django-uwsgi | Django related examples/trick/modules for uWSGI | Learning library
kandi X-RAY | django-uwsgi Summary
kandi X-RAY | django-uwsgi Summary
Django related examples/trick/modules for uWSGI
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Wrapper around spool
- Calls a spooler instance
- Convert to UTF - 8
- Convert vars to spooler
- Manage the wrapper function
- Try to decode a value
- Decode vars from spooler
- Sends an email
- Sends email messages
- Sends an email message
- Load a template source
- Symbolize name
- Record uWSGI stats
- Collect stats from uwsgi
- Wrapper for spool
- Decorate a function into a spool object
django-uwsgi Key Features
django-uwsgi Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on django-uwsgi
QUESTION
I'm looking into moving some of our web servers to docker containers. The jwilder/nginx-proxy image looks interesting, and seems to do what we want, but how would one properly deploy a flask application in a container, and have it work with the jwilder/nginx-proxy server? To be clear, the flask application would also be running in a docker container.
In a separate, but related question, how would one do this for a django app?
It looks like there's a popular tiangolo/uwsgi-nginx-flask image, and a similar dockerfiles/django-uwsgi-nginx image. In this setup, from what I understand, the nginx-proxy container would direct traffic to the uwsgi-nginx-flask or django-uwsgi-nginx container. Is this a common way to do this?
The main thought I had was that in such a setup, we're running extra instances of nginx - one for every python/django app. Is this common? Or is it possible/beneficial/common to somehow have the nginx-proxy talk directly to uwsgi within the python app container?
I see that the nginx-proxy image has a VIRTUAL_PROTO=uwsgi
option that other containers can be started with. Is this something that can be used to make things more efficient? Or is it more effort than it's worth?
Edit: Or is the nginx instance that accompanies the flask/django project beneficial, since it can be used to serve static content, without which, you would need to configure the nginx-proxy image with the location of every project's static files?
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jan-17 at 05:36Personally, I prefer to have Django have one container, NGINX in separate container, other applications in other containers etc. For that I prefer to use docker-compose. You can checkout my implementation about using Django + NGINX + PostgreSQL in here.(I have not used jwilder/nginx-proxy, instead I have used official NGINX docker image)
But putting NGINX and Python server in same container does not sound that bad. I have used a lightweight alpine based images for deploying python, for example:
QUESTION
I was trying to run a Django project with Docker + Nginx + MySQL, by following this Link After successfull build, by running
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Sep-18 at 06:06So as explained you should use mysql
as host and root
as USER
in your database config :
QUESTION
I configured my django-uwsgi-nginx using docker compose with the following files.
From browser "http://127.0.0.1:8000/" works fine and gives me the django default page
From browser "http://127.0.0.1:80" throws a 502 Bad Gateway
dravoka-docker.conf
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jun-18 at 10:45When you say from the docker instance , you are running curl from with in the container ?? or you are running the curl command from your local ?
if you are running it from your local , update your docker-compose's web
service to following
QUESTION
I'm trying to run dockerfiles/django-uwsgi-nginx with my django project.
https://github.com/dockerfiles/django-uwsgi-nginx
1.I replaced 'app' folder by my django project folder.
2.Comment out this line form Dockerfile
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-May-04 at 16:35Probably there's something wrong when you "replaced 'app' folder [with your] django project folder". The dockerfile is configured to refer to that directory by the name /.../app
, and if you replace it with /.../myproject
it'll fail to find it. You probably want to edit the uwsgi.ini
file to point to the new app folder's name. That is probably the only change you'll need, but there might be other references to the original /.../app
path that need to get tweaked as well.
QUESTION
This an ancient Django (v1.3.7) application that I'm migrating over to a Docker setup. The basic framework comes from this dockerfiles repo.
I can get the app running fine using Django's built in dev server (./manage.py runserver
), but I'd like to have this served using uWSGI/Nginx in production.
I can get uwsgi to run without errors when I call it from a bash prompt within the the container like so: uwsgi --http :8000 --wsgi-file /home/docker/code/siteweb/glrimon.wsgi
However, when I try to import my wsgi file from the Django shell I get the same import error.
Here is the what gets logged when I startup the container (which calls /usr/local/bin/uwsgi --ini /home/docker/code/uwsgi.ini
via supervisord):
ANSWER
Answered 2017-May-10 at 20:01Two ideas.
I wonder if
pythonpath = ./siteweb
is relative to the initial current working directory? When you run it manually, are you already in/home/docker/code
? Try adding the following to theDockerfile
:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install django-uwsgi
You can use django-uwsgi like any standard Python library. You will need to make sure that you have a development environment consisting of a Python distribution including header files, a compiler, pip, and git installed. Make sure that your pip, setuptools, and wheel are up to date. When using pip it is generally recommended to install packages in a virtual environment to avoid changes to the system.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page