vue-router-next | The official router for Vue.js | Router library
kandi X-RAY | vue-router-next Summary
kandi X-RAY | vue-router-next Summary
The official router for Vue.js
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of vue-router-next
vue-router-next Key Features
vue-router-next Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on vue-router-next
QUESTION
I went through this vue-router@4.05 object params which is somewhat related. There is a mention of this https://github.com/vuejs/vue-router-next/issues/494 in that thread, but I am still confused.
I am also trying to pass some data using the :to attribute of the router link component. I have made two pens to showcase the issue:
Pen 1 passes an object that is defined within the routes definition - successfully.
Pen 2 is trying to pass a dynamic object and instead of the actual object it gets a string with [Object object] as described in the github issue.
console output:
[Vue warn]: Invalid prop: type check failed for prop "repository". Expected Object, got String with >value "[object Object]". at at at at
So, if I get this straight, ultimately you cant pass a dynamic object cos it's parsed, but you can pass a static object?
I have tried with props: true and everything, I am trying the function mode solution as a more complex example
snippets:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-20 at 15:23Passing arbitrary data (not defined in route definition as params) was never supported in Vue-router and never worked as expected. Check my answer on the question you linked
Your example v1
works only because the value of repository
defined in props
function of the route overwrites the repository
value passed from router-link
through params
(which is repository: "[object Object]"
as you can see in the console)
So, if I get this straight, ultimately you cant pass a dynamic object cos it's parsed, but you can pass a static object?
No.
You can't pass any object using
$router.push
orrouter-link
(even it "sort of worked" in Vue-router 3 - again, see my linked answer)You can define
props
on the route definition as an object or as a function returning object and it's properties will by passed to your component's props without any encoding or anything. But this is very different from using$router.push
orrouter-link
as the data does not come from source route but from router itself...
QUESTION
I'm trying to use useRoute
in a vue 2.6 application but it's undefined:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-26 at 07:28There is no useRouter in vue router only in vue router next I know both pages look like they are for vue-router
and none of the next
content would suggest it's not for vue-router but the url indicates it's for vue router next.
It's nice to be prepared for the future but currently vue 2 is still installed when doing a yarn add vue so it would be nice if the documentation had a header indicating this is about a completely different project that just happens to have the same name and logos.
I suspect looking at this question I'm sht out of luck trying to get vue-route parameters in the composition-api setup function.
Update
With provide/inject I can get route props from every component:
QUESTION
With Vue Router version 4, which is currently in beta.11 in vue-router-next repo, there is a documentation page about how to define meta fields custom type interface with TypeScript.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-22 at 00:48Their documentation is wrong or at best incomplete.
A Module Augmentation uses the same syntax as an Ambient Module declaration and is only considered an augmentation when it is within a module file itself. A module is defined, as per the ECMAScript specification, as a file containing one or more top level import
or export
statements.
The snippet in a file that is not a module does exactly what you've noticed. It supplants any other types for the 'vue-router'
package instead of augmenting them. But we want to augment that package's types, not replace them.
However, a declare module
statement that is intended as a declaration, not an augmentation, must be in a file that is, conversely, not a module. That is, in a file not containing any top level import
or export
statements.
To resolve this, move the declare module 'vue-router' {...}
to a separate file (say, augmentations.d.ts
), and make that file a module by beginning it with export {}
.
QUESTION
The previous version of vue-router
uses the global application instance and mounts the plugin automatically:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-12 at 12:19
Document
- Home
- Foo
- Bar
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install vue-router-next
In-browser playground on CodeSandbox
Add it to an existing Vue Project: npm install vue-router@4
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page