Mockit | A simple mocking framework for Swift | Mock library
kandi X-RAY | Mockit Summary
kandi X-RAY | Mockit Summary
Mockit is a Tasty mocking framework for unit tests in Swift 5.0. It's at an early stage of development, but its current features are almost completely usable. Mockit is a mocking framework that tastes brilliant. It lets you write beautiful tests with a clean & simple API. Tests written using Mockit are very readable and they produce clean verification errors. It's inspired by the famous mocking framework for Java - Mockito.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Mockit
Mockit Key Features
Mockit Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Mockit
QUESTION
everyone.
I was trying to execute " mvn clean test " to verify a simple maven project which was generated by "mvn archetype:generate".I just to want learning how to write unit test.But I got a exception , after a long time debug and trying , I don't know how to continue,please give me some advice. Because I don't know what's wrong, so I will try to give as much info as I can.
os:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-08 at 05:42This looks similar to https://github.com/raphw/byte-buddy/issues/1001. Please double check if there is any different tools.jar located in the application classpath
QUESTION
I am using Junit 3.8.1 and updated Jmokit to 1.49
I have a project in which existing tests present with MockUp. Having private methods mocked. After updating Jmockit jar to 1.49 version getting error as follows
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-06 at 06:34Earlier versions of JMockit allowed mocking private methods, and honestly, I thought it was a brilliant differentiator with other mocking-frameworks. Sadly, more recent versions have eliminated the ability to mock privates - became a warning in 1.45 and an exception in 1.47.
There is no real official explanation, although supposition is that private methods should be so simple they do not need testing/mocking. By extension, if you are trying to access it for purposes of testing, then it should not be private. People (other than you) would likely want to also alter the behavior, and that your need to access it for test purposes is strongly suggesting the method ought to be accessible. Make it protected or package-private. FWIW, there are annotations like "@VisibleForTesting" that can be used to help indicate the intent.
So you know, 1.47 also removed the "Deencapsulation" mechanism which was one of my favorite tools for inspecting/setting private data. Painful at the time I had to convert, because it littered my test code, but in hind sight, @Tested/@Injectable (the replacement) is way cleaner. As the maintainer indicates, JMockit is not intended as a way to get at privates, there are other frameworks that do that and no sense in doing the job that they do better. I switched over to Apache's commons-lang3 (FieldUtils/MethodUtils/etc), but other frameworks exist
QUESTION
I'm using the Go Mockery package, and I want the function Next
to do some actions before returning. However, when I do this:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-08 at 22:09Return
function is used to return values on call of the mocked function. You can't change the signature of the mocked function.
Here you're returning func(*types.Query) bool
(function that returns boolean) instead of bool
, as the error message say.
You can have the function to make some computation and then return the value. You just have to add ()
(or whatever arguments your function accepts) after function definition to invoke it and you'll be good to go.
This works:
QUESTION
I'm looking for a way to log calls to all methods in java.nio.ByteBuffer
.
I just want to know which methods are being called.
This was possible with JMockit, but as of version 1.47 some infinitely wise individual decided to remove support of private methods & version 1.46 doesn't work too well with JDK 9 and later.
Can anyone suggest a tool? It doesn't necessarily need to be a Unit-Test framework, but it should work in Eclipse.
I need at least support for JDK 11 (preferably JDK 13)
Just for the record, here's the code that works with JMockit 1.46 & JDK 1.8:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-17 at 03:37If this is for the purpose of learning or analysis, why don't you just use a debugger? I am going to show you an example in IntelliJ IDEA:
Given this code somewhere in your main
method or test:
QUESTION
Usually, I would run my test classes by right clicking the class -> Run As -> JUnit Test. But I get errors if the class is annotated with @RunWith
For example, for a test class with the following structure:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-01 at 18:25This is something you can configure in the "Run Configuration". Right after failing to run the test class, bring up the "Run Configurations" dialog (multiple ways to get there), the one you just ran should be selected. Click on the "Arguments" tab, put the required "javaagent" command-line arguments into that field and store them.
If you don't like having to edit this for every test class, you might consider changing your mocking technology. Mockito has no need for something like this.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install Mockit
Download and drop /Mockit folder in your project.
Congratulations!
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page