pretend | A library for stubbing in python | Mock library

I'm using Laravel 7.3 and need to update to 8 because of plugins needings

I'm reading the documentation but as I'm a noob as in English like in computing I have some errors and problems

First of all, I followed this :

Update the following dependencies in your composer.json file:

I have a dataset containing results from a survey. Let's pretend that a survey was sent out to thousands of employees belonging to a number of different companies, I processed the results of these surveys, identified some errors in those surveys and now want to send a custom error summary to each employee, so that they can correct those errors.

To send out these summaries, we use a software which allows you to send out a custom email, using a template where you can specify custom fields.

E.g.

Dear (Name),

We have identified a total of (number of errors) errors in the the surveys submitted by (company_name). Please find these below:

(error_1_description)

(error_1_survey_IDs)

(error_2_description)

(error_2_survey_IDs)

(error_3_description)

(error_3_survey_IDs)

(error_4_description)

(error_4_survey_IDs)

When sent, the recipient sees a summary specific to their company, e.g. :

Dear Steve,

We have identified a total of 20 errors in the the surveys submitted by Amazon. Please find these below:

Error in question 1. IDs of affected surveys:

00100A, 00100B, 00100C

Error in question 2. IDs of affected surveys:

00100A, 00100B

Error in question 3. IDs of affected surveys:

00100A

Error in question 4. IDs of affected surveys:

00100B, 00100C

My problem is that I need to re-structure the error summary into the template format accepted by the software, and I am struggling to find a way.

The table containing the error summary can be re-created using the code below:

I need to fill a lot of very large arrays by opening up thousands of csv files, extracting columns of data, and inserting them into 3D and 4D matrices. I've tried writing this in parallel, but what always happens is that my computer crashes when my memory fills up. I've looked at this question, Parallel `for` loop with an array as output, but I have not gotten those suggestions to work for me. Here's my code (generalized where needed):

I am trying to perform a unit test where I need my mock object to perform an action AFTER a sequence of EXPECT_CALLS, or as an action on one of them while allowing the mocked call to return first.

Here is my non working unit test:

I'm trying to make a function that shows a dialog where the user should select to confirm the deletion of an entry on a table or to cancel it.

I've searched about that topic and thats what I've reached in terms of code:

Currently getting the net::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID when trying to access my application through the ALB.

This is my current setup:

• SSL Certificate created that covers example.com & *.example.com using AWS Certificate Manager.
• 2 server ec2 instances behind a load balancer and 2 client instances behind another load balancer.
• An alias record in my Route 53 hosted zone pointing to the client ALB.
• Both ALBs have the SSL certificate for example.com attached to them.
• Both ALBs have a single HTTPS: 443 listener forwarding https traffic to ec2 instances on port 80.
• The server ALB security group allows inbound traffic from the client ALB Security Group and outbound to the server instances security group.
• The applications in the client ec2 instances are React Apps pointing to the server ALB at https://xxxxxxxxxx.elb.amazonaws.com/api

Accessing the application via https://example.com causes net::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID in the console with the browser saying:

Error: The certificate for this server is invalid. You might be connecting to a server that is pretending to be “xxxxxxxxxx.elb.amazonaws.com” which could put your confidential information at risk.

I'd be happy to provide more details if it helps.

I'm creating a web app with symfony. I'm currently building the forms and as I've never used the ManyToMany relation I'm having some problem with retrieving the information.

The form I'm working with is this one:

The point is that when I'm retrieving the information of the array in the twig template, the data property inside the array shows empty, when there is Alumne's entities created. Let me show you.

Twig template (create page):

As you can see, what I pretend is to retrieve the info of every Alumne entity inside the array.

What I get doing this is:

The alumnes field is completly empty. But if I change the form Builder to this:

(I have also changed a little bit the twig template to make it more readable) It works!

And as you can see there is an Alumne created.

The point is, as you can see, the select and option tag it creates is kinda ugly, I want to custom so it can fit the rest of the forms. So that's why I need a CollectionType in the builder and I don't know what I'm doing wrong. Also if I check the dump(form.alumnes.vars.data) it shows empty.

I am learning gmock and wondering how I can make my mock object do something when one of the mocked methods is called.

I need to mock some interfaces that make use of Qt and I am trying to get Qt and Gmock to work together.

For example, I mocked a network socket interface class, gave it to a network client class via constructor based DI, and I want to tell the mock socket to call one of its methods to signal the client when connection completes, in order to pretend a connection was made.

I see there is WillOnce and it takes and "action" but the documentation I am reading doesn't really explain what kinds of things an "action" can be. All the examples simply return something or increment a global variable. Can you call methods belonging to the abstract class you are mocking?

If not, I see you can separately define a fake object and make it a member of the mock, and then delegate, but that seems like a hell of a lot of work to put into every test case that wants a different behavior.

• You have to define every single pure virtual in your interface whether you want to use it or not for that particular test case
• It seems I will have to create different fakes and therefore different mocks local to each test case, when the fake behavior differs ... For example, maybe I want open to signal in one test case a and not to signal in another

Here is a bit of example code:

I've got a git repo in my home directory to keep track of some dotfiles.

An unpleasant side effect of that, no matter where I am now, it is considered a part of the ~ repo, and it's easy to mistakenly add files to it etc.

It is somehow possible, that the repo in ~/.git listens to commands (git add, etc) ONLY if these commands are invoked directly in ~, and otherwise it just pretends to not exist, i.e. not a repository is thrown? (For example, if I invoke git add -A in ~/Documents)