appenv | contained bootstrapping/updating of Python applications | Continuous Deployment library

You actually already know the path to the python executable in the virtualenv, as it's the virtualenv directory + bin/python; what you'll need to take care about is the idempotency of the action, to keep spacy from attempting to re-execute those commands on subsequent playbook runs

This may be caused by the redirect in doAuth. You only should call next() if the middleware didn't render anything. this should fix:

I've never used @import to import components from a NPM package, but at the readme package you're referencing it recommends using 'import x from" svelte-material'. Also pay attention that svelte-preprocess won't be supported by the package you're referencing, take a look at the readme:

To bundle this in your own code, use a Sass processor (not a Sass Svelte preprocessor, but a Sass processor).

Today I realized that it was an easy solution.

I hesitate a bit to put this as an answer but here goes...

In uwsgi app.ini after setting processes (5 in your case, I use 4) I also set threads = 2. I don't know if this has any direct relation to the --enable-threads option because that seems to be for your app to start it's own threads, but it might help for uwsgi to have its own threads per process. Also the UWSGI documentation points out (somewhere) that more processes are not necessarily better.

Also on that, your logfile shows warnings from the scheduler that the maximum number of running instances being reached. I take this means the job you've given the scheduler is not finishing before the next scheduled run (1 minute later)? If that's the case is it stuck somewhere, blocking everything else?

Finally, if all else fails, something else from the docs (UWSGI Security and availability)

A common problem with webapp deployment is “stuck requests”. All of your threads/workers are stuck (blocked on request) and your app cannot accept more requests. To avoid that problem you can set a harakiri timer.It is a monitor (managed by the master process) that will destroy processes stuck for more than the specified number of seconds (choose harakiri value carefully).

And finally, finally :) there's a top like monitoring tool for uwsgi which might be handy to see what's going on, just

Ok it was a silly error, it was the way I was starting gunicorn, this one does the trick:

For container launched by app service

Does ENTRYPOINT ["entrypoint.sh"] get executed before ENTRYPOINT ["echo"]?

No, ENTRYPOINT ["echo"] overrides ENTRYPOINT ["entrypoint.sh"] of the base image.

So ENTRYPOINT ["echo"] will run and it will receive:

command: - uwsgi - "--socket /var/www/someapp/someapp.sock" - "--chmod-socket=666" - "--module someapp.wsgi" - "--master" - "--die-on-term"

as argument

Assume there is no entry point in current image, does current image execute base image entry point and then command instruction launch uwsgi process with pid 1?

Yes entrypoint.sh will run. It will receive command value as argument.

entrypoint code exec $@ means: execute all the script (enterypoint.sh) arguments (uwsgi...).

exec by definition doesn't generate new process, rather loads uwsgi into memory of existing process. Because exec process is launched with pid 1, uwsgi will receive pid 1.

You, first, need to enable bean overriding with;