which is going to have Nested Tabs. And I want it to have Material Design. I had been using Material Design Lite but based on my experience, as well as this, this and this link, I don't think that Material Design Lite supports or is going to support Nested tabs.

So which material design framework should I use to support Nested Tabs in my web page?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Apr-07 at 01:29

I use MaterializeCSS. Although it is still in beta, Materialize has a good set of components and it is updated quite often. Here is an example of simple nested tabs.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43178890

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install web-frameworks

You can download it from GitHub.
PHP requires the Visual C runtime (CRT). The Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable for Visual Studio 2019 is suitable for all these PHP versions, see visualstudio.microsoft.com. You MUST download the x86 CRT for PHP x86 builds and the x64 CRT for PHP x64 builds. The CRT installer supports the /quiet and /norestart command-line switches, so you can also script it.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: