deprec | master respository for deprec - deployment recipes | Continuous Deployment library

Seems to be a prime case for fancy indexing (advanced indexing).

Something like this should do the trick, though I didn't verify it on an actual image. I've added a section to reconstruct the image in the beginning, because it is easier to work with the array as a whole than broken into parts. Likely, you can refactor this and avoid splitting it to begin with.

You can just call it this way as it recommends in the docs here

Example from the docs:

@poppinss\utils\build\src\Helpers\string.js:241 uses optional chaining which is only supported from Node.js 14

Using Node.js v14.15 will fix the problem. I personally had this problem with Node.js 12 and Node.js 14.16. I switched to Node.js v14.15.1 and it worked instantly.

We can use across (used dplyr 1.0.6 version)

What's happening is that all of your methods are being run. The code continues to execute even after a response has been sent, and if you try to send a response later in the code, it will throw this error.

This is because you are not using await properly. You should not be using .then with await. If you use .then(), when you return it will only return inside the callback function, but not in the outside function, so the code later will still execute. Try using something like this:

You are using paginate() incorrectly.

Check this:

Note that you cannot use local filesystem paths when uploading files to the ReCap service. You're basically telling the ReCap server "download these 7 files from C:\Dataset\FlowerPot..." but the server obviously cannot access those.

To fix this, you have to either:

• make your photos accessible via some public URLs (for example, by uploading them to a temporary S3 bucket), or
• add the actual content of the images to the Axios request, for example, like so:

I'm the morphia dev so there's some bias here but i'll try to be fair. when i first started building the pojo support in to the driver (i used to work for mongodb) my goal was to build as close to an ODM as possible in the driver so that morphia, such as it was, would only need to be a thin veneer on the driver. Some of my plans never came to fruition as I left the company mid-effort. That said, it came pretty close.

I know of several projects that are happily using the pojo codecs. If they fit your needs, then I would suggest to just go with that. For my own perspective, I think morphia offers a fair bit that the driver doesn't (to my knowledge.) Morphia supports annotation driven index and document validation definitions, and collection caps, e.g. It's a bit more powerful and forgiving in mapping. e.g., morphia can map non-String keyed Maps as fields and I don't think the driver supports. Morphia supports lifecycle events but the driver does not and last I checked it seemed like Morphia's generics support had a slight edge. (Granted that edge is probably an extreme edge case that most won't run in to. It's been a while so the details are fuzzy.)

There are a few other features that Morphia has that the driver doesn't (transparent reference support, e.g.) and some features I have planned that the driver will never support (build-time generated codecs to eliminate most/all reflection at runtime, e.g.).

So do we still need Morphia? It depends on what you want to do. I plan on working on Morphia until no one needs it, though. :)

Use git filter-branch for what it's good for, use git filter-repo for what it's better for. I doubt it's possible to make filter-repo do what you're after at all, or at any rate not nearly so well.

I recommend simply ignoring most of the criticisms leveled at git filter-branch, particularly the ones in the filter-repo readme, as regrettably overstated. Put export FILTER_BRANCH_SQUELCH_WARNING=1 in ~/.bashrc and be done with it.