impersonator | Ruby library to record and replay object interactions | Mock library
kandi X-RAY | impersonator Summary
kandi X-RAY | impersonator Summary
Impersonator is a Ruby library to record and replay object interactions. When testing, you often find services that are expensive to invoke, and you need to use a double instead. Creating stubs and mocks for simple scenarios is easy, but, for complex interactions, things get messy fast. Stubbing elaborated canned response and orchestrating multiple expectations quickly degenerates in brittle tests that are hard to write and maintain.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Instantiates an object .
- Create a new recording recording .
- Raises an error if an object is missing .
- Validates method signature .
- Creates a new instance
- Invokes the given method .
- Invoke a method with the configuration .
- Revers the method for the given block .
- Defines all methods
- Finish all methods
impersonator Key Features
impersonator Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on impersonator
QUESTION
I have json log file(json delimiter /n) and need spark struct type but every json first field name different in my txt file how can I do it ?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-27 at 18:53Step 1: read the Json file as simple text file using textFile:
QUESTION
We have an application which parses the Audit Logs emitted by Azure AD. More specifically we are parsing the 'Update application' log to detect when a new Role has been added to an Application (see example below).
We would like to find out more information about the "DirectAccessGrantTypes" and "ImpersonationAccessGrantTypes" fields. If someone can point us to documentation for this that would be great.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-09 at 07:26From article > View reports & logs in entitlement management - Azure AD | Microsoft Docs
When Azure AD receives a new request, it writes an audit record, in which the Category is
EntitlementManagementand the Activity is typically User requests access package assignment. In the case of adirect assignmentcreated in the Azure portal, the Activity field of the audit record isAdministrator directly assigns user to access package, and the user performing the assignment is identified by the ActorUserPrincipalName.
Application Impersonation is basically an administrator-managed, not user-managed permission. Impersonate access grants logs gives information ex:count., of users given consent by the admin to access the application to impersonate user.
ImpersonationAccessGrantTypes gives count or info of access grants by admin on behalf of user whereas DirectAccessGrantTypes gives info about the users who directly access the application ,as they are already assigned by admin.
Reference: Multiple Client applications authorisation to WebApi (microsoft.com)
QUESTION
About the sample "https://github.com/azure-ad-b2c/samples/tree/master/policies/impersonation".
Someone who has already used it, can you comment on how you handled the authentication logs? I noticed in the B2C Logs both the user who is "Impersonated" and the user who is "Impersonator", I did not find any records that indicate that there was an "impersonation" process.
The Token generated in this process is for the "Impersonator" user, and has information about him, is it possible to bring information about the "Impersonated" user?
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-17 at 18:20There will be nothing official in the logs generated by AAD B2C for this impersonation, and AAD B2C does not know the context of your AAD B2C policy. It can only understand that a token is issued for a particular user, not a custom process that allowed it.
What you can do is use App Insights to inject your own custom events to create logs. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory-b2c/analytics-with-application-insights?pivots=b2c-custom-policy
QUESTION
I have an app that users would run locally on their desktop, which calls into an API on my server externally.
I can obtain the user's Windows domain and name through the WindowsIdentity API. But I'd like to store a unique identifier/token on our side which I can compare subsequent logins with to ensure it's the same domain user and not an impersonator.
I cannot ask the user for credentials, as the login process is for beginner users and they need to be automatically logged in when opening the app. I'm looking through the WindowsIdentity API looking for some unique ID, but not sure how it would last through password changes on the user's domain.
Edit: Perhaps a claim off the WindowsIdentity.GetCurrent.Claims collection might contain something useful.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-21 at 14:12The following claim is enough to unique identify a user in an AD environment:
http://schemas.microsoft.com/ws/2008/06/identity/claims/primarysid
Obtain this from:
WindowsIdentity.GetCurrent.Claims
QUESTION
So I have a few instances where I'd like to be able to do this but essentially I'd like to be able to wrap all calls to a Superclass in a derived type. Right now I'm trying to wrap all calls to base method in an Impersonator but I can see other uses for this as well.
An example being
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-05 at 17:23From a good design perspective, I would advise not to do this for 2 reasons:
- If catching exception is the sole purpose, then don't do it. Catching and swallowing system exceptions is a bad practice
- If you want to do some pre-setup or post-processing on every method of base then may be you should choose
compositionrather thaninheritancehere.
However, if you have made up your mind then using an array of delegates can solve your problem.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install impersonator
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
