bytecount | Counting occurrences of a given byte

Here are some ideas:

• The arguments do not seem to be null terminated, so you should use %.*s to specify a maximum length to read from _wndMSG.
• The size argument to swprintf_s should include space for the null terminator.
• The C Standard specifies that the argument type for %s should be a pointer to char, not wchar_t. Unless Microsoft has a different convention, you should use %ls for an LPCWCH argument.

Try using this:

It looks pretty close the this testing sample from OkHttp.

https://github.com/square/okhttp/blob/f8fd4d08decf697013008b05ad7d2be10a648358/okhttp-testing-support/src/main/kotlin/okhttp3/UppercaseResponseInterceptor.kt

It turns out that, for some reason, converting AVAudioCompressedBuffer that way fails to include the buffer's packetDescriptions. These are stored as a C-Style array of AudioStreamPacketDescriptions structs in the buffer. By creating a Codable struct (PacketDescription) and mapping the descriptions objects separately the reassembled buffer worked as expected.

Some ideas:

1. Run the server inside the Java profiler. For example JProfiler (it costs money).

2. Try ServletResponse.setBufferSize(...)

3. Check, if you have some filters configured in the application.

4. Check the output buffer of the application server. In case of the Tomcat it could be quite tricky. It has a long list of possible buffers:

https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.5-doc/config/http.html

Always write loops as simple as possible. for(uint16_t ii=0;ii!=63;ii++) has a weird name ii for no reason. i stands for iterator, what does ii stand for? Also it checks != 63 for no reason.

An idiomatic for loop is written as for(uint16_t i=0; i and deviating from that form is often "code smell".

I have generally found that it will be in the same order as the properties are declared in your class. However, if you want to be certain they are in a particular order, I would use both.

long& represents a reference type for a long and should be replaced with ref long. It’s then assigning the address of the m_position field to the local variable (making local an alias for it), then checking for arithmetic overflow when adding the byte count to it. Not entirely sure about the caret, in managed C++ it’s a hat to instruct for GC of object, so I suppose that’s what it’s doing. When the arithmetic check completes successfully, the m_position field via local var is set to the current value plus byteCount.

The UploadBlockRequest is one piece in the file upload procedure. You need 3 distinct requests:

The naive approach would be to just transcribe the algorithm to Python: