pritunl | Containerized Pritunl service | Continuous Deployment library
kandi X-RAY | pritunl Summary
kandi X-RAY | pritunl Summary
Containerized Pritunl service.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of pritunl
pritunl Key Features
pritunl Examples and Code Snippets
docker run -it --rm \
--name mongo \
--net host \
mongo:3.7 \
--bind_ip 127.0.0.1
docker run -it --rm \
--privileged \
--name pritunl \
--net host \
--env MONGODB_URI=mongodb://127.0.0.1:27017/pritunl \
quay.io/kato/pritunl:latest
[Unit]
Descriptio
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on pritunl
QUESTION
I am trying to use Pritunl VPN
which runs over UDP protocol, however for some reason I am only able to use VPNs which use TCP protocol. So what I am trying to achieve is to connect any VPN which uses TCP and then connect to Pritunl VPN
.
So my data first transfer over TCP from my first VPN and then from inside the first VPN, my data would transfer over Pritunl VPN
with the UDP protocol.
Is this at all possible? And how can I configure this?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-08 at 16:27You will likely run into some sort of routing error. The 1st VPN would likely kill the 2nd or vice versa
QUESTION
i found that apparently in Ubuntu 18 the whole DNS-setup is very confusing. Im connected through an pritunl VPN to my kube-cluster and im trying to use the kube-dns server. So i first tried to use https://github.com/jonathanio/update-systemd-resolved to update my DNS settings with the pushed DNS server from the VPN, but it seems that currently something is broken (https://github.com/jonathanio/update-systemd-resolved/issues/64).
As im ok with hard-coding the DNS ip somewhere, i tried putting the IP in some places: installing resolvconf and putting it in /etc/resolvconf/resolv.conf.d/head
, putting it in /etc/systemd/resolved.conf
, of course also trying to put it directly into /etc/resolv.conf
, as im a naiv person. After restarting some things a couple of times, i reached an even more confusing state:
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jun-13 at 12:40To answer my own question: I digged a bit deeper and learned a bit about avahi
, nscd
, systemd-resolve
and the magic of nsswitch
. So apparently the problem was this line in my /etc/nsswitch.conf
:
QUESTION
Similar question for mac Pritunl error on macos
Pritunl VPN shows error. cannot communicate with service. Please try restarting.
Solutions tried:
Exiting all pritunl programs from task manager
restarting computer
Uninstall pritunl, restart pc, install again (worked once in this case but shows error on next start)
ANSWER
Answered 2018-Sep-01 at 09:55Steps to solve:
- Press Windows + R.
- Type
services.msc
and pressOK
. - Find service whose name is "Pritunl Helper Service".
- Right click and click
start
. - Right click and click
Properties
. - Change
Startup type
toAutomatic
. - Go to
Recovery
tab. SetOn first failure
action toRestart service
. - Click
OK
.
Enjoy Pritunl.
QUESTION
We currently encounter a strange issue with the latest KDE / Archlinux releases. We cannot get KDE's Purpose framework to compile inside a docker container, although it works fine on our host machines. We tried to compile it with GCC and Clang.
The error we receive is:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Feb-23 at 00:37This is a bug with the statx syscall used by the MOC to generate the appropriate cpp files. In the default confined configuration, docker uses seccomp to prevent or allow certain syscalls, which does not allow the statx syscall. See this for allowed syscalls.
This bug has been reported on the archlinux bugtracker, qt bugtracker and docker bugtracker already, without a (permanent) solution.
Solution 1:
Run your docker container with docker run --security-opt seccomp:unconfined
as per this suggestion.
Solution 2:
Patch or downgrade to remove the statx syscall from qt.
QUESTION
I need to use gitlab-ci with docker in order to automatically build and test archlinux packages on every commit.
My .gitlab-ci.yml
:
ANSWER
Answered 2017-Apr-27 at 11:18AFAIK, there is no way to run makepkg
as root. If you run as root, makepkg
can put files anywhere on your system rather than just in $pkgdir
where that package is made from. This is stopped by using fakeroot
, which is disabled when run as root
.
A fake root is simply a subdirectory within the build directory that functions and behaves as the system's root directory. In conjunction with the fakeroot program, makepkg creates a fake root directory, and installs the compiled binaries and associated files into it, with root as owner.
I suggest you to extend the pritunl/archlinux
image and add a simple user, just for makepkg
operations.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install pritunl
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page