Collision-Avoidance | Collision Avoidance with Reinforcement | Robotics library

by kanakkabara Python Version: Current License: No License

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(4)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | Collision-Avoidance Summary

Collision-Avoidance is a Python library typically used in Automation, Robotics applications. Collision-Avoidance has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. However Collision-Avoidance build file is not available. You can download it from GitHub.

Collision Avoidance with Reinforcement Learning

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

Collision-Avoidance has a low active ecosystem.

It has 15 star(s) with 6 fork(s). There are 1 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 1 open issues and 0 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 849 days. There are 2 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of Collision-Avoidance is current.

Quality

Collision-Avoidance has no bugs reported.

Security

Collision-Avoidance has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

Collision-Avoidance does not have a standard license declared.

Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.

Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

Reuse

Collision-Avoidance releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Collision-Avoidance has no build file. You will be need to create the build yourself to build the component from source.

Installation instructions are available. Examples and code snippets are not available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed Collision-Avoidance and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into Collision-Avoidance implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

Train the network
Sample from the buffer
Update the network
Runs the RNN
Runs the RNN layer
Flush the episode buffer
Perform a step
Fetches the collision data of the vehicle
Try to restart gzebo
Get image data
Determine if a vehicle is colliding with a vehicle
Get the position data of the robot
Check if the vehicle has finished
Pause the robot
Unpause the drone
Apply a steering to the motors
Apply a Throttle message
Resets the image
Event handler
Translate a value to a range

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

Collision-Avoidance Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for Collision-Avoidance.

Collision-Avoidance Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for Collision-Avoidance.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on Collision-Avoidance

ActiveMQ Artemis Queue does not distribute messages evenly to the STOMP-Consumers. How can we achieve an even load-balancing?

Acknowledging the message on wildcard-address does not acknowledge the same message on the qualified-address

Enums in Javascript with ES6

ActiveMQ Artemis 2.10.1 ignoring retry settings in TomEE

QUESTION

ActiveMQ Artemis Queue does not distribute messages evenly to the STOMP-Consumers. How can we achieve an even load-balancing?

Asked 2020-Sep-28 at 13:49

As demonstrated in the diagram, out of n messages published on the queue - /queue/msgs, the distribution among the consumers (STOMP-Consumer 1 and STOMP-Consumer 2) is uneven. I could observe, STOMP-Consumer 2 only received one message out of n messages.

Exact same STOMP headers are passed by both the consumers. Those are as follows -

STOMP CONNECT Headers

client-id: app

STOMP SUBSCRIBE Headers

durable-subscription-name: app-subscription
auto-delete: false
ack: client-individual
destination: /queue/msgs

Broker.xml

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Sep-28 at 13:49

Use the acceptor URL parameter stompConsumerCredits. The default value for this is 10240 bytes which means that the broker will dispatch 10KB worth of messages to each client. If the first client processes these messages quickly enough then other consumers can starve. Assuming that your STOMP consumers are using stomp acceptor then you could try something like this:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64065566

QUESTION

Acknowledging the message on wildcard-address does not acknowledge the same message on the qualified-address

Asked 2020-Sep-15 at 04:00

Spring JMSListener listens at /queue/app/*
The message is actually produced at /queue/app/XXX and so also available at the wildcard-address ( /queue/app/* ) to consume
Once the processing is successful at the listener, the message is acknowledged at the wildcard-address ( /queue/app/* ), but not the original address ( /queue/app/XXX ).

My concern is that the message will retain the storage till expiry.

How can we solve this?

Usecase

My setup is as follows -

Service A

Subscribes to /queue/A/*

Publishes to /queue/B/tenantId

Service B with TenantID = 1

Subscribes to /queue/B/1

Publishes to /queue/A/1

Service B with TenantID = 2

Subscribes to /queue/B/2

Publishes to /queue/A/2

Basically, Service A sends message to Service B via the independent-queues ( /queue/B/tenantId ) for different tenants. The idea behind separate queues for each tenant is to eliminate inter-tenant competition within the queue. Also, there will be multiple instances of Service B running for each tenant. Now once the Service B is done with the message-processing, it will publish the response-message back to Service A on the tenant-specific queue ( /queue/A/tenantId ). The idea here is to have the logical-isolation among tenant response-messages. Finally, the reason to use wildcard-address in Service A is because we can not have a dedicated consumer for each tenant in Service A and we plan to share it across tenants.

broker-00.xml ...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Sep-14 at 17:58

You're seeing the expected behavior. Remember, it's a wildcard address, not a wildcard consumer. Messages sent to any address matching the wildcard address will be routed to the queues bound to the wildcard address and those messages are acknowledged independently of the messages routed to the particular address' queues where they were originally sent.

If you don't want messages to accumulate in any of queues then simply remove the queues and just have the address. An address without any queues is a perfectly valid configuration.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63889043

QUESTION

Enums in Javascript with ES6

Asked 2020-May-08 at 21:53

I'm rebuilding an old Java project in Javascript, and realized that there's no good way to do enums in JS.

The best I can come up with is:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Jun-09 at 01:45

Is there a problem with this formulation?

I don't see any.

Is there a better way?

I'd collapse the two statements into one:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44447847

QUESTION

ActiveMQ Artemis 2.10.1 ignoring retry settings in TomEE

Asked 2019-Dec-21 at 00:52

I downloaded latest ActiveMQ Artemis 2.10.1 (Windows 10, JDK 8) and can't get the address-settings to take affect. Reading the documentation (not much) on line I edited the broker.xml by adding:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Dec-06 at 02:24

It seems likely that you're using the OpenWire JMS client. This complicates matters because, as I understand it, the OpenWire JMS client implements redelivery in the client itself and those redelivery semantics are configured on the client side not the broker side. The broker doesn't have a chance to apply any kind of redelivery policy because the OpenWire client handles everything and doesn't inform the broker of the delivery failures. This documentation may help you configure redelivery for your OpenWire client.

That said, I recommend following this tutorial. It demonstrates how to integrate TomEE and ActiveMQ Artemis without building/deploying the JCA RA. This will allow you to use the Core JMS client rather than the OpenWire JMS client.

If you want to go the RA route you can build the ActiveMQ Artemis JCA RA by running mvn verify from the examples/features/sub-modules/artemis-ra-rar/ directory. The RA will be in the target directory named artemis-rar-.rar.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59205212

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install Collision-Avoidance

The first time you open Gazebo, it will download all models from the Gazebo servers, which may take some time. Run rosrun gazebo_ros gazebo to run Gazebo and install models. The first time you open Gazebo, it will download all models from the Gazebo servers, which may take some time. Run rosrun gazebo_ros gazebo to run Gazebo and install models.
sudo ./setup_env.sh
cd catkin_ws
catkin_make
. devel/setup.bash
roscd collision_avoidance_env/scripts/
sudo pip install -e .
roscd collision_avoidance/scripts
sudo pip install -r requirements.txt

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: