darc | Darkweb Crawler Project | Crawler library

The error message arises because you set panel.spacing = element_blank(). panel.spacinghas to be a unit object, hence use panel.spacing = unit(0, "pt") to remove the spacing between panels.

However, even with this change facetting will not work but throws an error

Error in gList(list(name = "background.1-11-18-1", gp = NULL, vp = NULL, : only 'grobs' allowed in "gList"

Unfortunatly I can't tell you what's the problem with this issue here.

Nonetheless I have two solution approaches to solve this issue:

1. Add your dataset as an argument to your custom function and make it the global dataset by putting it in your call to ggplot(), e.g. try ggplot(data = shots_df).

2. My preferred option would be to drop the call to ggplot() in the custom function and put all the layers in a list. Try this:

You are not passing an associative array where the keys are what you want the variables to be named in the view:

I have not used darcs and could be off base here, but scanning through the Wikipedia article, I observe that its claim here is misleading:

Patch commutation is used in Darcs to merge changes, and is also implemented in git (but called "rebasing"). Patch commutation merge means changing the order of patches (i.e. descriptions of changes) so that they form a linear history. In effect, when two patches are made in the context of a common situation, upon merging, one of them is rewritten so that it appears to be done in the context of the other.

Git neither stores patches, nor reorders them.¹ You can reorder patches manually if you like. When you use git rebase to convert commits—which are snapshots—into changesets, the conversion itself is done in a simple manner that is worst-case O(nd) where n is the number of lines and d is the length of the edit script. (Whether this is handled as a patch or as a cherry-pick, which is a merge, depends on which rebase algorithm you choose; the merge case tends to use more CPU time as it also looks for treewide rename operations.)

Hence, if you have C total commits, the worst case for a git rebase -i is roughly O(Cnd).² Git is not going to try any other order for the commits: it's up to you to do any reordering. If your rebase fails, you could try all possible reorderings, which would be a factorial function on the number of commits, but Git won't do that for you.

¹If you do a git rebase on a group of commits that has one or more merges inside itself, Git does "flatten" them and eliminate the merges—but it doesn't try many orders, it just does one topological walk of the whole thing. There is no attempt to be smart about it, and often this will lead to terrible merge conflicts, i.e., it's often a bad idea. If you use the new --rebase-merges flag, Git will try to keep the merges, but does so by re-performing them. It just builds an identical topology, using a mini scripting language, and then lets you edit it manually if you like.

²If rename-detection gets involved, that is O(n²) in the number of files that could be rename-detected. Git tries to limit this in several ways, including having a maximum length for the rename queue, with the current default being 4000 files.

To fix this issue, you'll need to do opam init --comp 1.2.2 to ensure ocaml is installed properly and set as the version you want.

Maybe this solution works for you:

You can match name and the sub string of address before @ of email table

darcs whatsnew -ls should work I think

Pattern match on the option.

The form of this for loop is to always increment the counter variable after the final statement or function has executed or returned, respectively. So, any incrementation of 'i' in the loop body, in this case, will add 1 to the value of the for loop counter, corrupting the count.