navy | easy multi-service development | Continuous Deployment library

I expected this to be a frequently asked question with well documented answers, however, I can't find a suitable example right away...

Code:

You have to move this block of code

The line max-height: 100vh in #tribute-info is the cause of this. If you remove it, the footer will display correctly at the bottom.

In addition, the

The problem here isn't that you're using:

A layout manager doesn't have a specific size, but only a size hint and possibly a minimum and/or maximum size, all based on the items it contains, using their size hints, constraints and policies.

Setting a geometry on a widget that is going to be added to a layout is pointless, as the layout manages their sizes and positions. The solution is to use setFixedSize instead.

Since a layout also automatically adjusts the positions of widgets if there's space left (and none of them is able to expand its size), you can add a stretch at the end of the layout in order to ensure that they are always spaced in the same way even if there's more space available on the edges. For boxed layouts, it's enough to use addStretch(), but for grid layouts you have to specify the stretch for specific rows and columns instead.

To better understand how Qt deals with all these (broad and complex) aspects, I suggest you to read more about hints and policies, QSizePolicy and layout management, and do some more experiments with more simple cases, even using Designer.

The following modifications require that the widgetResizable property is set to True.

This behavior has been codified in the spec, as follows:

The UA must use its own highlight colors for ::selection only when neither color nor background-color has been specified by the author.

(This used to say "should" until last year, when it was changed to "must". There aren't any browsers implementing some version of ::selection that don't already follow this rule anyway.)

System colors are only exposed to CSS as user-defined values (which may or may not be just the system default), and not the system-defined defaults, so can't be known in advance. Therefore, as CBroe implies, this rule is in place to ensure that changing just one doesn't cause it to clash with the user-defined value for the other, causing contrast issues. The actual codification of this rule in the spec is for legacy reasons, but this rationale for browsers behaving like this in the first place is cited in discussions such as this one.

There are a number of standardized as well as non-standard system colors that exist, but the behavior of these varies wildly from browser to browser, and from platform to platform. Attempting to use any of these may have unexpected results, ranging from unexpected colors used, to being ignored by the browser altogether. Plus, as I mentioned, system colors are only exposed as user-defined values anyway. The CSSWG has discussed potential ways to improve this before; here's a recent conversation.

You are encouraged to apply a custom selection background color that complements your custom selection foreground color.

This is easier in the Query Editor. You can define a custom column as

Couple issues....first you are printing the element directly, that won't give you the output you desire (as you saw above). You need to print the text value within that element. Second issue is that locator you specified has 207 instances on that webpage, so you need to narrow it down to the one you want.

To get the text from that exact article specified you can use this XPath:

I see you have a "static" width in the footer.