btk | 虚拟蓝牙键盘（BlueTooth Keyboard）

It's a little weird, the "string" module is a part of the standard library. Could you try this code?

The expensive part with Vector is getting hold of the initialized Vector in the first place - so the main trick that recent code uses is to cheat and use MemoryMarshal.Cast<,>() to access existing memory by changing a Span into a Span>; in the case of string, you'd probably have to use ushort instead of char to convince it that it knows what it is doing (char and ushort are the same thing in memory terms), so:

I can say for certain GCC is wrong to inherit that constructor. Primarily because

[namespace.udecl]

3 In a using-declaration used as a member-declaration, each using-declarator's nested-name-specifier shall name a base class of the class being defined. If a using-declarator names a constructor, its nested-name-specifier shall name a direct base class of the class being defined.

But the kicker is that B::A doesn't even name a constructor at all.

[class.qual]

2 In a lookup in which function names are not ignored and the nested-name-specifier nominates a class C:

• if the name specified after the nested-name-specifier, when looked up in C, is the injected-class-name of C (Clause [class]), or
• in a using-declarator of a using-declaration that is a member-declaration, if the name specified after the nested-name-specifier is the same as the identifier or the simple-template-id's template-name in the last component of the nested-name-specifier,

the name is instead considered to name the constructor of class C. [ Note: For example, the constructor is not an acceptable lookup result in an elaborated-type-specifier so the constructor would not be used in place of the injected-class-name.  — end note ] Such a constructor name shall be used only in the declarator-id of a declaration that names a constructor or in a using-declaration. [ Example:

Edit your line for:

You reference the mk reactive value without parentheses, which are required because technically the object is a reactive function. This should solve your issue:

You can use a single sed command like this:

Try something along these lines:

So at last I have found a solution. It took me time to understand that there is indeed no way to animate the fill of the shape, but we can trick CA engine by creating a filled circle by making the stroke (i.e. the border of the arc) extremely wide, so that it fills the whole circle!

I assume you feed search:values with the same $q as search:search, but you are passing in $valueOptions which doesn't have the constraint definition for context.

Add the values definition to $options, and use that for search:values.

HTH!