arpeggio | interatomic interactions in molecular structures | Genomics library

by harryjubb Python Version: mcsm_v1.0 License: GPL-3.0

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(5)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | arpeggio Summary

arpeggio is a Python library typically used in Healthcare, Pharma, Life Sciences, Artificial Intelligence, Genomics applications. arpeggio has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has build file available, it has a Strong Copyleft License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Calculation of interatomic interactions in molecular structures

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

arpeggio has a low active ecosystem.

It has 56 star(s) with 23 fork(s). There are 8 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 1 open issues and 22 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 106 days. There are 1 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of arpeggio is mcsm_v1.0

Quality

arpeggio has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

arpeggio has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

arpeggio code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

arpeggio is licensed under the GPL-3.0 License. This license is Strong Copyleft.

Strong Copyleft licenses enforce sharing, and you can use them when creating open source projects.

Reuse

arpeggio releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Build file is available. You can build the component from source.

Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

arpeggio saves you 1484 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.

It has 3310 lines of code, 27 functions and 5 files.

It has high code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed arpeggio and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into arpeggio implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

Parses a selection list
Make a PyMOL string from an entity
Compute the similarity between two Sift objects
Return a human - readable string representation of a sift match
Calculates the angle of a group
Compute the angle between two groups
Determine if a halogen atom is a weak hydrogen bond
Returns the angle between two points
Returns the first neighbour of an atom
Checks if the given donor atom is weak
Check if a donor is a hydrogen bond
Update the sift sift s sift
Checks if the donor atom is a Bond atom
Update the actual fsift
Updates the atom sift
Turn an integer into an integer
Add a vertex without duplicates
Return the maximum memory usage

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

arpeggio Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for arpeggio.

arpeggio Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for arpeggio.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on arpeggio

Why does TextX ignore \n in string literal, but not in regex?

Parsing a table using preferably grammar or regex

Arpeggio can't go back after a catch

How to modify an element attribute using jQuery or CSS?

PEG grammar ordered choice failure

QUESTION

Why does TextX ignore \n in string literal, but not in regex?

Asked 2022-Mar-01 at 19:30

TL;DR: The issue will be fixed in version 3.0 of TextX. The workaround is to use regex for matching escaped (\) characters, such as \n.

FULL QUESTION: Using TextX, I am parsing a homegrown mark-up language, where paragraph and line breaks are significant. I think I am missing a fundamental understanding when trying to match new lines: Why are "\n" and "\n\n" not working, while their regex counterparts /\n/ and /\n\n/ do?

NOTE: whitespace is redefined at parser level to exclude \n using ws=" \t".

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Mar-01 at 17:16

It is the problem addressed in the current development version. Please see this textX issue.

The fix will be a part of the upcoming textX 3.0 release.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71212348

QUESTION

Parsing a table using preferably grammar or regex

Asked 2021-Mar-27 at 02:57

few days i am stuck; i would like to parse a big document with many page amongts things it has tables like this one :

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Mar-27 at 02:57

i found the solution thanks to the hints from @JeffC by asking about the number of spaces. Here is the grammar:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66810272

QUESTION

Arpeggio can't go back after a catch

Asked 2020-Oct-11 at 09:34

Here's a simple code to understand:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Oct-11 at 09:34

Arpeggio is based on PEG formalism and it never backtracks a successful ordered choice match.

A quote from the Wikipedia PEG article:

The fundamental difference between context-free grammars and parsing expression grammars is that the PEG's choice operator is ordered. If the first alternative succeeds, the second alternative is ignored.

So you have to be careful when ordering your RHS rule references in an ordered choice. The rule of the thumb would be to put more specific matches at the front. In your case line line is more specific and should be tried first.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64296835

QUESTION

How to modify an element attribute using jQuery or CSS?

Asked 2020-Aug-25 at 15:17

I am trying to change this:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Aug-19 at 14:50

first grab the elements dataset and check if 380, then if it is just grap the element by classname and style width to 450px.

I suspect though that you don't really want to set data-width and data-height, rather, set width and height and then access those directly.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63489162

QUESTION

PEG grammar ordered choice failure

Asked 2020-Jun-23 at 12:58

I have a PEG grammar for a toy DSL using the Python Arpeggio package:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Jun-23 at 11:11

In PEG the order of expressions is OrderedChoice is important. When the parser try item1+ it is enough to match at least one of item1 to succeed and the whole ordered choice is then considered successful.

In general, always put more specific matches at the beginning and more general towards the end of ordered choice.

Update: there is a nice explanation in Ambiguity detection and influence of rule order on language that is matched section on Wikipedia.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62525111

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install arpeggio

Stuck? Start here, and see also the FAQ.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: