Aging | Epigenomic enrichment analysis of age-related genomic | Genomics library

A brute-force approach might be to use least() to decide whether to use the column quantity or the remainder from adding up all the columns to the left; with greatest() to stop any negative values. Something like:

For data.table, this is mostly a dupe of How to perform join over date ranges using data.table?, though that doesn't provide the RHS[LHS, on=.(..)] method.

I've taken your simplified configured with just 2 nodes using a non-wildcard queue with redistribution-delay of 0, and I reproduced the behavior you're seeing on my local machine (i.e. without Kubernetes). I believe I see why the behavior is such, but in order to understand the current behavior you first must understand how redistribution works in the first place.

In a cluster every time a consumer is created the node on which the consumer is created notifies every other node in the cluster about the consumer. If other nodes in the cluster have messages in their corresponding queue but don't have any consumers then those other nodes redistribute their messages to the node with the consumer (assuming the message-load-balancing is ON_DEMAND and the redistribution-delay is >= 0).

In your case however, the node with the messages is actually down when the consumer is created on the other node so it never actually receives the notification about the consumer. Therefore, once that node restarts it doesn't know about the other consumer and does not redistribute its messages.

I see you've opened ARTEMIS-3321 to enhance the broker to deal with this situation. However, that will take time to develop and release (assuming the change is approved). My recommendation to you in the mean-time would be to configure your client reconnection which is discussed in the documentation, e.g.:

The diagram is confusing, since it only shows associations, but regrouping them in an unexpected manner. It looks more like a decision tree than a real class diagram.

First improvements you need to consider:

• Pfizer BioNTech, Moderna and AstraZeneca are each a Vaccine: you should show this with a generalization from the specific vaccine to the general vaccine.

• age 65+ seems not a good candidate for a class: an object of a class keeps the class during its whole life. But citizen do not change class at 65. Age is a (derived) property of Citizen. The wording "astrazeneca vaccine cannot be given to people older than 65" moreover is an expression of a constraint.

• Finally, if you manage vaccines, you need to manage also shots. When you write "citizen can only get one" you probably mean "one kind": the vaccines that you mention do in principle require 2 shots. And in most countries around the world, the two shots have to be of the same vaccine, which is another contraint. The remaining question is then if 65+ constraint applies to the first shot or the second?

This would lead us to a diagram that looks as follows:

Additional thoughts:

• You could manage the shots by making the association Vaccination an association class.

• There is an issue in the regarding the open/closed principle: if you'd add new vaccines, you might have to add different constraints on some. Alternatives:

  • Make Vaccine an abstract class (or an interface), with some more operations that need to be implemented by the concrete classes: getRequiredMinAge(), getRecommendedMinAge(), getRecommendedMaxAge(), getrequiredMaxAge(), instead of hard-coding the constraint.
  • Use a method Vaccine::checkCompatibility(c: Citizen) transfering the constraint verification to the Vaccine class

• One could wonder if subclassing the vaccines is really required.

You can loop through all the dropdown containers and style them with display:none before you add display:block to the clicked element like this:

I am just a parent volunteer for this swim club. I am dismayed by the willingness of some users' to penalize someone instead of asking me to clarify my question.

The CMS is used by TeamUnify - their support staff don't even know what company created it. I don't think this would have helped anyone.

Anyone can see by my score that I am new user. It's a difficult thing when a person doesn't even know the proper language to use to ask a question - I did the best I could at the time.

I did find an apparently simple solution using pure CSS adapting information from this stackoverflow page. It took me a few days. I felt I should post this to close the question. Thanks to those whom offered positive feedback.

Fiddle

I guess you're looking for a Time Difference between now and lastWriteTime date. If that's the case you can do something like this:

It makes a call to api.test.mywebsite.com

...

domain=.test.mywebsite.com

These need to be the same hostname

The problem is that you are mixing versions of the libraries which do not match and do not work together.

You define the parent as Spring Boot 2.3.5, a version which uses Spring 5.2 but later define the webflux version to 5.3.6. The Spring Data Elasticsearch version 4.1.8 also is built with Spring 5.3.2. I didn't check the recactor and netty versions in detail, but there probably is some conflict as well - it seems that in your pom you defined these dependencies with the versions from Spring Boot 2.4.5 but keep the parent version on 2.3.5.

Your application runs with the following pom (I set the parent to 2.4.5 and removed unneeded explicit dependencies):