sbb | Semantic Body Browser - a tool | Animation library

It would probably be wise not to attempt to cat all the files at once; indeed, it would probably be best to avoid cat altogether.

For example, assuming program.jq contains whichever jq program you decide on (and there is nothing wrong with using contains here), you could try:

Filip described the approach here. I just expanded it a bit.

You didn't initialize text views...

TVr = findViewById(R.id.TVr); - do it for all 3 TextViews TVr, TVg, TVb;

Also:

• You have to initialize vysledek.
• You have to cast progress (seekR, seekG, seekB) to String in onProgressChanged() method - TVr.setText(String.valueOf(seekR));
• Your layout is also very poor. You haven't mentioned the orientation android:orientation="horizontal" and the positioning for the LinearLayout as well.

My version of tasm emits a

*Warning* Assuming segment is 32 bit

You should use the .386 after the .MODEL SMALL to keep segments 16 bit, or explicitly emit 16 bit segments instead of using the simplified directives.

There are two ReadByte calls here;

When you create the index name try not use the python or pandas exist function.(list is build-in function)

Carry-out from both ADC and SBB is based on the whole operation.
If you write sbb as dst -= CF, dst -= src, if either of those produces a borrow then CF should be set.

The parens in the pseudo-code are not trying to tell you which part of the operation actually sets FLAGS. You're reading too much into it, and it's not that easy to emulate a full-adder (adc or sbb with carry in and carry out. That's why it's super helpful to have hardware supported instructions for them.)

Your emulation for sbb is buggy for the case where src+CF wraps to 0. You don't distinguish the src=-1 CF=1 case (always carry) from src=0, CF=0. (dst-=0 always produces CF=0). Try it on a real CPU with a debugger.

You can think of ADC as dst += src + CF (or -= for SBB) where the src+CF temporary is computed without truncation; e.g. a 33-bit sum for 32-bit operand-size. The dst and CF outputs of ADD / SUB / ADC / SBB can also be regarded as a 33-bit value.

Simple example:

I did some benchmarking on Intel Core i7 4850HQ Haswell 2,3 GHz, release build no debugger attached. In each loop I measure 1000 sequences of asm instructions and repeat it 10 milion times to average result.

I've made macros for repeating asm instructions 100 times.

While I can't see all the code , and can't see any recursing I assume you are making multiple calls to SearchAndWrite , you probably need to rate limit your queries.

Try putting a 5 or 10 second wait in between each request, if the problem goes away then you need to find a way to not hammer google with queries.

Consider using a queue, and worker loop.