ISIC2018 | Lesion attributes segmentation for melanoma detection | Machine Learning library
kandi X-RAY | ISIC2018 Summary
kandi X-RAY | ISIC2018 Summary
Deep learning models have also been applied toclassify skin diseases and segment whole lesion regions. However, lesion attribution segmentation for melanomadetection has not been well explored. Automatic detection of those skin lesion attributes can be a tremendous help forearly melanoma diagnosis. Towards this goal, the Interna-tional Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) hosts a competitionto predict the locations of five skin lesion patterns (i.e., dermoscopic attributes) in dermoscopic images. These five pat-terns are pigment network, negative network, streaks, milia-like cysts, and globules. These morphological pat-terns have been associated with clinical criteria for detectingskin disease. Below are examples of dermoscopic skin images and corresponding lesion attribute topology (figures from We noticed that not all attributes present in each skin image. Below is a summary of non-empty masks in the training data. N is the number of non-empty masks. 58.7%, 26.3% and 23.2% of the skin images have non-empty masks for pigment network, milia-like cysts, and globules, respectively. While only 7.3% 2.9% of the skin images have non-empty masks for negative network and streaks, respectively. Since segmentation is essentially a pixel-wise classification problem, a large numberof empty masks increase the number of samples in negative class. Examples of skin images and corresponding lesion attributes. For each attribute, the top row is the ground truth masks and the bottom row is the predicted masks from multi-task U-Net model. Note that many of the ground truth masks are empty, indicating no corresponding lesion attributes in the skin images. We develop a multi-task U-Net model to automatically detect lesion attributes of melanoma. In the U-Net model, we replace the encoder part of the U-Net with a pretrained VGG16 network. We further extend the model based on multi-task learning. In the middle layer and the last layer of the U-Net, we add two classification heads to classify the empty masks versus the non-empty masks. One classification head is added to the middle layer with a 1×1 convolutional layer followed by a global average pooling layer and the other is added to the last layer with a global max pooling layer. The experiment results show that the extra ancillary classification task indeed improves the performance of the segmentation task. Without any model ensemble, our multi-task U-Net model achieves a Jaccard index of 0.433 on official test data, which is the best single-model result. The loss is a combination of pixel-wise segmentation loss loss1, classification loss using the middle layer loss2 and classification loss using the last layer loss3. loss = loss1+ 0.5×loss2 + 0.5×loss3.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Validate a binary model
- Adds the probabilities to the model
- Calculate the jaccard statistics
- Run test on new images
- Write tensorboard to writer
- Write training data to log file
- Add the probabilities to the model
- Resets the state
- Return the jaccard similarity metric
- Create data loader
- Returns a pandas DataFrame containing the train_id
- Print the sum of all parameters
- Saves weights to model
ISIC2018 Key Features
ISIC2018 Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Machine Learning
QUESTION
I have trained an RNN model with pytorch. I need to use the model for prediction in an environment where I'm unable to install pytorch because of some strange dependency issue with glibc. However, I can install numpy and scipy and other libraries. So, I want to use the trained model, with the network definition, without pytorch.
I have the weights of the model as I save the model with its state dict and weights in the standard way, but I can also save it using just json/pickle files or similar.
I also have the network definition, which depends on pytorch in a number of ways. This is my RNN network definition.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-17 at 10:47You should try to export the model using torch.onnx. The page gives you an example that you can start with.
An alternative is to use TorchScript, but that requires torch libraries.
Both of these can be run without python. You can load torchscript in a C++ application https://pytorch.org/tutorials/advanced/cpp_export.html
ONNX is much more portable and you can use in languages such as C#, Java, or Javascript https://onnxruntime.ai/ (even on the browser)
A running exampleJust modifying a little your example to go over the errors I found
Notice that via tracing any if/elif/else, for, while will be unrolled
QUESTION
I'm trying to implement a gradient-free optimizer function to train convolutional neural networks with Julia using Flux.jl. The reference paper is this: https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.05955. This paper proposes RSO, a gradient-free optimization algorithm updates single weight at a time on a sampling bases. The pseudocode of this algorithm is depicted in the picture below.
I'm using MNIST dataset.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-14 at 23:47Based on the paper you shared, it looks like you need to change the weight arrays per each output neuron per each layer. Unfortunately, this means that the implementation of your optimization routine is going to depend on the layer type, since an "output neuron" for a convolution layer is quite different than a fully-connected layer. In other words, just looping over Flux.params(model)
is not going to be sufficient, since this is just a set of all the weight arrays in the model and each weight array is treated differently depending on which layer it comes from.
Fortunately, Julia's multiple dispatch does make this easier to write if you use separate functions instead of a giant loop. I'll summarize the algorithm using the pseudo-code below:
QUESTION
This question is the same with How can I check a confusion_matrix after fine-tuning with custom datasets?, on Data Science Stack Exchange.
BackgroundI would like to check a confusion_matrix, including precision, recall, and f1-score like below after fine-tuning with custom datasets.
Fine tuning process and the task are Sequence Classification with IMDb Reviews on the Fine-tuning with custom datasets tutorial on Hugging face.
After finishing the fine-tune with Trainer, how can I check a confusion_matrix in this case?
An image of confusion_matrix, including precision, recall, and f1-score original site: just for example output image
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-24 at 13:26What you could do in this situation is to iterate on the validation set(or on the test set for that matter) and manually create a list of y_true
and y_pred
.
QUESTION
I am trying to train a model using PyTorch. When beginning model training I get the following error message:
RuntimeError: CUDA out of memory. Tried to allocate 5.37 GiB (GPU 0; 7.79 GiB total capacity; 742.54 MiB already allocated; 5.13 GiB free; 792.00 MiB reserved in total by PyTorch)
I am wondering why this error is occurring. From the way I see it, I have 7.79 GiB total capacity. The numbers it is stating (742 MiB + 5.13 GiB + 792 MiB) do not add up to be greater than 7.79 GiB. When I check nvidia-smi
I see these processes running
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-23 at 06:13This is more of a comment, but worth pointing out.
The reason in general is indeed what talonmies commented, but you are summing up the numbers incorrectly. Let's see what happens when tensors are moved to GPU (I tried this on my PC with RTX2060 with 5.8G usable GPU memory in total):
Let's run the following python commands interactively:
QUESTION
I am a bit confusing with comparing best GridSearchCV model and baseline.
For example, we have classification problem.
As a baseline, we'll fit a model with default settings (let it be logistic regression):
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-04 at 21:17No, they aren't comparable.
Your baseline model used X_train
to fit the model. Then you're using the fitted model to score the X_train
sample. This is like cheating because the model is going to already perform the best since you're evaluating it based on data that it has already seen.
The grid searched model is at a disadvantage because:
- It's working with less data since you have split the
X_train
sample. - Compound that with the fact that it's getting trained with even less data due to the 5 folds (it's training with only 4/5 of
X_val
per fold).
So your score for the grid search is going to be worse than your baseline.
Now you might ask, "so what's the point of best_model.best_score_
? Well, that score is used to compare all the models used when searching for the optimal hyperparameters in your search space, but in no way should be used to compare against a model that was trained outside of the grid search context.
So how should one go about conducting a fair comparison?
- Split your training data for both models.
QUESTION
I am not able to access jupyter lab created on google cloud
I created one notebook using Google AI platform. I was able to start it and work but suddenly it stopped and I am not able to start it now. I tried building and restarting the jupyterlab, but of no use. I have checked my disk usages as well, which is only 12%.
I tried the diagnostic tool, which gave the following result:
but didn't fix it.
Thanks in advance.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-20 at 14:00You should try this Google Notebook trouble shooting section about 524 errors : https://cloud.google.com/notebooks/docs/troubleshooting?hl=ja#opening_a_notebook_results_in_a_524_a_timeout_occurred_error
QUESTION
I am new to Machine Learning.
Having followed the steps in this simple Maching Learning using the Brain.js library, it beats my understanding why I keep getting the error message below:
I have double-checked my code multiple times. This is particularly frustrating as this is the very first exercise!
Kindly point out what I am missing here!
Find below my code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-29 at 22:47Turns out its just documented incorrectly.
In reality the export from brain.js is this:
QUESTION
IF we are not sure about the nature of categorical features like whether they are nominal or ordinal, which encoding should we use? Ordinal-Encoding or One-Hot-Encoding? Is there a clearly defined rule on this topic?
I see a lot of people using Ordinal-Encoding on Categorical Data that doesn't have a Direction. Suppose a frequency table:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-04 at 06:43You're right. Just one thing to consider for choosing OrdinalEncoder
or OneHotEncoder
is that does the order of data matter?
Most ML algorithms will assume that two nearby values are more similar than two distant values. This may be fine in some cases e.g., for ordered categories such as:
quality = ["bad", "average", "good", "excellent"]
orshirt_size = ["large", "medium", "small"]
but it is obviously not the case for the:
color = ["white","orange","black","green"]
column (except for the cases you need to consider a spectrum, say from white to black. Note that in this case, white
category should be encoded as 0
and black
should be encoded as the highest number in your categories), or if you have some cases for example, say, categories 0 and 4 may be more similar than categories 0 and 1. To fix this issue, a common solution is to create one binary attribute per category (One-Hot encoding)
QUESTION
I am using sentence-transformers for semantic search but sometimes it does not understand the contextual meaning and returns wrong result eg. BERT problem with context/semantic search in italian language
by default the vector side of embedding of the sentence is 78 columns, so how do I increase that dimension so that it can understand the contextual meaning in deep.
code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-10 at 07:39Increasing the dimension of a trained model is not possible (without many difficulties and re-training the model). The model you are using was pre-trained with dimension 768, i.e., all weight matrices of the model have a corresponding number of trained parameters. Increasing the dimensionality would mean adding parameters which however need to be learned.
Also, the dimension of the model does not reflect the amount of semantic or context information in the sentence representation. The choice of the model dimension reflects more a trade-off between model capacity, the amount of training data, and reasonable inference speed.
If the model that you are using does not provide representation that is semantically rich enough, you might want to search for better models, such as RoBERTa or T5.
QUESTION
I have a table with features that were used to build some model to predict whether user will buy a new insurance or not. In the same table I have probability of belonging to the class 1 (will buy) and class 0 (will not buy) predicted by this model. I don't know what kind of algorithm was used to build this model. I only have its predicted probabilities.
Question: how to identify what features affect these prediction results? Do I need to build correlation matrix or conduct any tests?
Table example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-11 at 15:55You could build a model like this.
x = features you have. y = true_lable
from that you can extract features importance. also, if you want to go the extra mile,you can do Bootstrapping, so that the features importance would be more stable (statistical).
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install ISIC2018
You may need to replace the download link below with the new link.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page