DrX | Rx doctor is in the house , curing all your ailments | iOS library

I would say just check that you are not in the corner - discard cases when percentOfWall is either exactly 0 or exactly 1

EDIT: to address the corners mentioned in the comments I have to explain why your implementation got stuck. It calculated penetration with all the walls and decreased position change by this penetration amount. In the corner, the object collided with both edges at once, and being repulsed from both at once stopped moving.

As you rightly noticed, in the corners your square gets inside the obstacle for one frame and then is pushed out on the consequent frame.

Alternative solutions, however, are more complicated and harder to debug, but here is a sketch for a couple of options:

• Limit the collisions to repulse from only one wall at a time and early exit your forEach loop. This is a simple solution which will work in this particular example but won't work in the general case, for example in the corner when you need to collide with 2 walls preventing you to go in both directions.
• Add a tiny circle in each of the corners and collide with it to avoid going inside. The normal is along the line between the center of the circle and the point of contact. That smooths the normal discontinuity you have in the corners and there is always a single normal along which the object is repulsed, continuously changing from one segment to the other.

Directing the "push" to outside each segment of the obstacle (which is what you are asking) wouldn't prevent stopping as on the corner (which is exactly the point you are concerned with), both walls will collide with your object and "outside" will be in the opposite directions. So it'll get stuck the same way as before and for exact same reason - normals will be not continuous.

I hope that helps

Could you please try following. Written and tested with shown examples.

First things first, you need to re-draw your shapes whenever slider changes since you are using noLoop(). To do that you can easily define an on change event like this:

Consider this:

You simply have to add the dist variable to the print command. Also, there are a few improvements that could bring to your code:

You need to make this filename "result.txt" dynamic. Currently it is overwriting content.

Perhaps like this:

So first, using @BuildStep only works during Quarkus augmentation phase: you need to be in an extension for it to work. It won't work in application code.

Second you need to delay the runtime initialization of the class holding the field so in your case, probably CollectionNumber?

So I would try to add:

Why complicate things using multiple levels of indirection using | and tee when you can just run a loop over the result of find as below

Considering that your actual Input_file is same as shown sample, if yes then following may help you.