RESCRIPt | REference Sequence annotation and CuRatIon Pipeline | Genomics library
kandi X-RAY | RESCRIPt Summary
kandi X-RAY | RESCRIPt Summary
REference Sequence annotation and CuRatIon Pipeline.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Return a dict of the command class to use
- Create a ConfigParser from a root
- Get the project root directory
- Extract the version information from the current working directory
- Cross validation
- Check the time of the old time
- Generate training and test and test sets
- Create the versioneer config file
- Install versioneer
- Filter sequences using vsearch
- Get data from NCBI data
- Fetch ids of ids
- Helper function for fetching query
- Filter a sequence object to a homopolymer
- Plot a sequence of sequences
- Produce a dataframe from the SILVATax file
- Compute volatility for a list of taxonomies
- Evaluate a feature classification
- Extract version information from VCS
- Filter sequences by taxon
- Perform orientation of sequences against reference sequences
- Evaluate the classification
- Filters the given taxonomy
- Scans the versioneer py file and checks if it is missing
- Trim alignments from aligned sequences
- Download data from SILVA
RESCRIPt Key Features
RESCRIPt Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on RESCRIPt
QUESTION
I'm trying to allow users to filter strings of text using a glob pattern whose only control character is *. Under the hood, I figured the easiest thing to filter the list strings would be to use Js.Re.test[https://rescript-lang.org/docs/manual/latest/api/js/re#test_], and it is (easy).
Ignoring the * on the user filter string for now, what I'm having difficulty with is escaping all the RegEx control characters. Specifically, I don't know how to replace the capture groups within the input text to create a new string.
So far, I've got this, but it's not quite right:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-02 at 14:00Let me see if I have this right; you want to implement a character matcher where everything is literal except *. Presumably the * is supposed to work like that in Windows dir commands, matching zero or more characters.
Furthermore, you want to implement it by passing a user-entered character string directly to a Regexp match function after suitably sanitizing it to only deal with the *.
If I have this right, then it sounds like you need to do two things to get the string ready for js.re.test:
- Quote all the special regex characters, and
- Turn all instances of * into .* or maybe .*?
Let's keep this simple and process the string in two steps, each one using Js.re.replace. So the list of special characters in regex are [^$.|?*+(). Suitably quoting these for replace:
QUESTION
Is there a way to efficiently implement a group by function without mutation?
Naive implementation:
- ReScript playground
- JavaScript (see below)
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-18 at 23:46You can group more simply by building an object of counts by date, and then using Object.entries and Array.map to convert that to an array of objects as required:
QUESTION
I would like to do the following. But it seems I cannot type the function parameter with one of the variant option. What would be the proper way to achieve this in rescript?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-14 at 09:58Teacher and Student are not types themselves, but constructors that construct values of type person. If you want them to have distinct types you have to make it explicit:
QUESTION
When making a promise in Rescript:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-07 at 08:33You can bind a parameter to a new name using as, i.e. ~reject as newName, and as with any binding/pattern you can use the wildcard pattern, _, to tell the compiler that you're intentionally ignoring it.
So put together it'd be:
QUESTION
I would like to make a validation function taking a name and outputting a validName type. I don't want to be able to construct values of type ValidName outside the module without using the function validateName.
I am trying to make the ValidName type private, but it makes it impossible for me to use it in the validateName function (event if it is in the same Module).
What is the right way to do this in rescript?
Here is the code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-01 at 19:14Visibility is specified in module signatures (as are type annotations, typically), not on the definitions themselves. You also don't need constructors, but should instead either make the type abstract, or the type alias private.
You can specify a module signature on a local module, as shown below, but typically you'd put it in a .resi ("interface") file. Everything you can put in a module signature you can also put in an interface file. See the docs for more.
This is how I would do it:
QUESTION
I am trying to simulate a side effect of writing to DB with rescript.
So I want to push the data in an array when calling repository.add. Js.Array.push returns an int, which I do not care about. I would like to force to return unit so that my signature shows unit which lets me know immediately that this function does a side effect.
Here is the code (and a playground here):
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-30 at 10:52A function will return unit if you return (), as you do. That isn't really the problem here. The reason the compiler complains is that you're implicitly ignoring the value returned by Js.Array.push, which is usually a mistake. You can shut the compiler up by explicitly ignoring it:
QUESTION
I have a module MyMonad that provides a bind function as (let*) operator, but also as >>= operator for old-style code.
The idea is that old code can use it as:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-20 at 00:26Many of the additions to the language or stdlib are followed by backporting libraries usually called *-shims.
For your problem, there is
QUESTION
I am pretty new to rescript and trying to understand how things are working. In my situation I would like to access a key from a variant type like this.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-10 at 16:52Is the only way to access a variant keys is to use pattern matching ?
Yes.
Although you can also deconstruct/pattern match in a let binding:
QUESTION
Given the following contrived example, is it possible to write a get function that can handle any record with an a property?
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-16 at 08:39It's not. Because records are nominally (as opposed to structurally) typed, there is no way to specify "any record with an a field". Therefore get will be inferred to have the last type the compiler saw with an a field, which is type_two.
There is however the object type, which is structural with subtyping, allowing this:
QUESTION
This compiles in ReasonML:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-27 at 07:47As pointed out by @Yawar in the comments, this short-hand is not supported at time of writing, but is likely to be at some point in the future (see https://github.com/rescript-lang/syntax/issues/2 for discussion).
And just to save a click for those coming across this, a workaround is to rewrite it using a local scope and opening the module in that scope:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install RESCRIPt
First activate your QIIME 2 environment (ver 2021.4 or later) and install relevant dependencies:.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
