ng-mocks | Angular testing library for mocking components | Mock library
kandi X-RAY | ng-mocks Summary
kandi X-RAY | ng-mocks Summary
Global configuration for mocks in src/test.ts. In case of jest, src/setup-jest.ts / src/test-setup.ts should be used. An example of a spec for a profile edit component.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of ng-mocks
ng-mocks Key Features
ng-mocks Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on ng-mocks
QUESTION
i have to update an angular 7.x project to angular 8.2.0, so i've read online of ng update
.
I have a global angular version equal to my update target version (8.2.0) but ng update forces me to update to the latest version.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-30 at 11:59That is because when you do ng update
you are not defining a specific version.
You should use something like ng update @angular/core@10 @angular/cli@10
etc...
Its not recommended to go from Angular 7 to Angular 13 in a single update, instead you should go version by version like:
- Angular 7 -> Angular 8,
- Angular 8 -> Angular 9.1
Follow this Angular Update Guide and you should be fine, at the bottom you have specific instructions you should do before each update https://update.angular.io/
QUESTION
In an Angular environment, how can I very easily create in a Jest environment a mocked service for a service object returning a specific value? This could be via Jest of ng-mocks, etc.
An oversimplified example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-06 at 21:20You need to use MockBuilder
to mock the service, and MockInstance
to customize it.
Also getCount
is an observable, therefore its mock should return Subject
, which we can manipulate.
QUESTION
In our Angular application, we are using services generated from API and we're facing issues with the unit tests for components or custom services that utilize them.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-06 at 22:05The problem here is that typescript aggregates all parameters and all return types. Therefore, its mock should also follow the aggregated type.
In this case, (_: 'body') => of(CONNECTION_MOCK)
is just 1 of 3.
Typescript expects _
to be 'body' | 'response' | 'events'
, and the same happens with the return type: all 3 should be respected.
All that leads to the point that it's simpler to use as never
, because it's hard to implement the desired callback.
QUESTION
When testing Angular Components, I often stumble upon the following error message:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-19 at 07:00what you are looking for is MockBuilder
.
With its help you need only a component and its module, the rest will be mocked automatically by default.
QUESTION
So, I have 1 error in my GULP when I use the following:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-04 at 13:43I found the answer here with this article!
This is EXACTLY what I needed and the results are PERFECT!
QUESTION
I have a component (MapComponent) that calls external API via HexesService. Results of Data of this API call are loaded to some buttons (View Map, Edit Map). I have another internal component (HexesComponent) and clicking on a View button makes a call to this internal component (which in turn makes another API call and displays the data inside of HexesComponent).
I've created a test with a mock of external service. My test checks that after the main component is loaded it makes call to the mocked service and loads data properly (all buttons are populated). This works perfectly fine.
The next thing I'd like to check that click on the button makes a call to a method of the HexesComponent.
The problem I have is that my internal component is always undefined. I've created a stub for my internal component, but this did not help: even the stab is empty.
Question #1: What do I do wrong? I've tried using async for the method inside the 'beforeEach', this did not help.
Needless to say that outside of 'tests', the functionality works perfectly fine.
Question #2: How to validate that clicking on the button leads to the call of 'loadMap' method of the HexComponent?
Here is the code of my test:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-10 at 18:02Rather than pushing for an option to use Stabs, I decided to give it another try and make it work with ng-mocks.
Apparently, my question is a close to Mocking Child Components - Angular 2 and the good guidance is https://www.npmjs.com/package/ng-mocks/v/11.1.4 The difference is in my case, I also need to ensure I call some methods of the child component.
To help someone else (and maybe myself in future) here is a list of issues I've encountered on my way.
Install ng-mocks using "npm install ng-mocks --save-dev" command
Add import lines (obvious, but VS Code did not autosuggest those and I struggled to realize how to get access to exact classes I needed):
QUESTION
I have recently upgraded from angular 7 to angular 8.2.14, along with the PrimeNG version upgraded to 8.0.0, and the Application working in all the browsers except the internet explorer
Below is my package.json file
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-21 at 10:18I got it solved by changing the version of @angular/cdk to "8.2.1". Since Datatable Module of PrimeNg uses this internally.
QUESTION
I want to group all related dependencies in one merge request (MR), as the examples below:
In one MR (all starting @angular/ except @angular/cli):
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-11 at 12:00Apparently it was a bug
https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/pull/9949
In the version 25.18.5 should be fixed
QUESTION
I am using ng-mocks this way -
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-10 at 08:14this issue has been fixed recently. In your case, it means that ComponentName
has been imported wrongly, or has a wrong type.
MockComponent
accepts classes. Therefore, it should be used like:
QUESTION
This is a followup question to Specific questions about unit-testing Service Fabric Applications using Mocks
I am using Xunit along with ServiceFabric.Mocks to Unit Test my application. My Service Fabric application looks like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-21 at 07:50You're on the right track!
- Step 1.
The classes ConfigurationSection
and ConfigurationProperty
are in SF namespace System.Fabric.Description
. Add a using
for the namespace
- Step 2.
Please upgrade to ServiceFabric.Mocks v4.2.8. This adds support to mock the DataPackage
property on MockCodePackageActivationContext
.
See this page for an example.
- Step 3.
Use the created context as a constructor argument. Change this code:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install ng-mocks
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page