webb | one Web Crawler , Web Parser | Crawler library

Issues Fixed! so my assumptions was in fact correct but I had some issues in the code of my test scenario, so below I've shown a working example. I've adapted one of the MS Examples so the code exmaple is different from what was shown in my original question, but at least the below works so can move forward from here...

IMPORTANT NOTE: After scratching head and having no *** hair left! in order for the example below to work, I had to change the mode of the SignalR Service in Azure from serverless to default:

Azure Function App Code

Function.cs File:

The function below is running on a trigger timer, so every 5 seconds I generate a simple test message "This is a test message!" and we send this to the Azure SignalR Service.

I'm just stuck on how to generate the new dbcontext with the database change that I've made, The App is Web Form .NET 4.7.2 Framework

The last version of EF Core to have .NET Framework compatibility was 3.1. So for a .NET Framework application you should stick with EF 6.

strace has tables where these are listed. You can find the x86_64 calls here.

Thanks for your help guys

It turned out the problem was ScriptApp.getService().getUrl() . When I updated the deployment, one view got updated but the Grammar view somehow got stuck on the old version! I tried re-deploying many times, and even archiving all the old views but this just gave an error message that the file couldn't be loaded.

The solution was to put the full URL for each view into every place it was referenced. So no more new deployments, only new versions from now on.

try this

$this->validate($request, ['image' => 'image|mimes:jpeg,png,jpg,gif,svg|max:2048',]);

If you didn't have any condition on employee ID at all you'd end up with records where a self-match had occurred, e.g. the results would show "Gracie Gardner was hired on the same day as Gracie Gardner"

We could then put ON e1.employee_id <> e2.employee_id - this would prevent Gracie matching with Gracie, but you'd then find "Gracie Gardner was hired on the same day as Summer Payne" and "Summer Payne was hired on the same day as Gracie Gardner" - i.e. you'd get "duplicate records" in terms of "person paired with person", each name being mentioned both ways round

Using greater than prevents this, and effectively means that any given pair of names only appears once. Because Gracie's ID is less than Summer's, you'll get Gracie in e1 paired with Summer in e2 but you won't get Summer in e1 paired with Gracie in e2

Another way of visualizing it is with a square/matrix

The text is not being truncated -- only the display in the lower window is truncated, as noted by the ellipsis at the end.

You can prove this in several ways.

• LEN(original text) with the leading and trailing double quotes removed; and the doubled-double quotes replaced by single-double quotes will have the same length as Text.Length([Audit Data])
• Enter a custom column with something like =Text.End([Audit Data],150) and you'll see what you are missing in the preview at the bottom of the page.
• Split [Audit Data] by a fixed number (eg 1000) and you'll see the entire string in the different columns.
• Load the data table to an Excel worksheet and you will see that no text has been lost

I've made some adjustments to your code to make it work.

• First, I moved all the scripts tags to the end of the tag and placed them in order.
• Second, I added d3-fetch.js as a dependency and removed the duplicated d3.js one.
• Third, I disabled all the auto update code in order to test the code and avoid becoming insane.

When I opened the HTML file with my browser without using a web server, the request for the file failed so the code didn't work. I installed Live Server in VSCode and it started to work immediately, being able to read the file and append elements to the body.

Another error I had was Uncaught TypeError: document.getElementsByTagName(...)[totalimages] is undefined as it could read the data. Once I could open the file, that error disappeared.

"it becomes a huge mess". Yes it will. Let's look at part of your code. Remember that when you use append you return a selection of the appended elements: