Shock | A HTTP mocking framework written in Swift | Mock library

The question still really isn't clear, but if you want to use that code in a function node then I suggest the following:

Put that code into the "On Start" tab of the function node, but change the first line to the following:

You need to return something out of this functions, you can either use return or just call the name of what you want at the last line

The issue is because left is the distance between the element and the left edge of the screen, and right is the distance between the element and the right edge of the screen.

Applying right after left does not move the element back to its original location - it's an entirely separate value.

To achieve what you require simply set left back to its original value. In this example, that's 8px:

State is a complete subset of Partial, that is why State | Partial == Partial.

The only way you can coerce the Partial into State is by explicit setting Required or, using type-fest and setting SetRequired, "foo" | "bar"> (but this one implies that you can extract the keys from somewhere).

The following code:

To give a bit more explanation as to why traverse is slower: traverse f xs has has type State [()] and that [()] (list of unit tuples) is built up during the summation. This prevents further optimizations and would cause a memory leak if you were not using lazy state.

Update: I think GHC should have been able to notice that that list of unit tuples is never used, so I opened a GHC issue.

In both cases, To get the best performance we want to combine (or fuse) the summation with the enumeration [1..x] into a tight recursive loop which simply increments and adds until it reaches x. The resulting code would look something like this:

You must not change array value in its loop.

The following provides an overview (leaving out lots of gory details):

Two key components for display of text on the Internet are (i) character encoding and (ii) fonts.

Character encoding is a scheme by which characters, such as the Latin capital letter "A", are assigned a representation as a byte sequence. Many different character encoding schemes have been devised in the past. Today, what is almost ubiquitously used on the Internet is Unicode. Unicode assigns each character to a code point, which is an integer value; e.g., Unicode assigns LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A to the code point 65, or 41 in hexadecimal. By convention, Unicode code points are referred to using four to six hex digits with "U+" as a prefix. So, LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A is assigned to U+0041.

Fonts provide the graphical data used to display text. There have been various font formats created over the years. Today, what is ubiquitously used on the Internet are fonts that follow the OpenType spec (which is an extension of the TrueType font format created back around 1991).

What you see presented on the screen are glyphs. An OpenType font contains data for the glyphs, and also a table that maps Unicode code points to corresponding glyphs. More precisely, the character-to-glyph mapping (or 'cmap') table maps Unicode code points to glyph IDs. The code points are defined by Unicode; the glyph IDs are a font-internal implementation detail, and are used to look up the glyph descriptions and related data in other tables.

Glyphs in an OpenType font can be defined as bitmaps, or (far more common) as vector outlines (Bezier curves). There is an assumed coordinate grid for the glyph descriptions. The vector outlines, then, are defined as an ordered list of coordinate pairs for Bezier curve control points. When text is displayed, the vector outline is scaled onto a display grid, based on the requested text size (e.g., 10 point) and pixel sizing on the display. A rasterizer reads the control point data in the font, scales as required for the display grid, and generates a bitmap that is put onto the screen at an appropriate position.

One extra detail about displaying the rasterized bitmap: most operating systems or apps will use some kind of filtering to give glyphs a smoother and more legible appearance. For example, a grayscale anti-alias filter will set display pixels at the edges of glyphs to a gray level, rather than pure black or pure white, to make edges appear smoother when the scaled outline doesn't align exactly to the physical pixel boundaries—which is most of the time.

I mentioned "at an appropriate position". The font has metric (positioning) information for the font as a whole and for each glyph.

The font-wide metrics will include a recommended line-to-line distance for lines of text, and the placement of the baseline within each line. These metrics are expressed in the units of the font's glyph design grid; the baseline corresponds to y=0 within the grid. To start a line, the (0,0) design grid position is aligned to where the baseline meets the edge of a text container within the page layout, and the first glyph is positioned.

The font also has glyph metrics. One of the glyph metrics is an advance width for each given glyph. So, when the app is drawing a line of text, it has a starting "pen position" at the start of the line, as described above. It then places the first glyph on the line accordingly, and advances the pen position by the amount of that first glyph's advance width. It then places the second glyph using the new pen position, and advances again. And so on as glyphs are placed along the line.

There are (naturally) more complexities in laying out lines of text. What I described above is sufficient for English text displayed in a basic text editor. More generally, display of a line of text can involve substitution of the default glyphs with certain alternate glyphs; this is needed, for example, when displaying Arabic text so that characters appear cursively connected. OpenType fonts contain a "glyph substitution" (or 'GSUB') table that provides details for glyph substitution actions. In addition, the positioning of glyphs can be adjusted for various reasons; for example, to position a diacritic glyph correctly over a letter. OpenType fonts contain a "glyph positioning" ('GPOS') table that provides the position adjustment data. Operating system platforms and browsers today support all of this functionality so that Unicode-encoded text for many different languages can be displayed using OpenType fonts.

Addendum on glyph scaling:

Within the font, a grid is set up with a certain number of units per em. This is set by the font designer. For example, the designer might specify 1000 units per em, or 2048 units per em. The glyphs in the font and all the metric values—glyph advance width, default line-to-line distinance, etc.—are all set in font design grid units.

How does the em relate to what content authors set? In a word processing app, you typically set text size in points. In the printing world, a point is a well defined unit for length, approximately but not quite 1/72 of an inch. In digital typography, points are defined as exactly 1/72 of an inch. Now, in a word processor, when you set text size to, say, 12 points, that really means 12 points per em.

So, for example, suppose a font is designed using 1000 design units per em. And suppose a particular glyph is exactly 1 em wide (e.g., an em dash); in terms of the design grid units, it will be exactly 1000 units wide. Now, suppose the text size is set to 36 points. That means 36 points per em, and 36 points = 1/2", so the glyph will print exactly 1/2" wide.

When the text is rasterized, it's done for a specific target device, that has a certain pixel density. A desktop display might have a pixel (or dot) density of 96 dpi; a printer might have a pixel density of 1200 dpi. Those are relative to inches, but from inches you can get to points, and for a given text size, you can get to ems. You end up with a certain number of pixels per em based on the device and the text size. So, the rasterizer takes the glyph outline defined in font design units per em, and scales it up or down for the given number of pixels per em.

For example, suppose a font is designed using 1000 units per em, and a printer is 1000 dpi. If text is set to 72 points, that's 1" per em, and the font design units will exactly match the printer dots. If the text is set to 12 points, then the rasterizer will scale down so that there are 6 font design units per printer dot.

At that point, the details in the glyph outline might not align to whole units in the device grid. The rasterizer needs to decide which pixels/dots get ink and which do not. The font can include "hints" that affect the rasterizer behaviour. The hints might ensure that certain font details stay aligned, or the hints might be instructions to move a Bezier control point by a certain amount based on the current pixels-per-em.

For more details, see Digitizing Letterform Designs and Font Engine from Apple's TrueType Reference Manual, which goes into lots of detail.

i is an element of tested_tabela, because of that, change

I was really skeptical about the results you got, so I gave it a try with the exact same Python code and main Java method (that uses https) as yours.
Here is the Java run method that reads the entire JSON content of the response: