docker-config | Docker configuration files for my local development | Continuous Deployment library
kandi X-RAY | docker-config Summary
kandi X-RAY | docker-config Summary
This is a basic framework for building a flexible local WordPress development environment using docker. PHP (versions 5.2-5.5 available) Nginx or Apache MySQL Memcached Elasticsearch.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of docker-config
docker-config Key Features
docker-config Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on docker-config
QUESTION
I have a Docker image from a private registry that is used for a team project.
A Docker-compose.yml is git-cloned by each team member to allow for ready-to-go config of volume, env and ports for the container.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-19 at 07:12Well turns out it was a bug on AWS side. I've found a very similar question
AWS EB docker-compose deployment from private registry access forbidden
the current solution was to employ the deploy hooks instead to either login do docker or copy the authfile.
QUESTION
The build step is triggered only if there is change on Dockerfile-pentaho.
The run step needs to run everytime, if the build step was triggered I want to get the image with CI_PIPELINE_ID tag, if not I want to run it with the latest tag.
I need to run the step "run" with the script below if the build step is triggered:
- docker run --rm $PENTAHO_IMAGE:$CI_PIPELINE_ID --v files/pentaho/reps/:/pentaho-di/repo/
And if not I Need to run the script below:
- docker run --rm $PENTAHO_IMAGE:latest --v files/pentaho/reps/:/pentaho-di/repo/
I've tried to create a file with touch $CI_PROJECT_DIR/success
on build step and check if it exists on run step, but I can't get it to work.
here's my gitlab-ci.yml.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-11 at 12:04I've got it working with artifacts.
The final gitlab-ci:
QUESTION
I am not able to connect a dockerized Spring Boot API managed by Kubernetes via Docker Desktop (Windows) to a local instance of Postgres. Error is as follows:
...
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-06 at 01:31Kubernetes with Docker runs in the same docker VM, so I'm assuming the /etc/hosts
file that you are referring to is the one on your Windows machine.
I'm also assuming that you ran Postgres exposing 5432
with something like this:
QUESTION
I want to execute a command using ansible 2.9.10 in remote machine, first I tried like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-05 at 20:09your playbook should work fine, you just have to add some indentation after the shell
clause line, and change the >
to |
:
here is the updated PB:
QUESTION
I have set up a server to host multiple websites according to this tutorial: https://blog.ssdnodes.com/blog/host-multiple-ssl-websites-docker-nginx/
I have also configured a docker-compose.yml for wordpress like they did in example 2 in the same tutorial. But when I open the website, I get an "Error establishing a database connection" Error. I remember doing this a few months back with everything working fine, but I cant remember what I did differently.
This is the error message I receive (multiple times) after typing docker-compose up
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-23 at 21:50Your yaml file works fine for me. The only thing I noticed is there's a missing database name variable in wordpress.environment (WORDPRESS_DB_NAME=wordpress
) but this defaults to wordpress
if not found. I'm pointing this out in case your actual copy has a db name other than wordpress.
This is the compose file which works fine for me:
QUESTION
I was trying to do a quick bootstrap to see some sample data in elasticsearch.
Here is where you do a Docker Compose to get a ES Cluster: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/docker.html
Next I needed to get logstash in place. I did that with: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/logstash/current/docker-config.html
When I curl my host, curl localhost:9200 it gives me the sample connection string. So i can tell it is exposed. Now when I run the logstash docker file from above, i noticed that during the bootstrap code it cant connect to: localhost:9200
I was thinking that the private network created in for elastic is fine for the cluster and that i didnt need to add logstash to it. Do I have to do something different to get the default logstash to interact with the default docker?
I have been stuck on this for awhile. My host system is Debian 9. I am trying to think of what the issues might be. I know that -p 9200:9200 would couple the ports together, but 9200 has been claimed by ES, so I'm not sure how I should be handling things. I didn't see anything on the Website though which says "To link the out of the box logstash to the out of the box elasticsearch you need to do X,Y,Z"
When attempting to create a terminal to the logstash server with -it though, it is continually bootstrapping logstash and isn't giving me a terminal to see what is going on from the inside.
What Recommendations do you have?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-08 at 08:08Add --link your_elasticsearch_container_id:elasticsearch
to the docker run command of logstash. Then the elasticsearch container will be visible to logstash under http://elasticsearch:9200
, assuming you don't have TLS and the default port is used (what will be the case if you follow the docs you refer to).
If you need filebeat or kibana in the next step, see this question I answered recently: https://stackoverflow.com/a/60122043/7330758
QUESTION
I need to migrate an ElasticSearch/Logstash process from Windows to Docker. This process works fine in Windows (Elasticsearch and Logstash are services where Logstash reads an Oracle database to feed ElasticSearch). The problem is that when I start the Logstash container, Docker becomes unresponsive and extremely slow, for example docker ps
takes one minute. It takes another minute to kill the logstash container. I'm running this on Windows 10 Pro with Docker Desktop and followed these steps.
I downloaded the two images (elasticsearch:7.5.1 and logstash:7.5.1) and started the containers with
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-20 at 09:18Could be a resource issue. Docker runs a virtual machine on the windows host. You should check if it has enough memory, and if there is more than one core allocated to the VM.
If that’s not the issue, maybe check if virtualization is enabled in the bios for the host.
QUESTION
i'm trying to get my laravel app running in ec2 with docker containers. I have two containers one of the app and then one for nginx. I have created the ec2 instance with docker-machine
and i've also built the docker images successfully.
Running docker-compose up
also runs successfully. If I run docker ps
I see the two containers running.
So I have two containers running I would expect to go to the http://ec2-ip-addy-here.compute-1.amazonaws.com/ and see the app. My hunch is that something isn't setup on AWS side correctly, maybe the VPC? I'm a novice with AWS so I don't know what to look for. Any ideas?
I'm following this guide https://hackernoon.com/stop-deploying-laravel-manually-steal-this-docker-configuration-instead-da9ecf24cd2e
I'm also using the laradock nginx dockerfile and my own dockerfile for the app
EDIT:
It could be the networks that are created with docker-compose. I say that because I just checked and the network is being prepended with the service name. When I run docker network ls
I see a network called php-fpm_backend. Here's my docker-compose.yml file
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jun-06 at 15:51I figured this out. It was as I thought, I had to add a new security group with port 80/443 access for HTTP and HTTPS.
QUESTION
I have 2 microservices: frontend with next.js and a backend with node.js from where I fetch data via REST-APIs from the frontend.
I now have the problem, that my 2 services don't seem to communicate directly to eachother, the thing is, it works when I fetch the data at the beginnning with the getinitialProps() Method with the fetch-API. My server-side frontend finds the backend via its service-name. However, when I am doing a http-request from the client to the backend (e.g via browser form inputs). It cannot find the backend anymore? Why is that?
here is my docker-compose.yml:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-May-05 at 13:13You have to separate the server side and the client side requests. You need to use your host address for the client side requests (eg. http://localhost:7766), because your browser will not be able to reach the backend via docker alias.
You can define the server-only and public runtime config with next.config.js
.
For example:
QUESTION
I am trying to get a instance of Gitlab running on a relative path (/dev/git/) behind a Traefik proxy.
Gitlab itself works like a charm, but I have no luck with adding a Runner to the project.
The registration of the runner ist successfully, but when it grabs a job, the cloning of the repository fails with a timeout error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Mar-23 at 01:01I figured out a solution:
The job, which is running on the gitlab-runner, doesn't connect to the web
network, but to the standard bridge
network.
So I had to reconfigure the gitlab runner as followed by adding:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install docker-config
Installs Docker
Installs boot2docker
Installs Docker Compose
Initializes and starts up boot2docker
Sets up a MySQL data volume (mysqldata)
Sets up an Elasticsearch data volume (elasticsearchdata)
Before you get rolling, you'll want your boot2docker IP address in /etc/hosts along with the domains you'll be hosting from there. You can get your boot2docker IP via:.
nginx: shared-config/nginx/conf.d/
apache: shared-config/apache/sites-enabled/
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page