tiller | dynamic configuration file generation tool | Continuous Deployment library

By default, the ingress controller proxies incoming requests to your backend using the HTTP protocol.

You backend service is expecting requests in HTTPS though, so you need to tell nginx ingress controller to use HTTPS.

You can do so by adding an annotation to the Ingress resource like this:

The error comes from this line in the inverse_transform source code:

The IBM Cloud Shell is a preconfigured shell environment and thus you don't have the ability to install packages/binaries of your choosing to it. You're instead restricted to what packages are already installed.

Additionally, the IBM Cloud Shell supports both helm version 2 and version 3, and both are installed.

To use helm v3, use the following command: helm3

To use helm v2, you use the command you're currently using: helm

If packages and binaries you need are not installed into the IBM Cloud Shell, you will instead want to configure your local terminal with IBM Cloud, and then install the packages and binaries you need.

See the below link for installing and setting up the IBM CLI locally to work with your resources on IBM Cloud. https://cloud.ibm.com/docs/cli?topic=cli-getting-started

If you want SSL termination to happen at the server instead at the ingress/LoadBalancer, you can use a something called SSL Passthrough. Load Balancer will then not terminate the SSL request at the ingress but then your server should be able to terminate those SSL request. Use these configuration in your ingress.yaml file depending upon your ingress class

But would like to know the node in which the pod was running earlier.

If a pod is killed with ExitCode: 137, e.g. when it used more memory than its limit, it will be restarted on the same node - not re-scheduled. For this, check your metrics or container logs.

But Pods can also be killed due to over-committing a node, see e.g. How to troubleshoot Kubernetes OOM and CPU Throttle.

As already discussed in the comments the Ingress Controller will be created in the ingress-nginx namespace instead of the kube-system namespace. Other than that the rest of the tutorial should work as expected.

If you do consider that the output needs to be in this shape (and not flattened), the easiest (and also correct solution in my opinion) is to have a multi-output network, each output having a layers.Dense(30,activation='softmax').

You would have something like:

You are not using parameter correctly and there is one more error:

• You can have initial equations for parameters with fixed=false, but it doesn't seem like B_array is a parameter since there's a normal equation for it. So remove parameter in front of B_array.
• And the initial equation for B_array will not work (see below); erase it to get started
• Alternatively you have to write B_array(each fixed=false) and ensure that there initial equations for all elements of B_array not just one row.
• You have variables that aren't used (at the moment) - just remove their declarations: f, B, R, v (unless there are equations that you haven't given).

Initial equations are only intended to fix states (and sometimes parameters); and the idea is that variables must satisfy the normal equations and the initial equations. Thus having an initial equation that looks like the normal equation doesn't work.

Added: If the goal is to write your own time-discretized system of equations that doesn't use Modelica for differential equations I see two possibilities:

• Turn it into a traditional algorithm in a function so that you have parameter Real B_array[T,N]=myDiscretization(...); and everything inside the function myDiscretization
• Or just have everything as equations; Real B_array[T,N] in the main model.

A tool should be able to see that the equations are parametric and only solve them once.

In both cases you have to be really careful about indices:

• Above it is i in 1:(N-1) but using Q_array[j,i-1].
• The initial conditions are for B_array[1,:], but there are normal equations for B_array[1,:] as well

So should the initial equations be for B_array[:,1] and the loop for i in 2:N instead, since that ensures that all elements have an equation? Or is it subtler?

I found the problem. Since the "host-provisioner" takes care of creating PV we should not pass the volumeName in our PVC yaml file. When I removed that field the provisioner could make a PV and bound my PVC to it and now my pod has started.

Now my PVC is: