temporal | microservice orchestration platform which enables developers | BPM library

triggerer is a process like scheduler, webserver, and worker. You need to start a process or container dedicated to running the triggerer to use deferrable operators.

To start a triggerer process, run airflow triggerer in your Airflow environment. You should see an output similar to the below image.

Triggerer Logs

You can pass the Temporal.PlainDateTime object directly to Intl.DateTimeFormat, or indirectly by using Temporal.Calendar.prototype.toLocaleString(). This should save you from having to split the string to remove the brackets.

(A good rule of thumb is that if you find yourself doing string manipulation with the output of toString() from any Temporal object, or using new Date() for that matter, it's probably a sign that there's a Temporal method you should be using instead.)

One caveat is that you have to make sure that the calendar of the locale matches the calendar of the date you are formatting. You can't use toLocaleString() or Intl.DateTimeFormat to do calendar conversion (unless it is from the ISO 8601 calendar). So you should use the withCalendar() method to convert the date to the calendar you want to output it in, as well as making sure the calendar in the Intl options matches it.

Here's my attempt at such a function:

The ST64B/ST64BV/ST64BV0 instructions are intended to efficiently add work items to a work queue of an I/O device that supports this interface. When the target address is mapped to an I/O device, the store is translated as a non-posted write transaction, which means that there has to be a completion message that includes a status code as described in the documentation. The ST64B instruction simply discards the status code while the other two store it in the register specified by the Xs operand.

If you look at the pseudocode, these instructions require the target address to be in uncacheable memory:

The part of the instrument audio that gives its distinctive sound, independently from the pitch played, is called the timbre. The modern approach to get a vector representation, would be to train a neural network. This kind of learned vector representation is often called to create an audio embedding.

An example implementation of this is described in Learning Disentangled Representations Of Timbre And Pitch For Musical Instrument Sounds Using Gaussian Mixture Variational Autoencoders (2019).

There is a super convenient way to build, test and aggregate the outcome of changes of some branch before merging using pull requests.

Its common to create a pull request and trigger a workflow doing the checks. Just add "pull_request:" to reuse your existing workflow, to build and test your changes.

Interrupts are definitely always taken on instruction boundaries, even if that means discarding partial progress and restarting execution after interrupt return, at least on x86 and ARM microarchs. (Some instructions are interruptible, like rep movsb has a way to update registers. AVX2 gathers are also interruptible, or at least could be; the mask-updating rules might only ever get applied for synchronous exceptions encountered on one element).

• Interrupting instruction in the middle of execution
• Interrupting an assembly instruction while it is operating

There's some evidence that Intel CPUs let one more instruction retire before taking an interrupt, at least for profiling interrupts (from the PMU); those are semi-synchronous but for some events don't have a fixed spot in the program where they must be taken, unlike page faults which have to fault on the faulting instruction.

A multi-uop instruction that's already partially retired would have to be allowed to finish executing and retire the whole instruction, to reach the next consistent architectural state where an interrupt could possibly be taken.

(Another possible reason for letting an instruction finish executing before taking an interrupt is to avoid starvation.)

Otherwise yes, the ROB and RS are discarded and execution is rolled back to the retirement state. Keeping interrupt latency low is generally desirable, and a large ROB could hold a lot of cache-miss and TLB-miss loads making the worst-case interrupt latency really bad, so a malicious process could hurt the capabilities of a real-time OS.

• When an interrupt occurs, what happens to instructions in the pipeline?
• Estimating of interrupt latency on the x86 CPUs
• (maybe) Reliability of Xcode Instrument's disassembly time profiling mentions performance event sampling.

Not possible to fix in EF Core 6.0.

From @ajcvickers, Engineering manager for Entity Framework:

Unfortunately, there isn't any workaround for this that allows both the use of the new temporal table features, and mapping the period columns to non-shadow properties.

https://github.com/dotnet/efcore/issues/26960#issuecomment-991867756

Vote below if you want to see this feature in EF Core 7.0:

https://github.com/dotnet/efcore/issues/26463

According to the Hibernate Documentation when you have a UniDirectional relation in your entity schema and you have only the side of @OneToMany , you can't use the annotation @JoinColumn.

According to the Doc

When using a unidirectional @OneToMany association, Hibernate resorts to using a link table between the two joining entities.

You must remove the @JoinColumn so that hibernate follows the default process of creating a intermediate join table and then it will be able to proceed.