annotate | small site that makes it easy to annotate an image | Animation library

Upgrade your dagger-hilt dependencies to the same version.

Your project's root gradle file

classpath "com.google.dagger:hilt-android-gradle-plugin:2.31.2-alpha"

Your app level gradle file

implementation "com.google.dagger:hilt-android:2.31.2-alpha"

kapt "com.google.dagger:hilt-android-compiler:2.31.2-alpha"

You can try using values to group by customer, and then annotate with the Sum of value:

An FTS entity table always has a column named rowid that is the equivalent of an INTEGER PRIMARY KEY index.

In brief SQLite's INTEGER does not imply a Java/Kotlin Integer/Int/int it is a column affinity/type.

If you look at the Datatypes in SQLite3 then an INTEGER can be up to 8 bytes (64 bit signed). Which in Java/Kotlin is long/Long.

Further evidence can be seen with the SQLiteDatabase insert convenience method as it returns the id (rowid) of the inserted row not as an int but as a long.

Returns long - the row ID of the newly inserted row, or -1 if an error occurred.

SQLiteAutoincrement explains about rowid and that in theory it can be from 1-9223372036854775807 (you can even have negative values).

As such, it is wrong to use int/Int/Integer for the rowid as in theory (not that likely in practice), the rowid can be larger than an int/Int/Integer.

I should use INT not LONG.

I'd suggest that you should use Long. It makes no difference to the data as SQLite will store an integer in as little space as it can. Furthermore, it makes no difference to the table(s) that room creates as the COLUMN TYPE will be INTEGER.

You can make a .union(…) [Django-doc] to construct the uion of the two querysets. This is thus:

I see that you have primary key in table person_details as foreign key to person table, you can use @PrimaryKeyJoinColumn like this:

I'm the author of the article you referenced.

As discussed in Discover concurrency in SwiftUI, views can make use of the new .task { } and .refreshable { } modifiers to fetch data asynchronously.

So you now have the following options to call you async code:

The problem is that your document class already selects a bibliography style, which you can't change afterwards. Two workarounds:

• use the style your document class sets by removing \bibliographystyle{IEEEannot} from your code

• if you actually do need the other style, save olplainarticle.cls under a new name and change l.8 \ProvidesClass{olplainarticle}[06/12/2015, v1.0] to the new name, remove line 43/44 \RequirePackage{natbib} \bibliographystyle{apalike} from the new .cls file and then change \documentclass{olplainarticle} to the new name

What you want can be built with Java stream operations:

If you move the chunk Option into the closure, your code compiles. I can't quite answer why declaring chunk outside the closure results in a lifetime error for the borrow of text inside the closure, but the chunk Option looks superfluous anyways and the following code should be equivalent: