cheatsheets | Cheat sheets provided by encore.dev | Learning library
kandi X-RAY | cheatsheets Summary
kandi X-RAY | cheatsheets Summary
This repository hosts cheat sheets maintained by the team behind encore.dev.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of cheatsheets
cheatsheets Key Features
cheatsheets Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on cheatsheets
QUESTION
Currently am using JDK 1.8. Need to know what is jaxp version available. To avoid sonar violation , trying set below properties , resulting in "org.xml.sax.SAXNotRecognizedException: Property 'http://javax.xml.XMLConstants/property/accessExternalDTD' is not recognized." SchemaFactory schemaFactory = SchemaFactory.newInstance(XMLConstants.W3C_XML_SCHEMA_NS_URI); schemaFactory.setProperty(XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_DTD, ""); schemaFactory.setProperty(XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_SCHEMA, ""); referring below https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/XML_External_Entity_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html#schemafactory also checked many blogs stating jaxp version 1.5 above should support is the information found . Any suggesting will help me to debug more .
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-03 at 23:07There is no such thing as a "javax version". You have misread the page you linked to. What it actually says is:
Note: Use of the following
XMLConstants
requires JAXP 1.5, which was added to Java in 7u40 and Java 8:
JAXP != javax
JAXP 1.5 actually refers to a specification. And as stated in the text I just quoted, Java 8 supports the relevant features of the JAXP 1.5 specification.
So if you want to use the constants listed in the OWASP cheatsheet, you need to build your code for Java 7u40 or Java 8 or later, and run it on a JVM that provides a JAXP 1.5 or later implementation.
(In fact Java 8 supports JAXP 1.6 ... according to https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/xml/jaxp/index.html)
If you are getting runtime errors saying that the those properties are not supported, that implies that you have configured your application to use an XML implementation (provider) that doesn't support JAXP 1.5. But you haven't said anything about that ...
It is possible that these Q&As are relevant:
QUESTION
I've started playing with XSS to better improve my security posture at work. I've been able to successfully exploit a reflected XSS attack using a redirected POST form, but I can't seem to remove the extraneous characters displayed on the page.
I've checked:
How to load javascript on another webpage through XSS?
But none of the suggestions seem to work for me.
My exploit is a basic form, exploiting a PHP server side script I've configured echoing $_POST['username']
into the value attribute:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-03 at 22:27I eventually figured it out after hours of trial and error. The idea is to close the dangling tag with a separate tag:
So the previous payload was:
QUESTION
What is the meaning of context in the passage below?
The first rule is to deny all - don't put untrusted data into your HTML document unless it is within one of the slots defined in Rule #1 through Rule #5. The reason for Rule #0 is that there are so many strange contexts within HTML that the list of encoding rules gets very complicated. We can't think of any good reason to put untrusted data in these contexts. This includes "nested contexts" like a URL inside a JavaScript -- the encoding rules for those locations are tricky and dangerous.
If you insist on putting untrusted data into nested contexts, please do a lot of cross-browser testing and let us know what you find out.
This passage is taken from Cross Site Scripting Prevention - OWASP Cheat Sheet Series.At there,you can find rule #0 through rule #5.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-31 at 06:46"Contexts" here refers to basically places where text can go in an HTML document. The OWASP XSS Prevention guide you're referencing aims to educate developers on how to safely place untrusted data in HTML.
Because HTML can do a lot of different stuff, it's important to understand exactly where your untrusted data is going so you can understand the risks and specific mitigation strategies.
The link you provided identifies several contexts:
QUESTION
Reading this XSS cheat sheet, I noticed a special usage I have never seen:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-23 at 04:47It's just an attribute on the element. It doesn't have any meaning by itself, so it may be present simply as a red herring.
Prettified, the code is:
QUESTION
I have a pandas DataFrame similar to this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-20 at 08:49Use to_dict
:
QUESTION
I am trying to create a local environment for the ML Studio using the Python SDK, following
this official cheatsheet. The result should be a conda-like environment that can be used for local testing. However, I am running into an error when importing the Numpy package with the add_conda_package()
method of the CondaDependencies()
class. Where I've tried not specifying, as well as specifying package versions, like:
add_conda_package('numpy')
or add_conda_package('numpy=1.21.2')
, but it does not seem to make a difference.
Numpy's error message is extensive, and I've tried many of the suggestions, without success nonetheless. I'm grateful for any tips on what might resolve my issues!
Full code ...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-24 at 08:37I was finally able to resolve the issue by using the pip method instead of the conda method:
add_pip_package('numpy')
instead of add_conda_package('numpy')
I can imagine this being the reason for other packages as well.
QUESTION
From the OWASP's website https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Content_Security_Policy_Cheat_Sheet.html:
Send a Content-Security-Policy HTTP response header from your web server.
Content-Security-Policy: ...
Using a header is the preferred way and supports the full CSP feature set. Send it in all HTTP responses, not just the index page.
I don't understand how that could be true as it is possible to set the Content-Security-Policy by using a meta tag in the HTML. I also don't see how the policy can apply to anything else but HTML pages.
Does anyone have idea why that statement above was made and if it is safe to only send HTTP header Content-Security-Policy
for text/html
responses?
By the way, the policy is too big and I would like to sent as fewer bytes as possible.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-28 at 12:46This is still something that’s not formally specified and there ai still some debate on this: https://github.com/w3c/webappsec/issues/520
In general there’s two arguments here:
On the one hand some other file types (XML, PDF, perhaps even SVGs) could benefit from CSP and any resource could become the page by right clicking and opening in a separate tab.
On the other hand CSPs can get quite big and are usually written for HTML pages. So a bit wasteful to send on other resources and most of it won’t be relevant.
The right answer (as suggested by above) is probably to have a reduced, and very strict, CSP for all non-HTML responses.
But I think for most people having it on the HTML only will be good enough and bring most of the benefits of CSP. Then again CSP is an advanced technique so if going as far as that, then why not do it properly?
QUESTION
Problem
I'm using Apache FOP to produce a PDF from an XML and XSL file. The XML file is downloaded from an external site, not generated by me, so any manipulation of it would need to be scripted. It contains tags that contain anchor HTML tags inside of them intended to be named hyperlinks, but the xsl:value-of tag seems to somehow strip any functionality of anchor tags inside of the string itself and leaves the PDF report to have the display text of the anchor, but not the hyperlink, leading to "click here" labels that aren't actually clickable with no way to tell what the URL was supposed to be because the href tag is completely gone.
XML (snippet)
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-14 at 08:18The xsl:value-of
instruction does exactly what you are describing: it extracts the string value of an element, dropping all internal markup.
To retain the existing markup unchanged, use the xsl:copy-of
instruction.
To process the internal markup, turning it into something else, use the xsl:apply-templates
instruction, with appropriate template rules to handle the descendant elements encountered.
Finally, please don't use w3schools as your primary learning resource. It's handy as a quick reference when you understand the concepts of the language and need a reminder of the details. It's not a good way of learning the concepts initially. It's also not a good place to go once you're beyond the basics and need a detailed explanation of edge cases (it tends to simplify).
Note: you say "I can't find anything that explicitly says that xsl:value-of invalidates anchor tags inside of the string it returns". w3schools says "The xsl:value-of element extracts the value of a selected node." But (typically) it doesn't say what it means to "extract the value". If you go to the XSLT 1.0 specification, however (https://www.w3.org/TR/xslt-10/#value-of) it's very clear: "The xsl:value-of
element is instantiated to create a text node in the result tree. The required select
attribute is an expression; this expression is evaluated and the resulting object is converted to a string as if by a call to the string function. The string specifies the string-value of the created text node." The fact that xsl:value-of
creates a text node means (if you've understood the concept of the tree model) that it can't possibly retain any descendant node structure.
QUESTION
I'm trying to build a query with Arel with Rails 6 API. I've found this howto that looks great but I'm getting errors. Though the examples were created many years ago and based on few searches, things looks the same. I have a simple module class:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-01 at 20:35You need to tell Arel what you want to select:
QUESTION
I am wondering how I can create a docs site like create-react-app or react typescript cheatsheets. I am imaging they are using the same package or setup, I just want to know what they are using. Apologies if the answer is too obvious!
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-01 at 08:33After some investigation I discovered they are using docusaurus.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install cheatsheets
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page