Buffer | Swift μ-framework for efficient array diffs | iOS library

select() can set a timeout for the connection part.

Yes, but only if you put the socket into non-blocking mode before calling connect(), so that connect() exits immediately and then the code can use select() to wait for the socket to report when the connect operation has finished. But the code shown is not doing that.

setsockopt() with timeval can timeout the receiving portion of the code

Yes, though select() can also be used to timeout a read operation, as well. Simply call select() first, and then call recv() only if select() reports that the socket is readable (has pending data to read).

Try something like this:

You are not measuring the elapsed time correctly:

1. total_send_time measures the duration of the spawn() call, but as the actual task is executed asynchronously, start_in.elapsed() does not give you any information about how much time the task actually takes.

2. The ran in time, as measured by start.elapsed() is also not useful at all. As you are using blocking sleep operation, you are just measuring how much time your app has spent in the std::thread::sleep()

3. Last but not least, your time_to_sleep calculation is completely incorrect, because of the issue mentioned in point 1.

No, this will not work, you're using GetBufferPointer which is a naked pointer to memory owned by FlatBufferBuilder, which will be deallocated upon leaving the function.

Like the docs you quote say, you must use ReleaseBufferPointer instead. Or make a copy, though that is obviously less efficient.

Better yet to structure your code such that the caller owns FlatBufferBuilder and its passed as an argument.

How about using TaggedOutput.

I had the same problem, man. I want to transplant tflite to the development board of CEVA. There is no problem in compiling. In the process of running, there is also an error in AddBuiltin(full_connect). At present, the only possible situation I guess is that some devices can not support tflite.

Those are stray bytes like *, %, etc. prefixed with some of the lines.

The stray bytes appear to be a custom stream multiplexing protocol, allowing STDOUT and STDERR to be sent down the same connection.

Using stdcopy.StdCopy() interprets these custom headers and those stray characters are avoided by removing the protocol header for each piece of data.

Refer: https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/master/pkg/stdcopy/stdcopy.go#L42

As Bhargav Rao deleted my previous answer, I will add a new one.

Ok, the signature container is embedded correctly.

But there are issues with the signature container itself:

• Both in the SignedData.digestAlgorithms collection and in the SignerInfo.digestAlgorithm value you have used the OID of SHA1withRSA, but that is a full signature algorithm, not the mere digest algorithm SHA1 expected there.

• Then the SHA1 hash of the signed bytes is BB78A402F7A537A34D6892B83881266501A691A8 but the hash you signed is 90E28B8A0D8E48691DAFE2BA10A4761FFFDCCD3D. This might be because you hash buffer2 and

  buffer2 has empty contents data (/Contents <>)

  The hex string delimiters '<' and '>' also belong to the contents value and, therefore, must also be removed in buffer2.

Furthermore, your signature is very weak:

• It uses SHA1 as hash algorithm. SHA1 meanwhile has been recognized as too weak a hash algorithm for document signatures.
• It doesn't use signed attributes, neither the ESS signing certificate nor the algorithm identifier protection attribute. Many validation policies require such special attributes.