n_queens | Solving N-Queens problem by DFS & BFS in Python | Learning library
kandi X-RAY | n_queens Summary
kandi X-RAY | n_queens Summary
Solving N-Queens problem by DFS & BFS in Python.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Solve the BFS problem
- Check if two kings are conflict
- Solve the problem
- Prints a list of queens
n_queens Key Features
n_queens Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on n_queens
QUESTION
I've been practicing the standard recusion and backtracking examples online, and came across the N-queens problem (in the LeetCode setting). After a lot of tinkering, I managed to apply a recursion in order to retrieve ANY, not all, solutions for a given board size n.
However, my algorithm works up to n=8, printing out valid board configurations, but invalid ones when n=9 or equal to the few higher numbers I tried. Invalid meaning that some board rows are full of dots and not populated by a "Q" queen, but the backtracking fails to catch that, possibly due to a buggy recursion.
For example, for n=9, this is the output:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-10 at 22:04Ok, forget my comments. I thought the diagonal test was wrong, I just thought you applied a different idea wrongly, but the idea you applied was correct.
Your actual problem is that you are not backtracking correctly: You just try the first position for each Queen, and only retry placing the first one. backtrack
needs to actually backtrack, e.g. erase it's changes:
QUESTION
I have been playing around with a simple n-queens model in MiniZinc:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-28 at 01:41Those values depend of the search strategy, some times you cannot avoid a leaf node because it hasn't been pruned, that means, nothing before it told the solver that that node was going to be a failure, modeling it in a different way can prevent some failures, and can also prevent suboptimal solutions in the case of optimization problems.
These are the first three nodes that got evaluated on the search tree of the default search strategy of minizinc, I labeled them in the image of the Search Tree in the order they got evaluated, and the 4 and 5 to show the arrival to a feasible solution.
In the the blue dots are nodes where there is still uncertainty, the red squares are failures, white dots are non evaluated nodes, large triangles are whole branches where the search only resulted in failures, the green diamond means a feasible solution, and orange diamonds mean non-best-but-feasible solution (only in optimization problems).
The explanation of each of the labeled nodes is
0: Root node: all variables are un assignedNothing has happened, these are all the decision variables and their full domains
queens = array1d(1..8, [[1..8], [1..8], [1..8], [1..8], [1..8], [1..8], [1..8], [1..8]]);
Then it picked the smallest value in the domain of the last variable and made the first split, the solver thought either queens[8] = 1
(left child of the root) or queens[8] = [2..8]
(right child of the root), it will first evaluate queens[8] = 1
and that bring the first node to existence,
queens = array1d(1..8, [[2..7], {2..6,8}, {2..5,7..8}, {2..4,6..8}, {2..3,5..8}, {2,4..8}, [3..8], 1]);
where the decision queens[8] = 1
already propagated to the other variables and removed values from its domains.
Then it again splits at queens[7]
, this is the left child node where queens[7] = 3
, the minimum value in the domain of that variable, and the propagation of that decision to the other variables.
queens = array1d(1..8, [{2,4..7}, {2,4..6}, {2,4..5,8}, {2,4,7..8}, {2,6..8}, [5..8], 3, 1]);
In hindsight (more like cheating by looking at the image of the Search Tree) we know that this whole branch of the search will result in failures, but we cannot know that while searching, because there is still uncertainty in some variables, to know that we would have to evaluate all of the possibilities, which are possibly feasible, that might happen or not, hopefully we will find a satisfying solution before that, but before carry on with the search, notice that already some some pruning got done in the form of nodes that won't exist, for example queens[4]
can only take the values 2,4,7,8
at this point, and we haven't made any decision on it, its just the solver eliminating values from the variable that it knows will certainly result in failures, if we where making a brute force search this variable would have the same domain as in the root node [1..8]
because we haven't made a decision on it yet, so we are making a smarter search by propagating the constraints.
Carrying on with the same strategy it makes a split for queens[6]
, this time the minimum value queens[6] = 5
, when propagating to the undecided variables, but there is no solution that satisfies all the constraints (here it gave the value 8 to two queens), so this is a dead end and must backtrack.
queens = array1d(1..8, [7, 2, 4, 8, 8, 5, 3, 1]);
---> Failure
So the very first three nodes of the search lead to a failure.
The search continues like that, since the choice for queens[6] = 5
caused a failure it goes to the next value queens[6] = [6..8]
, that search also results in the failures that are encircled in red in the image of the Search Tree.
As you can probably guess by now the search strategy is something like go in the order of the variables
and split the domain of the variables by picking the smallest value available and put the rest of the domain in another node
, this in minizinc search annotations are called input_order
and indomain_min
.
Now we fast forward the search to the node labeled 4.
4: Prelude to a solution: are we there yet?Here you can see that queens[8] = 1
(remains the same), queens[7] = 5
while in the node 2 it was queens[7] = 3
, that means that all the possibilities where queens[8] = 1
and queens[7] = [3..4]
where either evaluated or pruned, but all lead to failures.
queens = array1d(1..8, [{2,4,6..7}, {2..3,6}, {2..4,7}, {3..4,7}, {2,6}, 8, 5, 1]);
Then this node spited into queens[6] = 2
(left child) which lead to more failures and queens[6] = 6
(right child)
queens[2] = 6
propagated, and the result satisfied all the constraints, so we have a solution and we stop the search.
queens = array1d(1..8, [4, 2, 7, 3, 6, 8, 5, 1]);
Arriving to the solution only required 47 nodes of the gigantic Whole Search Tree, the area inside the blue line is the search tree is the Search Tree where nodes labeled 0,1,2,3,4,5 are, it is gigantic even pruned for this relatively small instance of 8 decision variables of cardinality 8 with a global constraint which certainly reduces the span of the search tree by a lot since it communicates the domains of the variables between each other much more effectively than the constraint store of the solver. The whole search tree only has 723 nodes in total (nodes and leafs) where only 362 are leafs, while the brute force search could generate all the possible 8^8 leaf nodes directly (again, it might not, but it could), thats a search space of 16.777.216 possibilities (its like 8 octal digits since its 8 variables with cardinality of domain 8), it is a big saving when you compare it, of the 16.777.216 to the solver only 362 made some sense, and 92 where feasible, its less than 0.0001% of the combinations of the whole search space you would face by, for example, generating at random a solution by generating 8 random digits in the range [1..8] and evaluating its feasibility afterwards, talk about a needle in a haystack.
Pruning basically means to reduce the search space, anything better than the evaluation of ALL the combinations, even by removing one single possibility is considered a pruned search space. Since this was a satisfaction problem rather than an optimization one, the pruning is just to remove unfeasible values from the domain of the variables.
In the optimization problems there are two types of pruning, the satisfaction pruning like before, eliminating imposible solutions, and the pruning done by the bounds of the objective function, when the bounds of the objective function can be determined before all the variables reached a value and be it is determined to be "worst" than the current "best" value found so far (i.e. in a minimization optimization the smallest value the objective could take in a branch is larger than the smallest value found so far in a feasible solution) you can prune that branch, which surely contains feasible (but not as good) solutions as well as unfeasible solutions, and save some work, also you still have to prune or evaluate all the tree if you want to find the optimal solution and prove that it is optimal.
To explore search trees like the ones of the images you can run your code with the gecode-gist
solver in the minizinc IDE, or use minizinc --Solver gecode-gist
in the command line, upon double clicking on one of the nodes you will see the state of the decision variables just like the ones in this post.
And even further use solve :: int_search( pos, varChoise, valChoise, complete) satisfy;
to test this different search strategies
QUESTION
I recently discovered the guard
function associated with the Control.Monad
module (defined here) and it seemed to be a perfect function to solve a common programming challenge: the eight queens problem. I came up with this solution:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-12 at 11:22You can recurse while keeping around the list of already-placed queens:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install n_queens
You can use n_queens like any standard Python library. You will need to make sure that you have a development environment consisting of a Python distribution including header files, a compiler, pip, and git installed. Make sure that your pip, setuptools, and wheel are up to date. When using pip it is generally recommended to install packages in a virtual environment to avoid changes to the system.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page