deployments | A place to store reproducible deployment configs | Continuous Deployment library

So inorder to secure our cluster, do we need to disable the automount property for both default and application specific service accounts?.

The design behind the default ServiceAccount is that it does not have any rights unless you give them some. So from a security point of view there is not much need to disable the mount unless you granted them access for some reason. Instead, whenever an application truly needs some access, go ahead and create a ServiceAccount for that particular application and grant it the permissions it needs via RBAC.

Since our app already live, will there be any impact by adding this to the service account s.

In case you truly want to disable the mount there won't be an impact on your application if it didn't use the ServiceAccount beforehand. What is going to happen though, is that a new Pod will be created and the existing one is being delete. However, if you properly configured readinessProbes and a rolling update strategy, then Kubernetes will ensure that there will be no downtime.

How to know the used service accounts of a pod and it's dependencies ?

You can check what ServiceAccount a Pod is mounting by executing kubectl get pods -o yaml. The output is going to show you the entirety of the Pod's manifest and the field spec.serviceAccountName contains information on which ServiceAccount the Pod is mounting.

I made my two AWS Lightsail Containers, Frontend Container with next.js and Backend Container with flask, talk to each other using the following steps:

1. Launch a Lightsail "instance" using "Amazon Linux" in the region I want to deploy my Container. Copy /etc/resolv.conf from this "Amazon Linux" instance. Update Dockerfile to overwrite /etc/resolv.conf file in my docker.
2. To make API request using http instead of https and go around the Mixed content: The page at ... was loaded over HTTPS but requested an insecure ... error, I used next.js' API route to relay the API request. So, for instance, a page on Frontend Container will make API request to /api on the same Container and the /api route will make http request to Backend Container.
3. API route was properly coded with security measures so that users cannot use API route to access random endpoint in Backend Container.

It's not possible to set the tags using the AzureResourceManagerTemplateDeployment@3 task with the deploymentScope set to Resource Group, as documented here there are no parameters that do that. However, it is possible if you change the deploymentScope to Subscription but this will require you to refactor your template as a Subscription template. This will allow you to define the Resource Group inside the template, along with it's tags, rather than relying on the AzureResourceManagerTemplateDeployment@3 task to create it.

There's documentation on Subscription templates here but in short you will need to:

• add a resource to your template to define the Resource Group
• move the resources that are currently defined in the template to linked templates and replace them with Deployment resources that deploy those linked templates

If your ARM templates are stored in a public repo that should be straightforward, if not you'll need to make them accessible over https in some way. In the past I've used an Azure storage account and granted access to the files using a SAS token but there are many other ways to solve that problem.

1. web.xml must contain or : any other encoding would corrupt Unicode text content.
2. Edit web.xml in UTF-8; a programmer's editor like NotePad++ would do.
3. For hexadecimal do not forget the x: 台.

Column removal from non-empty table could lead to data loss.

It could be overriden with: /p:BlockOnPossibleDataLoss=false

DacDeployOptions.BlockOnPossibleDataLoss Property

Get or set boolean that specifies whether deployment should stop if the operation could cause data loss.

True to stop deployment if possible data loss if detected; otherwise, false. Default is true.

serviceName is not the recent representation. Changing it to service/name fixed problem.

Can you try to concat or format the parameters depending on what parameters you're using like this:

You could source the .env file. As the format KEY=value is compatible with how bash does its environment variables. So in your case, start.sh would be

I figured this out, there was a settings.xml file in wwwroot/site/deployments/ with the old branch details on it. If you delete settings.xml it will let go of that branch. You may not be able to delete the file though because its set to read-only permission and what you have to do is go into the configuration settings of your web app and change WEBSITE_RUN_FROM_PACKAGE value to 0, save that refresh the web app and then you will be able to delete the file. Then you can re-run the pipeline until your heart is content. :)