templates | Stencil templates for SwiftGen | iOS library
kandi X-RAY | templates Summary
kandi X-RAY | templates Summary
This repository contains Stencil templates that are dedicated for being used with SwiftGen.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of templates
templates Key Features
templates Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on templates
QUESTION
I have run in to an odd problem after converting a bunch of my YAML pipelines to use templates for holding job logic as well as for defining my pipeline variables. The pipelines run perfectly fine, however I get a "Some recent issues detected related to pipeline trigger." warning at the top of the pipeline summary page and viewing details only states: "Configuring the trigger failed, edit and save the pipeline again."
The odd part here is that the pipeline works completely fine, including triggers. Nothing is broken and no further details are given about the supposed issue. I currently have YAML triggers overridden for the pipeline, but I did also define the same trigger in the YAML to see if that would help (it did not).
I'm looking for any ideas on what might be causing this or how I might be able to further troubleshoot it given the complete lack of detail that the error/warning provides. It's causing a lot of confusion among developers who think there might be a problem with their builds as a result of the warning.
Here is the main pipeline. the build repository is a shared repository for holding code that is used across multiple repos in the build system. dev.yaml contains dev environment specific variable values. Shared holds conditionally set variables based on the branch the pipeline is running on.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-17 at 14:58I think I may have figured out the problem. It appears that this is related to the use of conditionals in the variable setup. While the variables will be set in any valid trigger configuration, it appears that the proper values are not used during validation and that may have been causing the problem. Switching my conditional variables to first set a default value and then replace the value conditionally seems to have fixed the problem.
It would be nice if Microsoft would give a more useful error message here, something to the extent of the values not being found for a given variable, but adding defaults does seem to have fixed the problem.
QUESTION
I'm trying to connect my app with a firebase db, but I receive 4 error messages on app.module.ts:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-10 at 12:47You need to add "compat" like this
QUESTION
To allow std::string
construction from std::string_view
there is a template constructor
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-02 at 08:14The ambiguity is that std::string
and std::string_view
are both constructible from const char *
. That makes things like
QUESTION
I am trying to generate unique IDs from template template parameters. I tried this function
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-19 at 14:44There is no UB here. The template GetID
is instantiated once for each unique template argument, but GCC wrongly treats the alias templates as the template they alias itself, because they are equivalent here, as Davis Herring pointed out.
I think the simplest general solution is to pass the argument types in the alias templates through another alias template that makes them dependent names.
QUESTION
The message i am getting is "Adding the certificate to the trusted root certificate store failed with the following error" and then it says "Failed with an error."
And there is no other information!
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I have created new projects using the standard templates, and still the same problem without changing anything....
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-09 at 10:21in command prompt type where.exe dotnet if display like this:
C:\Program Files (x86)\dotnet\dotnet.exe
C:\Program Files\dotnet\dotnet.exe
you need move up C:\Program Files\dotnet\dotnet.exe in Start Menu - Edit the System Environment variables - Environment Variables - Path - Edit
after maybe need create certificate dotnet dev-certs https --trust
QUESTION
I would think that:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-13 at 05:41There's a simple question whose answer explains this:
Is the return value of make_reverse_iterator
a reverse_iterator
?
See, a reverse iterator is not just an iterator that runs backwards. It's a type. Or rather, it's a template which generates a family of types. And that template is expected to provide certain behavior; that behavior is what makes it a reverse iterator.
And this is behavior that is not required to be provided by a non-reverse_iterator
type. A reverse_iterator>
is not the same thing as I
. You can't get the base
of I
, for example.
If a user calls make_reverse_iterator
, it is their right to expect that they will get a reverse_iterator
, with all the powers and privileges provided by that template. To return anything else would be tantamount to lying to the user.
What you seem to want is make_iterator_go_backwards
: a function that returns some iterator type that goes backwards through the sequence. And that's a valid thing to want.
But that thing is not spelled make_reverse_iterator
. If you have a function called, make_some_type
, it should return some_type
.
QUESTION
Take a look at these two overloaded function templates:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-08 at 23:05The non language lawyer answer is that there is a tie breaker rule for exactly this case.
Understanding standard wording well enough to decode it would require a short book chapter. But when deduced T&&
vs T&
overloads are options being chosen between for an lvalue and everything else ties, the T&
wins.
This was done intentionally to (a) make universal references work, while (b) allowing you to overload on lvalue references if you want to handle them seperately.
The tie breaker comes from the template function overload "more specialized" ordering rules. The same reason why T*
is preferred over T
for pointers, even though both T=Foo*
and T=Foo
give the same function parameters. A secondary ordering on template parameters occurs, and the fact that T
can emulate T*
means T*
is more specialized (or rather not not, the wording in the standard is awkward). An extra rule stating that T&
beats T&&
for lvalues is in the same section.
QUESTION
Having the following structures:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-27 at 21:43Well, since you explicitly say macros may be ok:
QUESTION
It is well known that ordinary functions that differ only in their return type cannot be overloaded in C++.
But this limitation does not hold for overloaded function templates, for example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-30 at 08:42Why does the language make such exception for the templates?
You mean this?
signature [defns.signature.templ]
⟨function template⟩ name, parameter-type-list, enclosing namespace (if any), return type, template-head, and trailing requires-clause (if any)
Yes, the return type is there. It's what always made possible things like
QUESTION
The 2nd edition of C++ Templates - The Complete Guide features the following code at page 435
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-27 at 17:30Your demo uses void begin() const;
to test the following
... instead does add the requirement that the return type of the call is complete ...
But a void
return type is not the same as an incomplete return type. For that you could try
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install templates
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page