wretch | tiny wrapper built around fetch with an intuitive syntax | HTTP library
kandi X-RAY | wretch Summary
kandi X-RAY | wretch Summary
A tiny wrapper built around fetch with an intuitive syntax. :candy:
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of wretch
wretch Key Features
wretch Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on wretch
QUESTION
Background of the Problem:
I am building a React/Redux app that uses redux-thunk and wretch (a fetch wrapper) to handle asynchronous requests.
I have a few search actions that can vary significantly in their load times, causing undesirable behavior.
I have looked into using AbortController(), but it's either cancelling all my requests outright, or failing to cancel the previous request.
example problem:
- Request a search for "JOHN", then request a search for "JOHNSON".
- Results for "JOHNSON" return first, and then results for "JOHN" return later and overwrite the "JOHNSON" results.
Goal:
Initiating a request should abort previous pending requests.
example desired behavior:
- Request a search for "JOHN", then request a search for "JOHNSON".
- Upon initiating the request for "JOHNSON", the pending request for "JOHN" is aborted.
Code:
actions.js
The fetchData action gets called via an onClick or by other functions.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-21 at 16:02I feel pretty silly right now, but this is what it took to get it working.
Solution Steps:
- Set an AbortController to the initialState of the reducer
reducer.js
QUESTION
I have a react component using Hooks where I click a button to make API calls to the Hacker News API and push the results into an array. Then I set the state of "stories" to be that array full of stories.
I have a second function fired off by a button which console logs the state of "stories" and console.log's a .map returning each stories title. All of this works just fine.
If I attempt to use a .map in the return of the component it does not work. If I initalize the state of "stories" to be ["test", "test1", "test2"]
the .map works but as soon as I hit my button to set the state to be the array of stories the .map stops working. No error messages just the content goes away.
Here is where I import React and set the initial state, I've used Axios, Fetch and Wretch to make the API calls, all with the same results:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Oct-04 at 20:44Your data fetching look a little messy, you know you can use Promise.all instead of pushing to an array and looping.
I have added a check to see if the component is still mounted before setting state.
QUESTION
I have 2 pre tags. The first one contains guitar chords which must be above the the lyrics beneath exactly. The 2nd pre tag contains the lyrics. It looks something like this when rendered on screen. (Not showing exact markup, this is just to demo the issue)
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jun-21 at 02:31You might want to play with some of the specific values to make it look a little better, but here's one basic technique that you could use:
QUESTION
Let's say I wan't to update a nickName of Person entity, with rule that this nickName is used by up to 5 other Persons. How should I do it?
Should I do validation in domain service, before calling an update?
Or is it better to pass a personRepository into PersonEntity.update(...) method, and do the search and validation inside entity update method?
Additional clarification:
@plalx idea of creating additional entity for executing this rule is clever.
When I am reading about DDD I often read that passing a repository into entity is not recomended (if not evil). That's why I try to find an example where we need a repository or some other service in entity). I actually don't know if only passing repository is bad and service is ok, or passing a service into entity is similarily discouraged.
Let's assume that this rule is not so hard and important business rule, and we can have multiple similar rules (so many, that creating an additional entity for each rule for each attribute we want to validate is a little bit overengineered). Lets assume we can allow 6 or 7 same nicknames in case of concurrent update (we only want to limit them to reasonably small number) and check of
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Apr-06 at 23:30Or is it better to pass a personRepository into PersonEntity.update(...) method, and do the search and validation inside entity update method?
That wouldn't prevent the rule from being violated through concurrency though, since as soon as you checked personRepo.usageCountOfNickname(nickname) <= 5
it could have changed right after.
If you want strong consistency, you could introduce a NicknameUsage
aggregate root to enforce that policy. You would be modifying more than 1 AR in a transaction, but that's probably not a big deal since it's very unlikely that there will be a lot of contention on the same nicknames anyway, right?
E.g.
QUESTION
I am trying to create a simple parser in Java using JFlex and Jacc. For testing, I wrote a simple lexer-parser combo to recognize strings and numbers. I managed to connect the lexer and the parser but can not handle new line characters (ASCII 10) sent from System.io.
Here is lexer.flex
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Feb-25 at 20:17So when I enter "a b c" the parser prints "a", "b" and then the wretched ASCII 10. Next I type "1 2 3 4" and only then the parser prints "c" etc. I am on Linux / Java 9.
That's to be expected. Your parser prints only the semantic values sim
symbols, and only when it reduces them to or into an inp
. It will not perform such a reduction without a lookahead token, notwithstanding the fact that in your particular parser, the choice is always to reduce when the symbol at the end of the queue is a sim
. But your lexer prints the newline message as soon as the newline is scanned in the process of obtaining such a lookahead token, before the reduction that causes the preceding semantic value to be printed.
If newlines are significant to your grammar, then your lexer should emit tokens for them instead of operating on them directly, and your grammar should take those tokens into account. For example:
QUESTION
First of all, excuse me for my (sometimes) bad English, I'm french. I'm actually working on a role game project. The goal is to create a little macOS software (a generator) using Swift and Xcode that can create a potion (an effect associated with a potency) (like : "Fortify Speed 7/10") from multiple parameters. The app allows the user to enter two parameters : ingredients (selected in pop-up menus) and a dice roll (put in a text field). If those two (or more) ingredients have an effect in common, the soft makes an addition of the value of both effects and return this : ""effect in common" + (value of the 1st ingredient effect + value of 2nd ingredient effect)". The result can change during the operation depending on the dice roll, but it doesn't matter here. Here is an exemple to understand what I'm saying :
1st ingredient : "Cat's Claw Bark" -> Resist Lightning (4/10); Resist Psychic (3/10); Acid Damage (3/10); Fear (3/10); Invisibility (1/10). || 2nd ingredient : "Grape Holly" -> Cure Disease (5/10); Resist Cold (4/10); Heighten Medicine (4/10; Resist Lightning (3/10); Force Damage (2/10.
Because both ingredients have an effect in common (Resist Lightning), the soft returns that effect with an addition of the potency of the two effects. So it returns : "Resist Lightning (7/10)"
Here is my first question : How can I convert this into Swift code ? I've tried many ways but nothing useful. I tried to use arrays, dictionaries, arrays into dictionaries, but I'm still facing the same problem : How can I attribute multiple parameters (effects in this case) and types (String for the name of the effect and Int for its potency) to an instance ? (If it's the right question). My second question is : How can I compare keys (not values) of a dictionary to match a result ?
Maybe like this, using a dictionary, but I'll need to display in the result not only the value of the key in the dictionary, but the key itself. Also, I'll need to compare the keys, not the values :
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Dec-20 at 14:21Problem solved ! The solution was so obvious that I didn't think about it directly, the for-in loops ! I hope this will help anybody facing the same issue. Here is the corresponding code :
QUESTION
So I am in a JavaScript/Jquery class and for my current assignment I need to insert a back to top link after the 4th paragraph within an article. I have seem that this is a way to select a specific paragraph:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jun-02 at 06:34You need to use insertAfter("article.chapter p:eq(3)")
so that the fourth p
is selected. Notice the pseudo class :eq(3)
inside insertAfter
which will select only the fourth paragraph from the list of paragraphs.
Also, if you want the link after each four paragraph then you need to loop through the paragraphs and set the :eq()
dynamically.
QUESTION
There are two examples on the w3.org's blockquote
-page:
ANSWER
Answered 2018-Feb-06 at 13:39Based on the following facts:
- The non-normative examples in the W3C spec seem to contradict one another, as you've seen.
- The W3C spec doesn't contain any normative text suggesting that either option is inappropriate. One of the examples claims that a citation is not a caption, but since it's not normative, you're well within your right to disagree.
- From this WHATWG issue, the living spec editor as well as a W3C CSSWG (i.e. not HTML WG) member think the difference doesn't matter in practice, though the former seems to lean towards
figcaption
. - In practice, most authors place attribution information in
figcaption
anyway, with no apparent repercussions.
... the conclusion seems to be that there is no meaningful or practical difference between the two, and that whichever you choose to use is a matter of personal preference.
Having said that, if you're still unable to decide, figcaption
is more compatible with both specifications, not in terms of conformance (since footer
and figcaption
are equally conforming), but in terms of how they both describe its role and usage, especially with relation to the figure
element (generally, you expect text associated with a figure to be its caption). Either way, what's most important are the cite
elements, since ultimately they're the ones conveying attribution semantics, not their container element.
QUESTION
I'm trying to build a naive bayes based classifier for 1000 positive+negative labled IMDB reviews (txt_sentoken) and weka API for Java.
As I wasn't aware of StringToWordVector
, which basically provides a BagOfWords model that reaches an 80% accuracy, so I did the vocabulary building and vector creation myself, with an accuracy of only 75% :(
Now I'm wondering why my solution is performing so much worse.
1) From my 2000 reviews, I build the BagOfWords:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Dec-28 at 07:18Reading through Weka's StringToWordVector
documentation, there seem to be a couple of implementation details different than yours. Here are the top two, based on how likely they are to be the reason for the performance difference you see, in my opinion:
- It seems that by default, the resulting vector is boolean (i.e. noting the existence of a word, rather than number of occurrences)
- If the class attribute is set before vectorizing the text, a separate dictionary is built for each class, then all dictionaries are merged.
While any of them (or other, more minor differences) could be the culprit, my bet is on the second point.
The built-in class allows setting and unsetting each of these options; you could try re-running the 80% version using StringToWordVector
with the -C option to use number of occurences rather then a boolean value, and with -O, to use a single dictionary across both classes.
This should allow you to verify whether any of these is indeed the culprit.
EDIT: Regarding the first point, i.e. counting occurences vs. noting word existence (also called Bernoulli and multinomial models), there were several academic papers at the 90s which looked into the differences, e.g. here and here. While usually the multinomial model works better, there are also opposite cases, depending on corpus and classification problem.
QUESTION
i am attempting to restore a backup database file using WiX, and the database is created but none of the tables and data are restored. it seems as though it is only creating the database and doing nothing else. not sure if this is WiX related or has something to do with MSSQL usage. here is the WiX XML:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Nov-14 at 17:12rather than trying to refer to the wix name of the database file, i used the following:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install wretch
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page