Instantiate | Type-safe and constructor injectable InterfaceBuilder | iOS library

The problem is simple: QWidgets are hidden by default so isVisible() will return false, the solution is to invoke the show() method in init() to make it visible:

You should use constructor injection. And because you already injection Llaveompo you don't need to have @Value for the secret.

Three things come immediate to mind.

The first is nothing to do with your question but CouponRepository should not have its own member for _couponApiDBContext it has access to the base class TContext - that's the whole point of having it generic in the first place.

The second is that you are specializing IRepository with RedeemCoupon method in ICouponRepository - so you have zero chance of registering an open generic type and just expecting DI to know what actual interface you're after.

You're left with removing this AddTransient(typeof(IRepository<>), typeof(Repository<,>)) - it's pointless as DI cannot instantiate an abstract class anyway, and that is the root cause of your error message and you should register AddTransient() and request ICouponRepository where you need it - you cant ask for IRepository as that will not have your RedeemCoupon method which I assume you need.

In Unity, Input.MousePosition is measured in terms of pixels on your screen. Let's say you have a 1080p monitor - 1920 x 1080 - which is pretty common these days, that means Input.MousePosition will be in the following range when your game is fullscreen:

• x: 0 to 1919
• y: 0 to 1079

The actual world units - the units as seen in your scene - don't matter at all and can be basically anything.

Another thing of note is that your gameworld is 3D and the physical screen is 2D. Assuming your camera is looking into open space in your world, a single pixel on the screen is represented by an infinite line in the 3D world. This line is called a ray, and you can turn a 2D screen position into a ray via Camera.ScreenPointToRay, and then find what 3D objects that line intersects with via a Physics.Raycast.

Simply register two transits callbacks (i.e. one per vehicle type)

Then use the overload of AddDimension() to pass an array of registered transit callback index.

e.G. Mizux/vrp_multiple_transit.py

No, the app doesn't re-run. Reloading the page means the page itself gets re-rendered. So, if you make some local changes on the web-page which isn't persistent - means which isn't stored in some Database those changes will not persist and will not be reflected after you reload your page.

You need to add the seconds of cooldown you want on the spawner when you declare it too, E.G spawnCooldown = Time.time + coolDownPeriodInSeconds;

You also need to set spawnCooldown to be a float, which stores numbers. Currently you have stored it as a bool, which only stores true or false values, and therefore cannot be compared to Time.time further in the code.

Lastly you are missing the closing } character in the if block

What is happening currently is you are doing the following:

1. Setting spawn Cooldown to be the current Time
2. For every frame after that, checking if the new current time is greater than the old time you set as spawnCooldown. Since it always is, the code will then run through the spawn script.

If you change it to

You can get around the problems of subclassing dict by subclassing collections.UserDict instead. As the docs say:

Class that simulates a dictionary. The instance’s contents are kept in a regular dictionary, which is accessible via the data attribute of UserDict instances. If initialdata is provided, data is initialized with its contents; note that a reference to initialdata will not be kept, allowing it be used for other purposes.

Essentially, it's a thin regular-class wrapper around a dict. You should be able to use it with multiple inheritance as an abstract base class, as you do with AbstractRememberingDict.

So the reason for the error message is that instance is a local variable in your instantiate function. Because you aren't moving its ownership to the return value, it will be dropped at the end of the function.

But then if it gets dropped, any reference to it would be invalid. That's why Rust doesn't let you return something holding a reference to the local variable.

First, your struct is redundant, because PhysicalDevice already holds a reference for the instance. Even without the local variable problem, I think you'd run into an ownership problem.

Second, let's say you rewrite and get rid of your InstanceInfo struct and instead you want to just return a PhysicalDevice<'static>. Well if that's what you promise to the compiler, then you have to make sure that the instance you create will live for as long as the program lives.

You can do that either by having instance be a static variable of your module, or by creating it at the very beginning of the program and then simply pass a reference ot it around.

For example